Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

NAS E+ and AV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jul 2010, 00:18
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Actually he/she would have to because the regulator and employer says it is in line with the current regulations, up until it isn't, and the poor bastard doesn't have a choice.
No he doesn't ... in theory.

But my point is that there may be a time when, even though a practice may be 'legal' ... your personal opinion is that it's ... unsafe. That's when a real moral dilema kicks in.
  • Do you acknowledge that your boss must know better than you ... and carry on?
  • Do you admit to yourself that the boss has stuffed up, but that's someone else's problem and I have a family to feed?
  • Do you try and change the bosses's mind ... and if that fails, say, well, I've done what I could ... and carry on?
  • Do you take the moral high ground, bite the bullet and leave ... or, at least, refuse to take the particular actions.?

Tricky situation, tricky options ...

However, no matter how tricky, the options do exist.

So, my opinion is that I don't think we (anyone in any role) can morally hide behind the ... well, it's legal and my boss told me to do it defense when the proverbial hits the fan.... especially if we believe the actions to be dangerous/unsafe/whatever.

Whether my opinion is also valid in a legal arena, I don't know.

And, reiterating, I'm not necessarily saying that Avalon is one of those situations.
peuce is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2010, 02:54
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I can see the ATC's concerned taking a conservative line, treating it all as Class D and .....well having an increased workload. All despite the fact Dick says this allows them to focus on the runway area.

I would if it was my ar$e on the line.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2010, 04:40
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, my opinion is that I don't think we (anyone in any role) can morally hide behind the ... well, it's legal and my boss told me to do it defense when the proverbial hits the fan.... especially if we believe the actions to be dangerous/unsafe/whatever.
AND it's in print stating that, lawyers and duty of care come to mind.
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2010, 05:50
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: skullzone
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If 'duty of care' is the underlying legal standard, then as I see it there can only be only 2 levels of ATC service, ie
totally controlled (where ATC actually knows about, or can see all the traffic), and
totally uncontrolled for the GAFA.
KittyKatKaper is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2010, 07:35
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds a lot like ScurvyDDog Space or Chuckspace...........dig back thru the threads I am sure they have written the rules for it before.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2010, 07:45
  #66 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Naaaahh...It's GriffoSpace
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2010, 09:25
  #67 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
As of Nov19 the world is right again....well as right as can be within the nas

AV has reverted to E over D including regular radio procedures. One must ask why this wasn't looked at 6 months ago instead of persisting with E+.

AIP SUP

Previous broadcast area requirements are no longer applicable.
Appols if I have dug this up again just got my internet back full time
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 04:02
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AV has reverted to E over D
Is that like E over C? /and isn't that a good thing also?

Just asking.
Frank Arouet is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 08:50
  #69 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
C over C would be better
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.