question about alcohol
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: International Space Station
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
question about alcohol
Hi guys,
Quick question about alcohol and its regulations; CAR 1988 Reg256 states that no alcohol must be consumed within 8hours prior to a flight. However the CASR 1998 says that the limit is 0.02
Does this mean that between the period of 1988 and 1998 there was no legal definition to the maximum BAC for a pilot?
apologies for sounding like a n00b.
cheers
Quick question about alcohol and its regulations; CAR 1988 Reg256 states that no alcohol must be consumed within 8hours prior to a flight. However the CASR 1998 says that the limit is 0.02
Does this mean that between the period of 1988 and 1998 there was no legal definition to the maximum BAC for a pilot?
apologies for sounding like a n00b.
cheers
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually a difficult question, on its face no defition, reality is definition not prescriptive.
So why do we even care ??? somehow we need a base line from which to measure so 60"s come into play
So why do we even care ??? somehow we need a base line from which to measure so 60"s come into play
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maj Tom,
It's even better than that, part 99 of CASR 1998 which introduced the .02 limit did not actually become law until Sept 2008! And even then is was advertised in such a manner as to make the general public (in front of whom we are meant to parade CASA's safety material) think that we could have a bit of a tipple on our way to work as long as we didn't bust the figure in massive font.
.02
This is, of course, the buffer we are given just in case we have had a few too many but still stopped 8 hours before flying and are not 'suffering the effect' of our consumption.
Stupid stupid educational material.
FRQ CB
It's even better than that, part 99 of CASR 1998 which introduced the .02 limit did not actually become law until Sept 2008! And even then is was advertised in such a manner as to make the general public (in front of whom we are meant to parade CASA's safety material) think that we could have a bit of a tipple on our way to work as long as we didn't bust the figure in massive font.
.02
This is, of course, the buffer we are given just in case we have had a few too many but still stopped 8 hours before flying and are not 'suffering the effect' of our consumption.
Stupid stupid educational material.
FRQ CB
No the .02 is because the breathlyser cannot accurately measure a lower figure. They wanted to make it zero but the technology isn't capable. I imagine you would have to blood test everyone to get an accurate zero figure which obviously isn't practical in terms of screening high numbers of people.
Either way the whole thing is a waste of time. How many convictions of airline pilots are we up to with this program?
More taxpayers money well spent.
Either way the whole thing is a waste of time. How many convictions of airline pilots are we up to with this program?
More taxpayers money well spent.
NN, might be a waste of time but I have detected a subtle deterrent... I'm too old for that sort of thing but the youngees might now think twice. Gotta be sober to ensure pushing of the right buttons. 
Last edited by Capn Bloggs; 3rd Apr 2011 at 14:46.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: International Space Station
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks Charlie-Bravo. Sure cleared it up for me 
In the USA its 0.04, you guys wouldnt happen to know how long that law has been around for?
In the USA its 0.04, you guys wouldnt happen to know how long that law has been around for?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last Oshkosh I sat next to an AA captain on the crew bus from LAX Marriott. I think he would have blown .4 ! Suspect he was confused with .04. Probably should have said something, but it wasn't really my place at the time :-)
