Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Jandakot Class D changes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2010, 03:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
CASA has always wanted to align themselves with international rulings but as always they fiddle with it to suit their ideas
....... ideals?
peuce is offline  
Old 28th May 2010, 04:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 154
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a meeting last night at RACWA outlining stuff that was not even discussed at CASA roadshow
.

This is great for people who were at the meeting. But there ought to be adequate online training, information and clear documentation (that doesn't leave many, many questions unanswered) for everyone

Departure calls are required
Only for IFR aircraft, from my reading of it. Does that include an IFR aircraft on a VFR departure . Who knows
Ted D Bear is offline  
Old 28th May 2010, 04:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8VA, what are the significant changes that were not captured on the roadshow or published in ERSA?

I will be calling SVFR if the cloud base is low enough that is what CASA said to do! or we will be breaking the rules!

And if JT tower want to cancel my SVFR that's their call..
XX-ANY is offline  
Old 28th May 2010, 11:15
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok guys if you are professional enough you will seek the information that you are not sure about from the correct sources. I suggest you ring the tower manager at Jandakot and talk to him. I could go on forever about what was at the meeting at RACWA but you should have been there. Mostly instructors attended but it was open to all. Discuss the procedures with your instructors.
As for the SVFR, the scenario was given that if you had 5 aircraft out in the training area and the weather was deteriorating on return if one aircraft requested SVFR when is was still VFR it would mean all the aircraft following close behind after it would have to also be svfr. SVFR requires higher separation standards and would cause greater delays for IFR aircraft who are arriving as the SVFR and IFR must be separated. So only ask SVFR when it actually is SVFR.
Airservices are not mandating the departure calls CASA is. Departure Reports are required for IFR aircraft and VFR aircraft that are departing into Class C airspace. No other aircraft are required to give a departure report.
Airservices Australia is the Air Traffic Control service provider and has been tasked by the regulator, CASA to implement Class D procedures at Jandakot.

So to all the grumble butts..You cant rely on the mountain to come to Mohammed so seek and you shall find!!!
AV8 consultants is offline  
Old 28th May 2010, 12:12
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Aus
Age: 43
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And if JT tower want to cancel my SVFR that's their call..
TWR can't cancel your SVFR, just as they can't initiate it. But they can deny a clearance to facilitate separation with anything IFR or any other SVFR if it's due vis.

AV8, where do I start....

Ok guys if you are professional enough you will seek the information that you are not sure about from the correct sources.
The far majority of posters on this forum seem professional to me. If they're not then they are usually shot down in flames pretty quickly. What's not professional is claiming you know something about this process that, at the end of the day, might make this transition safer. The more everyone knows about this process the better.

I suggest you ring the tower manager at Jandakot and talk to him.
So the right source to ask is the guy that has to manage and implement this process yet had nothing to do with it? Perhaps the CASA ambassador to Pprune, Sake Skies For All, would be a better target to fire the barage of questions people have about this crap.

Departure Reports are required for IFR aircraft and VFR aircraft that are departing into Class C airspace.
Unless it's operationally required, VFR direct into C from a GAAP/D aerodrome is nothing but an unnecessary waste of time. VFRs should depart into G like the airspace was designed to accommodate (sorry, slight off topic rant).

Waiting for an IFR clearance is going to take long enough, let alone if your stuck in line behind a VFR asking for the same thing.

Airservices are not mandating the departure calls CASA is.
Pretty sure Airservices aren't mandating any of this sh#t.
SayAgainSlowly is offline  
Old 28th May 2010, 13:48
  #26 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,127
Received 22 Likes on 8 Posts
I've spent a couple of days on a cheat sheet...(for my customers only )then the CASA guy came in today and told me different things to what the tower guy said yesterday...

As for SVFR. it is not the easy way around the D criteria, nor is the tower obliged to give it to you if there are other options.

It's going to be interesting...
Charlie Foxtrot India is offline  
Old 28th May 2010, 23:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Departure calls are only required for IFR departures and VFR into adjoining D CTA (of which there is none at YPJT) and Class C (which you can't do HJ). 95% of our traffic therefore will have no requirement to make a departure call.

As much as it a large change we will be doing our best to help pilots out as well, not persecute you if you make an error. If it is VMC for the first few days most VFR aircraft won't notice a huge change - other than getting taxi clearances - to their flights. What we say to you will be somewhat different but hopefully not to confusing.
Awol57 is online now  
Old 29th May 2010, 00:24
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I suggest you ring the tower manager at Jandakot and talk to him.
AND

I've spent a couple of days on a cheat sheet...(for my customers only )then the CASA guy came in today and told me different things to what the tower guy said yesterday...
You may as well call the Townsille Refueller ...

