Casa Drug screening
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aus, or USA, or UK or EU, or possibly somehwere in Asia.
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see that once again the “if you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to fear” brigade are out and singing their song with all the self righteous pomposity that they can muster.
I for one cannot see the sense in this entire issue. Has there been some massive increase to accidents and/or incidents that are attributable to impairment by drugs and alcohol? If there has been then I would very much like to see the statistics that this so-called ‘safety’ program was based on.
It is an empire building exercise started by the holier than thou that will cost the industry millions annually and provide little or no benefit to the fare paying public, who are the prime responsibility of the CASA.
It will result in prosecutions for minor infractions and humiliation for those who test positive for drugs at “ramp check” types of swabbing but then show acceptable levels of prescription or over the counter medications. It will result in more sick days due to some of the above mentioned instances and breed ill feeling and a sense of injustice, and why, so that a new entire section of the CASA can be formed and grown AT YOUR EXPENSE.
We need this like a hole in the head. It will be another tedious, time consuming expensive and totally pointless exercise that consumes effort and time in an industry already doing its best with limited resources. If they wanted to include a breath test along with a ramp check I can see some sense in it, but this is bullsh!t and you guys are taking it right up the clacker on the basis that it proves that you are one of those who would never be so naughty as to have a few beers with the boys.
Show me the real cold hard FACTS that this entire snow job is based on and I might be convinced, but I am sick of being told to bend over and grab you ankles because this is good for us all, just like regional airport security this is a make work exercise based on motherhood statements and little else.
I dread to think of what those useless oxygen bandits will think up nest in order to ‘protect’ us all, but rest assured, there WILL be something else in 12 to 18 months and I hope that next time some one stands up against it, or most of an AOC or COA holders money will be running more and more safety and security programs, for our own good, of course.
WOW , big rant for a Wednesday morning.
HD
I for one cannot see the sense in this entire issue. Has there been some massive increase to accidents and/or incidents that are attributable to impairment by drugs and alcohol? If there has been then I would very much like to see the statistics that this so-called ‘safety’ program was based on.
It is an empire building exercise started by the holier than thou that will cost the industry millions annually and provide little or no benefit to the fare paying public, who are the prime responsibility of the CASA.
It will result in prosecutions for minor infractions and humiliation for those who test positive for drugs at “ramp check” types of swabbing but then show acceptable levels of prescription or over the counter medications. It will result in more sick days due to some of the above mentioned instances and breed ill feeling and a sense of injustice, and why, so that a new entire section of the CASA can be formed and grown AT YOUR EXPENSE.
We need this like a hole in the head. It will be another tedious, time consuming expensive and totally pointless exercise that consumes effort and time in an industry already doing its best with limited resources. If they wanted to include a breath test along with a ramp check I can see some sense in it, but this is bullsh!t and you guys are taking it right up the clacker on the basis that it proves that you are one of those who would never be so naughty as to have a few beers with the boys.
Show me the real cold hard FACTS that this entire snow job is based on and I might be convinced, but I am sick of being told to bend over and grab you ankles because this is good for us all, just like regional airport security this is a make work exercise based on motherhood statements and little else.
I dread to think of what those useless oxygen bandits will think up nest in order to ‘protect’ us all, but rest assured, there WILL be something else in 12 to 18 months and I hope that next time some one stands up against it, or most of an AOC or COA holders money will be running more and more safety and security programs, for our own good, of course.
WOW , big rant for a Wednesday morning.
HD
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: sometimes here usual out there!
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is Casa on drugs?
Did anyone get the calender thingy? not only is March missing. (maybe it doesn't exsist for Casa) but I recieved two envelopes on the same day
I haven't read it through yet, it's filed next to the desk
any other items reflecting the possibility of our regulator on the funny stuff?
I haven't read it through yet, it's filed next to the desk
any other items reflecting the possibility of our regulator on the funny stuff?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aus, or USA, or UK or EU, or possibly somehwere in Asia.
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is CASA trying to dumb down the industry by restricting alcohol consumption?
Cliff's Buffalo Theory
This is credited to an episode of Cheers in which Cliff explains to Norm the 'Buffalo Theory':
"Well you see, Norm, it's like this... A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as
the slowest buffalo and when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Now, as we know, excessive drinking of alcohol kills brain cells. But naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. And that, Norm, is why you always feel smarter after a few beers."
I know some Ag (and Airline) pilots who have operated on this principle for years, and come to think of it more than a few Military pilots, though they have been getting tamer and tamer of recent years. This may well be due to a cultural shift due to behavior modification by education, rather than the baseball bat that CASA is taking to the system.
