Q For atc -ML tma
Thread Starter
Q For atc -ML tma
Arbey to Paula. What's the go? 1 or 2 regular voices are happy to issue it but most other guys are VERY reluctant, even if there's no one in front. Is there some sequencing issue??
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My best guess is:
Overlay the Dosel 7 runway 27 & 34 SID over the Arbey 7 Arrival.
The Arbey direct Paula cancels your requirement to be at/below 9000ft by Bunky (D20ML)
Traffic departing 27 on these SID's would normally overfly aircraft inbound on the Arbey7. The facilitated track shortening may restrict the departing aircrafts climb or your descent.
Alternatively departures 34 usually level off & pass under aircraft inbound on the Arbey arrival. The track shortening Arbey to Paula would cause the departing aircraft to be held lower for longer.
MC
Overlay the Dosel 7 runway 27 & 34 SID over the Arbey 7 Arrival.
The Arbey direct Paula cancels your requirement to be at/below 9000ft by Bunky (D20ML)
Traffic departing 27 on these SID's would normally overfly aircraft inbound on the Arbey7. The facilitated track shortening may restrict the departing aircrafts climb or your descent.
Alternatively departures 34 usually level off & pass under aircraft inbound on the Arbey arrival. The track shortening Arbey to Paula would cause the departing aircraft to be held lower for longer.
MC
Last edited by Mstr Caution; 25th Aug 2009 at 08:53.
MC got it in one. SIDs & STARs are integrated to ensure separation so cancelling STARs is actively discouraged. If there are no pending departures you might get lucky, particularly if there's some advantage to the sequence.
