Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Is Flight Instruction in your own Aircraft Legal?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Is Flight Instruction in your own Aircraft Legal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jul 2009, 04:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is Flight Instruction in your own Aircraft Legal?

A friend of mine wants to do his CIRSE rating in his own aircraft which is in PVT IFR category.

Can anybody point me to the Regs that would cover the permissibilty or otherwise of being instructed by a qualified Instructor in an aircraft owned by the person receiving instruction?
Ovation is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 04:28
  #2 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I can't find any references at the moment, but the aircraft would have to be reclassified into airwork to begin with.

That is listed in the very first part of the CAR, Part 1, 2. Interpretation

For the purposes of these regulations:
(a) an aircraft that is flying or operating for a commercial purpose referred to in paragraph 206 (1) (a) shall be taken to be employed in aerial work operations;
(b) an aircraft that is flying or operating for a commercial purpose referred to in paragraph 206 (1) (b) shall be taken to be employed in charter operations;
(c) an aircraft that is flying or operating for the commercial purpose referred to in paragraph 206 (1) (c) shall be taken to be employed in regular public transport operations; and
(d) an aircraft that is flying or operating for the purpose of, or in the course of:
(i) the personal transportation of the owner of the aircraft;
(ii) aerial spotting where no remuneration is received by the pilot or the owner of the aircraft or by any person or organisation on whose behalf the spotting is conducted;
(iii) agricultural operations on land owned and occupied by the owner of the aircraft;
(iv) aerial photography where no remuneration is received by the pilot or the owner of the aircraft or by any person or organisation on whose behalf the photography is conducted;
(v) the carriage of persons or the carriage of goods without a charge for the carriage being made other than the carriage, for the purposes of trade, of goods being the property of the pilot, the owner or the hirer of the aircraft;
(va) the carriage of persons in accordance with subregulation (7A);
(vi) the carriage of goods otherwise than for the purposes of trade;
(vii) conversion training for the purpose of endorsement of an additional type or category of aircraft in a pilot licence; or
(viii) any other activity of a kind substantially similar to any of those specified in subparagraphs (i) to (vi) (inclusive);
shall be taken to be employed in private operations.

(Paragraph 206 lists flight training as a commercial operation incidentally.)

I have read/heard about schools letting this happen, depends whether it is allowable by their insurance etc, but it is definatly possible.

Last edited by tmpffisch; 4th Jul 2009 at 04:44.
 
Old 4th Jul 2009, 06:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 449
Received 39 Likes on 14 Posts
Its perfectly fine as long as it has airwork on the MR as said already. The instructor would obviously have to be working under an AOC as well.
Fonz121 is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 06:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
It would be aerial work, and the instructor either needs to have his or her own AOC covering flying training or be working under an arrangement with someone who has - or words to that effect.
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 08:58
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies. The Instructor would be operating under the AOC of a Flight School.

Slightly different scenario - do the quoted Regs apply to:

Use of own aircraft for Renewal of CIRSE?

Use of own aircraft for a GPS-RNAV endorsement?
Ovation is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 09:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't got time to check now, but in the back of the brain box aren't BFR's supposed to be done in the a/c type the majority of flying is done in, sooooo how does a Pitts/Cirrus/Rv's or Twins etc. Owner go if they can't use their own A/c?? Doesn't this fall into the same catagory ? Aren't BFRs logged as Dual?

Frothy
frothy is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 12:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Ovation

For instructional purposes (or any other commercial purposes for that matter), the ownership of the aircraft is totally irrellevant. It must tick all the same boxes as every other aircraft on the flight line.

Those boxes are created in the CAOs /CARs and the company Ops manual.

A renewal is not flight instruction and is not a commercial purpose, and so a PVT category MR should be fine for that purpose.
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 21:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ovation
Thanks for that, save me the pain of the brain chasing it up. Just got the Weather, looks good for Bundy Airshow, pity I can't make it down. Skippy's in pieces in the hangar for an Annual. Bad planning
Hope it turns out well for those who can. Anyone know whose L39 ?


Frothy
frothy is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2009, 01:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Kim Rolf-Smith, Also owns T-28 "Puff"
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2009, 06:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Far East
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys/Gals,

A spin from the original topic but along similar lines. If flying training is 'Airwork', what about BFRs (or AFRs)......

My question is, can you do a AFR for a Pilot who has only been flying their RV4/6 etc which is in PVT category in their aircraft...or does it have to be conducted in an aircraft that is in AWK?

In which case, it would seem silly. I knew of an owner of an RV4 who flew nothing but his RV4s for the past 2 years but when he approached the local flying school made him do his AFR in a C152 (How stupid and totally contradicts the reason for having a AFR-safety)

If anyone could shed light on this (with reference to CARs/CAOs) I would appreciate it. Not interested in opinions, just facts!! Thanks
WhirlyMan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.