Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

A classic quote from a Ppruner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Nov 2009, 06:22
  #21 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It could be worse, we could live in France, where you need a hi-viz vest if you break down on the side of the road...
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 06:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cry me a river

It's just a vest. It takes up no room in a flight bag, takes 2 seconds to put on, and as an added bonus is "Hi-Vis".

Now let's get onto a real safety issue in aviation. Something that has been carelessly & dare I say willfully used with reckless indifference against & by fellow aviators for years; The Semicolon.

This punctuation is real people; and used in the wong hands, who knows what untold damage may be done.

Are you or someone you know a victim of semicolon use?

Be safe people.
psycho joe is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 06:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a well known fact that most road accidents are caused by people taking the pickle out of their Maccas. High viz vests may prevent this, but then again more prescriptive legislation would probably do the trick.
Frank Arouet is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 06:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BackofBourke
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a sad fact that most crash victims are not wearing an high viz vest.
tio540 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 06:54
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd suggest that the vast majority of people that die or suffer injury every day (millions).....are not wearing a hi-vis vest!!!!
cficare is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 06:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
You reckon OH&S is bad in aviation, wait until you get the OH&S experts rock up to your local steam railway preservation society.

The young OH&S expert with all his life experience telling the retired steam drivers how to be safe around the iron horse etc.
CharlieLimaX-Ray is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 08:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gone pinis
Posts: 81
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
OH&S experts would have a field day if they saw LAME's doing engine adjustments while the prop was turning
mendi63 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 08:18
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,380
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
OH & S in nearly all states now have a "2 metre" legislation relating to working higher than 2 metres off the ground, and associated diktats for safety harnesses etc. Very tricky to comply when you're on the roof of a helicopter in the middle of a paddock somewhere carrying out a pre flight inspection And how did we manage on aircraft carrier flight decks in the 60's and 70's without OH & S.....

The hi vis vest on the apron is indicative of the world gone mad. Going OT, my friend's van has now been impounded by his local police since last June following a fatal accident where a pedestrian walked in front of him whilst in heavy traffic at a speed well below the posted limit. Every attempt seems to be pursued to implicate the driver for not seeing the pedestrian who intruded into the vehicle's right of way. Little issue seems to be made about the deceased failing to see a 4 tonne van being driven legally on the road
John Eacott is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 00:36
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Abeam YAYE
Posts: 335
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
GADRIVER

was that due to changes in the 70s in the education system, mediocre performance was rewarded and indeed encouraged amongst that generation. It would interesting to see as to whether someone with far better Googling skills than me could come up with info confirming that view.
I think there is a lot to be said for this. Maybe it doesn't explain everything, but what we teach - or do not teach - our young folk, manifests its self in the broader community eventually.

Regarding OH&S it would help to replace bureaucrats with men who have real world experience and a dose of common sense.

My vote goes to Fred Bibna for OH&S rep

Pithblot.


BBC documentary about Fred Dibhah
pithblot is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 00:58
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OH & S in nearly all states now have a "2 metre" legislation relating to working higher than 2 metres off the ground
We too went through that John. Company proposal was we have stands with necessary steps and handrails installed to surround the aircraft to access and preflight. They bought the argument that pushing stands around the ramp in the usual 40 knot zephyr might not be a good idea.

The 2 metre thing - a good job the rule wasn't around when ZEEBEE was a 12 year old refuelling Tigers at the local airport. And slinging 44 drums around like the were skittles, you're not permitted to lift anything heavier than a Mars Bar these days. And a 12 year old on a airport
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 01:50
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,380
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Abraham
you're not permitted to lift anything heavier than a Mars Bar these days
and then only with a JSA (Job Safety Analysis) signed by the Queen Mum. Which is getting really hard to do these days
John Eacott is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 02:09
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The problem is our society is a bunch of sissys and we can't get anything done!

Want to build something? The amount of bureaucracy you have to face is unbelievable and the money wasted is a farce! Curfews at airports are an ideal example.

Why are we introducing a carbon trading scheme? It's simply a cash grab from the bloody pollies. The way it should be handled is to simply say 'this is our target for carbon emissions'. By this date xxxx your vehicle will only be allowed to emit xxx, power generation must be xxxx percent green and industry must achieve xxxx. If you don't we will fine you xxx per week/month/year until you comply.

If they can charge us for emmisions then next they will be charging us for the air! Wait for the fart police to tax that too!
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 02:36
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had a run in with a 'Security' wallah. I was wearing a white pilot shirt. He said it has to be Hi-Vis 'green'. White is the brighest of all as it is all colours combined for maximum reflectivity. Wonder if I'll end up in court?
bilbert is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 03:05
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Folks,
Recently out of the trucking industry: A certain model of well known truck, State OH&S demanded that access platforms be provided, plus safety harness, for a driver to get in and out of the cab. From ground level to the floor of the cab is right on 2m.
Going to make it a bit difficult to go for a "safe c--p" at a truck stop.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 03:11
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Goblin is right...

Emissions should be reduced by setting standards and limits for emitters and not by the introduction of an ETS.

Of course the government(s) have the problem that they have to pay an ever growing army of civil servants and they need ever more money to do so. The civil servants in turn are always thinking of ways to complicate issues they are involved in, by introducing more and more regulations, thereby justifying their own position and sense of importance. Eventually the system will collapse under its own weight.

Timber is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 03:26
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Close
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't there a famous ex-golfer who had a brief (but unforgettable) interlude with an aircraft that wears half a vest (now that is...)?

Stikybeke is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 03:27
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Metre Rule

Leadsled,

That one's easy - just let some air out of the tyres!
Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 05:18
  #38 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Of course the government(s) have the problem that they have to pay an ever growing army of civil servants and they need ever more money to do so.
A friend who is an environmental scientist has applied for and been given a job with the federal government, only thing is it is subject to the ETS being passed by Parliament this week!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 07:41
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: out there
Age: 43
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't there a famous ex-golfer who had a brief (but unforgettable) interlude with an aircraft that wears half a vest (now that is...)?
Yeah, but I think the DAMP regulations would have been a better preventative measure the hi vis vest. Even though he wasn't in a safety sensitive role at the time, merely airside.


Little issue seems to be made about the deceased failing to see a 4 tonne van being driven legally on the road
Perhaps if the van has been painted in hi vis colours instead of that pesky white, then perhaps the decease would have seen it coming.
the air up there is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2009, 07:56
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Insurance companies
SeldomFixit is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.