PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   question about alcohol (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/447675-question-about-alcohol.html)

major_tom 3rd Apr 2011 07:47

question about alcohol
 
Hi guys,

Quick question about alcohol and its regulations; CAR 1988 Reg256 states that no alcohol must be consumed within 8hours prior to a flight. However the CASR 1998 says that the limit is 0.02

Does this mean that between the period of 1988 and 1998 there was no legal definition to the maximum BAC for a pilot?

apologies for sounding like a n00b.
cheers :)

The Kelpie 3rd Apr 2011 07:59

Major Tom

Correct!!

major_tom 3rd Apr 2011 08:05

... and i didnt even have to 'phone a friend' or 'ask the audience'.... just ask pprune. Thanks Kelpie

Joker 10 3rd Apr 2011 09:53

Actually a difficult question, on its face no defition, reality is definition not prescriptive.

So why do we even care ??? somehow we need a base line from which to measure so 60"s come into play

FRQ Charlie Bravo 3rd Apr 2011 11:01

Maj Tom,

It's even better than that, part 99 of CASR 1998 which introduced the .02 limit did not actually become law until Sept 2008! And even then is was advertised in such a manner as to make the general public (in front of whom we are meant to parade CASA's safety material) think that we could have a bit of a tipple on our way to work as long as we didn't bust the figure in massive font.

.02

This is, of course, the buffer we are given just in case we have had a few too many but still stopped 8 hours before flying and are not 'suffering the effect' of our consumption.

Stupid stupid educational material.

FRQ CB

Shell Management 3rd Apr 2011 11:19

A 10 year delay!
Disgraceful.

And yes, 0.2 is simply a margin for natural alcohol levels not a boozing allowance.

neville_nobody 3rd Apr 2011 13:42

No the .02 is because the breathlyser cannot accurately measure a lower figure. They wanted to make it zero but the technology isn't capable. I imagine you would have to blood test everyone to get an accurate zero figure which obviously isn't practical in terms of screening high numbers of people.

Either way the whole thing is a waste of time. How many convictions of airline pilots are we up to with this program?

More taxpayers money well spent.

Capn Bloggs 3rd Apr 2011 13:45

NN, might be a waste of time but I have detected a subtle deterrent... I'm too old for that sort of thing but the youngees might now think twice. Gotta be sober to ensure pushing of the right buttons. :E

major_tom 4th Apr 2011 03:52

thanks Charlie-Bravo. Sure cleared it up for me :ok:


In the USA its 0.04, you guys wouldnt happen to know how long that law has been around for?

VH-XXX 4th Apr 2011 05:15

Last Oshkosh I sat next to an AA captain on the crew bus from LAX Marriott. I think he would have blown .4 ! Suspect he was confused with .04. Probably should have said something, but it wasn't really my place at the time :-)

FourBalls 5th Apr 2011 10:28

geez and here was I thinking 0.2 was the minimum


(been done before before I know)


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.