Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Decommissioning ground navaids

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Mar 2013, 16:08
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm... and what do we use to navigate IFR when the GPS system gets turned off ?..
Well.... judging by how often NDBs, VORs and even ILSs fall over for natural causes and how long they take to fix, I'd say that's the least of our worries. I guess it's true, GPS can be jammed and our military friends over the Pacific could switch it off without telling anyone but at the moment anyway, that seems to be a somewhat lesser risk.

If its a policy that ASA are getting rid of VORs but maintaining NDBs (E.g. MSO, MQD etc) and if GPS gets switched off and theres no VOR or ILS, it's true I'm stuffed. Have not used an NDB in anger for years and most of the planes I've flown recently don't have one. If they are really costing hundreds of millions to maintain, they're just an expensive security blanket giving recalcitrant operators even less incentive to get rid old the s--t boxes that plague our industry.
Clearedtoreenter is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 00:13
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Enroute from Dagobah to Tatooine...!
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What happened to multiple system redundancy? What about the 'independant' navaids with 'independant' receivers in the aircraft which was engineered into our regulations even for charter aircraft let alone RPT. What on earth was that for? Could it be that if one 'system' fails (either in the aircraft or on the ground or both) you will at least have another system to get you navigating and safely back to earth through an instrument approach. You can't tell me that the whiz-bang capabilities of GPS does not magically make it immune to 'failing' - TSO146 or otherwise. If this multiple system redundancy is removed purely for financial expediency it is not a good enough reason and is a serious step backwards from a safety perspective IMHO.

I would like the accountants making the decisions to have seen my 'oscillator' problem or some of the others I could add to the list. I have flown a relatively new aircraft where on climb out the GPS spontaneously wiped the entire Jeppesen data card. It was later found that the two interconnected GPS units were hardwired incorrectly from the aircraft factory - maybe a causal factor. There are some locations where it is known that some GPS units sometimes do a 'dummy spit' when it is time for the receiver to go into approach mode and for the CDI scaling to reduce down to 0.3 RNP. I'm sure glad in these cases that I am not entirely reliant on GPS - and frankly, I fear the day we do become totally reliant on one navigation source... I hope it does not take some big holes in the ground for us to reinvent the wheel on this one.
Captain Nomad is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2013, 10:55
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone have access to a list of de-commissioned, or soon to be decommissioned, NDB's please?

Thanks.
Motorola is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 09:36
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,154
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Civil Aviation Safety Authority - Frequently asked questions

4. I’m a private IFR pilot. Can’t I just fly using VORs, NDBs and DME, as I’ve always done?

Yes, but be aware that you will have to fit a TSO-approved GNSS unit to your aircraft by 4 February 2016. You should also know there will be fewer ground-based navaids. In 2016, about 200 ground aids (VOR, NDB, DME) will be turned off. Decommissioning these will leave the remaining navaids to form the back-up navigation network (BNN), which is intended to run until 2025. Many of the navaids that will be decommissioned are already at the end of their operational lives.
I don't know if a list of the 200 navaids to be turned off by 2016 has been released as yet, but have heard that the Airservices board hasn't as yet approved the plan.
CaptainMidnight is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 10:25
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
I don't know if a list of the 200 navaids to be turned off by 2016 has been released as yet, but have heard that the Airservices board hasn't as yet approved the plan.
Hmmm... so they intend to 'turn off' a system that we own and control, and instead rely apon a system we neither own nor control. Might be some interesting liability issues there...










.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2013, 03:55
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Might be some interesting liability issues there...
Why? You can't sue someone for decommissioning your favourite navaids. Perhaps I've misunderstood you however.

As for the 2016 timeframe - remove half of all terrestrial navaids within three years? I just can't see it happening. The paperwork alone would swamp AsA managers!*

Cheers,
O8


*This is the primary objection, although you lot might make other objections along airy-fairy grounds like safety and retraining requirements.
Oktas8 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.