Professional Procedures should not rely on the correct interpretation of heresay on a telephone call... Unless they put in ERSA that all pilots planning to Jandakot must call the Tower Manager for a briefing first!

"Your Honour .... Curly Controller told me that I should have zigged, not zagged"

"Your Honour ... I have no recollection of that discussion"

Professional Procedures should be available clearly and unambiguously in the documents.... full stop.
peuce is offline  
Old 29th May 2010, 00:41
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Professional Procedures should be available clearly and unambiguously in the documents.... full stop.
Yes they should but lets face it, there has been ambiguity in documents pertaining to procedures that have been around for years.

As always, the CASA spin doctors will stuff it up and it will be up to the industry professionals to wade through the mess and sort it out.
YPJT is offline  
Old 29th May 2010, 01:08
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Agreed.

However, is it not time that we say .... enough is enough?
Or, are you happy to clean up CASA's mess ... again?

Is it not time that CASA provide its interpretations, on paper, before implementation?

They obviously have a good reason for bringing in the change ... so they obviously would have thought this through ... so they can obviously answer ALL our questions, on paper ... before implementation.

IF NOT ... rethink the change!
peuce is offline  
Old 29th May 2010, 01:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cairns
Age: 50
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Page 84 may answer some of your questions, .

http://www.icao.int/fsix/AuditReps/C..._Report_en.pdf
Josh Cox is offline  
Old 30th May 2010, 03:05
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 154
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Professional Procedures should be available clearly and unambiguously in the documents.... full stop.
100% agree!

Last edited by Ted D Bear; 30th May 2010 at 03:20.
Ted D Bear is offline  
Old 30th May 2010, 03:11
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 154
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Departure calls are only required for IFR departures and VFR into adjoining D CTA (of which there is none at YPJT) and Class C (which you can't do HJ).
Thanks, Awol57 - the report for the IFR departure I can glean from reading AIP and the online tutorial. But, if departing IFR (either into G or C), does the tower require a full procedural departure report as set out in AIP? Ie "ABC, departed at 23, tracking 291, climbing to 3,000, left 700, estimating Woop Woop at 47"?

Will this be required if IFR departing into G on a VFR Departure? (Not clear from any of the material I've seen ...)

You say a VFR into adjoining CTA needs to make a departure report . That's not what is says in AIP or in the online tutorial, though ...

If it is VMC for the first few days most VFR aircraft won't notice a huge change
That's good! What about the requirement in AIP to stay on tower frequency until instructed to change (which applies to ALL aircraft, including VFR)? Will the tower issue such an instruction to everyone?

And VFRs need to remember, when departing into G, to squawk 3000 until the control zone boundary, then squawk 1200 outside the zone, then reverse the procedure on the way back in from the training area ...
Ted D Bear is offline  
Old 30th May 2010, 12:17
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
As far as I know you will need to give the full departure call. We haven't been told otherwise.

I can't imagine we are going to give everyone a frequency change, however I did miss that bit so will ask the question.

It might be hugely different but maybe not its very hard to say. I guess we will find out on thursday, but its going to be new for us as well
Awol57 is online now  
Old 30th May 2010, 23:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Common sense is very admirable ... until something goes wrong!

In the event of an incident or accident, CASA/The Courts will revert to the letter of the law ... the documents.

So, if it says ... make a departure call ... I would think very carefully about relying on an alternate common sense action.

If you believe that the common sense action should be the law ... get it changed or get a CASA ruling.
peuce is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2010, 13:16
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Perth
Age: 47
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really haven't noticed too much change at Jandakot in relation to arrival and departures, I've just got to remember to switch transponder codes, other than that, just arrive and depart via the same routes.

The only time I've felt inconvenienced was a couple of weekends ago it took me about 3-5 mins to get a taxi clearance as I couldn't get a word in with what appeared to be ground and tower(circuits runway) on the same frequency and lots of people talking over each other resulting in re-transmissions and more delays.
htran is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2010, 23:59
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I know you will need to give the full departure call. We haven't been told otherwise.
Been operating out of D lately and the ole mate in the tower was still asking for VFR departure reports weeks after the implementation. When quized he said they could request it if they want to. They have stopped asking now
Super Cecil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.