Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Journos had enough of dodgy charter aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Journos had enough of dodgy charter aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Mar 2011, 11:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Journos had enough of dodgy charter aircraft

This story in The Weekend Australian, today 26 March.
Edited extract: It is titled:
Flying United.
The idea was to fly a couple of planeloads of journos to the Nullabor early yesterday morning to cover South Australia Premier Mike Rann declaring a 900,000ha wilderness protection area.
On one of the planes, unfortunately, the pilot’s door blew open 10 minutes into the flight. As The Advertiser reported: “Cameraman John Sever said on his Facebook page that he had to hold the door closed, while the pilot made an emergency landing. The aircraft got back in the air for a second attempt to get to Ceduna, but the plane’s generators failed, leaving it without lights. `Flew back by torch light with a full emergency landing, fire engines chasing us down the runway,` Sever says.” The real gold, though, is the magisterial understatement of the following line. “The media crews declined the offer of a third attempt.”

That story’s author was The Advertiser’s veteran political reporter, Greg Kelton, who was on the other plane with the ABC’s Nick Harmsen and a photographer. Kelton said his seat was shaking violently, but then the pilot announced they had to turn back to collect the journos from the other plane. But upon landing all the journos decided against any more airborne adventures.

In the meantime, while airline Air South cranked out a pre-emptive press release to reassure all that “the emergency landing involved another airline,” Rann was left to make the announcement without media attendance. Unquote:

............................................................ ...................................................

Although some would have a laugh at the journos expense, the fact remains (if the report is accurate) that both CASA and ATSB would be well advised to have a closer look at this particular operation. Aircraft doors don’t just happen to unlock in flight as a matter of routine. Two generators don’t just happen to fail while airborne at night as a matter of routine. Seats don’t just happen to shake violently. All this occurring to one charter operator on one day suggests to a cynic a history of these defects going officially un-recorded on previous flights. Of course it could all be put down to typical media beat up and if the passengers were not of the media it is doubtful if the story would have hit the streets.

It wasn’t that long ago when Beech 76 Duchess doors were well known for their propensity to pop open on take off or early climb. One pilot had both doors of his Duchess pop open on take- off from Essendon even though the maintenance release was clean – no reported previous door defects. Investigation revealed that this particular Duchess had a history of door popping during take -off. Pilots accepted this as ops normal and made casual verbal reports only. The CFI blamed it on pilot error.

A CAIR report was sent ATSB. (BASIS?) In turn, ATSB forwarded it to CASA who said that had never heard of reports of doors popping open on Duchess aircraft. An investigation revealed that contrary to CASA’s claims of no problem existing, in fact there were many instances of door opening events on VH registered Duchess. In USA, all occupants of a Duchess were killed when a door came open in flight and the pilot lost control while turning back to land. CASA acted by issuing an AD requiring inspection of Duchess door operation and that any instances must be endorsed in the maintenance release. But that was a long time ago and the present generation of young commercial pilots would never know of those events. But it's a good bet that Duchess doors still pop open occasionally and go unreported in the maintenance release.

Melbourne based charter pilots will recall the so called “Penguin Runs” which operated each evening to Phillip Island where tourists were flown from Essendon to see the penguin colonies. Various aircraft types were used or cross-hired to the main operating company and these included two venerable DH Dove’s, Chieftains, Navajo’s, Cessna 310, Partenavia and Baron. It was vital these runs were on time to catch the penguins coming from the sea to their burrows on the shore. Miss the penguins and people wanted their money refunded. Complimentary drinks were served by the operator to passengers in the Essendon Terminal building. After a quick gulp they embarked on the motley fleet of general aviation twins waiting on the tarmac. Japanese formed the main customers.

This writer recalls boarding his passengers in a Navajo at Essendon. They included a surly American tourist who sat up front in the right hand pilot seat. Doors were closed, the safety chain attached with much tugging and safety brieing concluded. The right hand engine jerked and stopped –the battery unable to take the starter load and not a good look seeing as the penguins were always on time.
The pilot was in the process of climbing from the aircraft when the manager of the operation came running toward the aircraft screaming at the pilot to stop stuffing around and get the aircraft started. The docile Japanese were embarrassed by this bogan Australian but the American was more vocal and voiced his concern about the state of the aircraft.

Upset at the bullying attitude of the manager, the pilot retorted that the manager could fly the bloody aircraft himself and prepared to walk off the job on the spot. The manager rushed back to the terminal and returned with another battery and eventually the aircraft departed with the same pilot.

En-route to Philip Island the Navajo door warning light illuminated causing the American tourist to jump up and down again. The pilot quietly cursed but assured the Yank all was well. Shortly after touch down on Philip Island ALA, the starboard propeller feathered itself and the aircraft stopped on the strip with the pilot wisely refusing to attempt to taxi any further. At that point the Yank tourist errupted and demanded another aircraft be flown in to replace the Navajo. The Japanese listened impassively ; no doubt pleased that someone had at last spoken up.

