Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

VH-PGW PA-31P-350 15 June 2010 Crash Investigation

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

VH-PGW PA-31P-350 15 June 2010 Crash Investigation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2010, 08:23
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When such an event happens the damage to the engine is nasty thru sever detonation problems causing failure of some moving parts within hence the 'dead stop'.
You would normally get a lot more warning than that, some engines will detonate for a considerable time before they die - depends on how well built/overbuilt the engine is for it's hp rating. I doubt the Pug would die from detonation for at least a few minutes. Diesel engines detonate by default...
remoak is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2010, 13:39
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any ideas when the final report will be out? I still think if it was jet a1 in the tanks the vibrations and turning and climb etc would have been enough to mix the fuel etc
ejet3 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 00:44
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nsw
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it was not jeta1, it was not avtur! about 5 aircraft from airtex/skymaster were refuelled that morning by the same truck... with no issues!
whoooop1991 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2010, 06:57
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok looks like that theory is out the window, what else could of it been? both engine just letting go running the egt's too high?
ejet3 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2010, 11:31
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 289
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Jet fulel in a recip engine?

Many years ago, Bob Hoover had his recip engine Shrike refueled with Jet A1 at Brown Field, near the Mexican Border in Southern California: Note both engines quit after departure not far out of Brown!!! Quoted interview below:

"Mike Busch asks:

You mentioned some in-flight emergencies in the P-51. Ever had any in the Shrike?

Bob Hoover:

Mike....Yes...I participated in an event at Brown Field, and upon departing, I had been serviced with jet fuel (with recip engines) and both engines quit producing power yet completely normal readings.
I was heading north out of Brown Field, and I didn't have enough power to turn back and land, and in that area there are nothing but deep ravines, really deep....
and I pulled up at the last instant, and slammed into the side of a ravine, but I had the airplane slowed up enough so that nobody was hurt.
We hit a rock pile after about 200 feet of forward movement...but we all got out OK.
Seabreeze is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 04:54
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still think jeta1 may have caused this accident its obvious that 1 engine was shut down and the other was almost dead and he seemed to be going fine untill the last few seconds
ejet3 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 05:00
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 'Stralia!
Age: 47
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ejet3, how about you go shove your head back wherever you pulled it out of. It is clear you are either an uninformed member of the media, or just a troll looking to stir. You have only joined recently, and only posted in this thread, and a good deal later than the event and are just repeating stuff that others have already said or asked.

Really, just go f@$k off.
RatsoreA is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 01:53
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ejet3, how about you go shove your head back wherever you pulled it out of. It is clear you are either an uninformed member of the media, or just a troll looking to stir. You have only joined recently, and only posted in this thread, and a good deal later than the event and are just repeating stuff that others have already said or asked.

Really, just go f@$k off.
Hey,
Why don't u do more research I have posted in other threads i see you have posted maybe a dozen times on this accident does this make you know it all?, I’m not some 33 year old who fly’s his desk every night and read every post , what do you do for a living? I bet your some second officer and just sits on guard all day stirring the pot and doing Jepp amendments and sucking up to the captain!
I have been reading on this thread and the previous one, I am just like everybody else and want to find out what happened this is a rumor forum isn’t what is your problem?

Last edited by ejet3; 21st Aug 2010 at 02:03.
ejet3 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 03:52
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nsw
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ejet,

Don't you think if it was jeta1 there would be another 5 aircraft that crashed at bankstown? Did you read the preliminary report? Or is your head to far up your a** speculating and not looking at the real facts?
whoooop1991 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 04:38
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East of YRTI
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EJetE or whatever - You Ignoramus

You obnoxious little sh1t.
Could you please explain why the aircraft climbed to 7000 odd feet before the effect of your "tanks full of Jet A1" theory were evident?
I think you owe many people a deep apology.
Now is good
kimwestt is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 06:15
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like i said this is a rumor forum and that was what i heard from around the airport and the people i work with! i heard the tanks where topped off with jeta1 so whoooop1991 if u dont like what I have to say then don't read it!
ejet3 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 06:36
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awwwww come on guys, everybody knows that if you accidentally put JET A1 into your MS Flight Sim Mojave, you can easily get to 7000' before anything happens...
remoak is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 06:50
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awwwww come on guys, everybody knows that if you accidentally put JET A1 into your MS Flight Sim Mojave, you can easily get to 7000' before anything happens...
answer that RatsoreA
ejet3 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 08:05
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nsw
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
who do you work with ejet? airtex??
whoooop1991 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 08:39
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nuh mate been there done that, been in a airline now for a number of years
ejet3 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 08:52
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whooop191 had a good point,



reading the preliminary report, the ATSB noted that the aircraft was filled up with AVGAS.

Not JetA1 - AVGAS............


The investigators are not idiots - they are in fact very experienced. I am sure that they too were initially looking at what type of fuel was put into the a/c tanks. Hence the reason they noted that it was filled up with AVGAS


Not JetA1 - AVGAS..........


how are you people not getting this....???
eternity is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 08:54
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: away...
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread has long-since departed a discussion of any value -to anyone- and descended into the typically farcical.

It needs closed.
Jober.as.a.Sudge is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 12:24
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On the Dark Side
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Second that, time to close this thread.
el_capitano is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 15:18
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never really understood these "close the thread" calls. If you don't like it, don't read it!
remoak is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 22:38
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nsw
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I completely understand why people want this thread shut, I personally don't approve of speculating. The thing that is inappropriate is when people continue to speculate on issues that have already been addressed.
whoooop1991 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.