A phone call was made to the operations manager who accused the pilot of being a twit – a typical reaction that characterized the manager. A couple of hours later, a Cessna 310 arrived to pick up the tourists to take them home. Meanwhile the pilot of the Navajo managed to get the engine started and the prop was unfeathered. Various unsuspecting passengers were picked up from the half-lit Philip Island shed that served as a meeting place, and were flown back in the Navajo. Somewhere in Pprune Aussie archives are stories by those intrepid pilots who flew the Penguin Runs of yore. Not all were complimentary of the operation or of the state of the various aircraft roped in to fly.
In those days I don’t think CASA had a clue what was going on right under its nose. And now in 2011, I wonder if the local South Australia Region CASA people read The Weekend Australian?
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2011, 15:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Land Down Under
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how do we combat this aging fleet of GA aircraft and rising Maintenance cost? It's only going to get worse. Will GA soon become a thing of the past? Airports are increasing cost and becoming a lot less GA friendly as well. Does GA stand a chance? The new aircraft replacement cost is uneconomical let alone the HUGE capability gap between whats being manufactured today, by this i mean what new aircraft could replace (with similar performance) a chieftain,titan,402 or commander??
roundaboutway is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2011, 16:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
this i mean what new aircraft could replace (with similar performance) a chieftain,titan,402 or commander??
A C208.....
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2011, 22:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mustang c510, CJ4..put ya prices up
mattyj is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2011, 22:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Maybe said operator would be better off spending money on aircraft maintenance instead of buying Ferrari's
Arnold E is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2011, 23:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Penguin Runs......SIR M's Attitude

I remember the "Duck Runs" well. Multiple aircraft changes in one night. I remember one night went from the Dove through 3 other aircraft as the pax numbers shrunk before finally departing in an Apache! Even though the Doves were old they were pretty reliable even if you had convince SK he was going to get paid before he would let you have the aircraft. Still, a learning experience. Glad I survived it.
flying-spike is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2011, 23:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: a Galaxy far far away
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and not only GA

I beg to ask the quesiton, of every pilot, engineer, and polititian. AFter all the de-regulation of any industry in this great land, where has the outcome justified the decision. Not one industry having been de-regulated has provided a service or maintained itself. Electricity, water, roads, rail all a shambles, and private airports. I will get political and state that stupid politicians who sell of vital infrastructure like airports for short term prop up of budget mismanagement should be shot.

GA cant survive because operators keep trying to under quote each other and have done so for years. Now comes time to pay the ferryman with new aircraft types, and what do you know, no money in the kity. Airlines offering seats at $29 are doing the same thing whilst paying executives huge bonuses, they try and screw the people with REAL qualifications down to pathetic wages and conditions. I would love to see a list of the training completed by Alan Joyce and his ilk to 'qualify' as a General Manager, and compair it to a pilot. Interesting thought. But wait, let me go on. How is it we let these idiots be in charge. The Global financial crisis was created by greedy managers, bankers, and politicians with vested interests, yet when it all came crashing down, who did we turn to for salvation? The managers, bankers, and politicians who got us in the **** in the first place. Huh!

Anyway, thats my soap box for the day
bigbrother is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2011, 23:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arsetrailer
Posts: 287
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Going turbine won't make an operator safer or more respectable.
There are plenty of ****box turboprops out there.
Fred Gassit is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 00:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just another day in GA..
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 00:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would still fly a "****box turbine" over a large majority of the piston twins flown by GA operators today.
mustman is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 08:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
this i mean what new aircraft could replace (with similar performance) a chieftain,titan,402 or commander??
I would still fly a "****box turbine" over a large majority of the piston twins flown by GA operators today.
How about a new one?
That's why Vulcanair are bringing out the A-Viator.
When will the industry stop driving the equivalent of an XA Falcon???
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 08:47
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just because stuff is new does not make it better. For instance, tell me why you would sooner have an S-tek autopilot than a Century 3 or a 400B
Arnold E is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 09:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its pretty simple. Turbines are better than pistons, new is better than old.

And my grand dad smoked for 65 years and it didn't hurt him! (Thats the mentality behind backing old technology)
BackdoorBandit is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 09:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DSS-46 (Canberra Region)
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

When will the industry stop driving the equivalent of an XA Falcon???


The problem is, we're talking more along the likes of the XT.
Tidbinbilla is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 09:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Its pretty simple. Turbines are better than pistons, new is better than old.
Are you saying this is true in ALL cases, for instance, abinitio training?
By the way, you didn't answer my question
Arnold E is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 12:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
I don't think the problem is old aeroplanes causing incidents. It is the inescapable fact that pilots are reluctant to record defects in the maintenance release for a not unfounded fear of upsetting the owner/operator who has to pay for the maintenance. Seems to be the older the aircraft the more the owners hate to fork out dollars. It has always been thus in the general aviation industry - with a very few exceptions.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 18:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Just because stuff is new does not make it better.
Um, yes it certainly does if it is made and therefore certified under newer (safer) regulations.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2011, 02:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe said operator would be better off spending money on aircraft maintenance instead of buying Ferrari's (sic)
Bit of a cheap shot that one. What justification do you have which makes you think he skimps on his maintenance?

FRQ CB
FRQ Charlie Bravo is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2011, 02:56
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A house
Posts: 645
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Original post deleted- Seems I got my wires crossed!

Last edited by Chadzat; 28th Mar 2011 at 05:25.
Chadzat is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2011, 02:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
err uhm... Air South?
FRQ Charlie Bravo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.