Sauce for the Goose is sauce for the Gander, every CASA employee in ANY office (or dungeon) in their ivory towers should be eligible for routine and random D&A testing because the ALL work in safety related jobs by virtue of their employer being the safety regulator, if not , sack em and test all those that are left, their jobs must all be safety related.[
HD
Cliff's Buffalo Theory
This is credited to an episode of Cheers in which Cliff explains to Norm the 'Buffalo Theory':
"Well you see, Norm, it's like this... A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as
the slowest buffalo and when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Now, as we know, excessive drinking of alcohol kills brain cells. But naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. And that, Norm, is why you always feel smarter after a few beers."
I know some Ag (and Airline) pilots who have operated on this principle for years, and come to think of it more than a few Military pilots, though they have been getting tamer and tamer of recent years. This may well be due to a cultural shift due to behavior modification by education, rather than the baseball bat that CASA is taking to the system.
Sauce for the Goose is sauce for the Gander, every CASA employee in ANY office (or dungeon) in their ivory towers should be eligible for routine and random D&A testing because the ALL work in safety related jobs by virtue of their employer being the safety regulator, if not , sack em and test all those that are left, their jobs must all be safety related.[
HD
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just noticed in the junk mail from casa on drug testing that aviation security (including screening) are also subject to the same rules. I would appreciate it very much if casa would drug test a few of these goons.
Seasonally Adjusted
In a former life as a Mill Relining company pilot, we were subjected to the same drug and alcohol testing as the workers. (The pilots were expected to assist the reline team on site at the mine plant.)
On the trip out to the minesite the pilots were strategically placed towards the rear of the troopy, next to the back door, so they would be selected by the security staff at the gate for the drug screening.
Eventually, after consistant negative results, some of the security staff caught on and poked their heads in a little further and said , "OK, you with the dreadlocks up the front there, come with me!"
.
On the trip out to the minesite the pilots were strategically placed towards the rear of the troopy, next to the back door, so they would be selected by the security staff at the gate for the drug screening.
Eventually, after consistant negative results, some of the security staff caught on and poked their heads in a little further and said , "OK, you with the dreadlocks up the front there, come with me!"
.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kingRB
"The limit for you is less than 0.02"
I don't know why they're tiptoeing around with mountains of tiny details - people understand a big fat ZERO TOLERANCE message/poster - why all the fluff?
These points are of course discounting the fact that if you don't know you shouldn't be flying with a positive BAC, then you shouldn't be flying at all.
Oh and yes, I can confirm 101% that police get quite frequently randomly tested - urine-sampled far more frequently than breath-tested, but both occur. You can generally expect to be hit around twice a year.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now let's get a couple of things straight. I hold a class 1 medical. I do not drink alcohol at all. Listerine can put me over! How is that a fair process given that CASA will launch into a medical clearance requirement to prove you're not an alcoholic?!?
Lets look at another thing, I have at times back problems which do not affect my ability to fly. My DAME is certain of that. I am prescribed Voltaren to help with the pain when required. I have no idea what is in that, but am I going to be without work for a week because CASA will assume I'm a druggo for utilising a prescription drug?
This is such a poorly thought out and implemented scheme that I'm amazed it has gained this much traction and was actually approved. Who are these idiotic paper pushers? I'm trying to plan a meeting with my local member with regard CASA and this useless paperwork is part of it, as well as the stupid wrong plastic calendar tent thing. You want a fight CASA? You're going to get it from the whole industry.
Lets look at another thing, I have at times back problems which do not affect my ability to fly. My DAME is certain of that. I am prescribed Voltaren to help with the pain when required. I have no idea what is in that, but am I going to be without work for a week because CASA will assume I'm a druggo for utilising a prescription drug?
This is such a poorly thought out and implemented scheme that I'm amazed it has gained this much traction and was actually approved. Who are these idiotic paper pushers? I'm trying to plan a meeting with my local member with regard CASA and this useless paperwork is part of it, as well as the stupid wrong plastic calendar tent thing. You want a fight CASA? You're going to get it from the whole industry.
Have a look at the list of over-the-counter medications that will give a positive test for codeine and tell me if you will simply call in sick if you wake up with a mild sore throat or risk taking a couple of "Chemist's Own" Cold Flu tablets.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys,
Just a side subject, did anyone have a look at their nifty lil calender they sent in the mail in regards to this?
Did anyone see March missing in 2010? I have heard of a leap second, or a leap year, not too sure about a leap month? Good bye March
Ausindo
Just a side subject, did anyone have a look at their nifty lil calender they sent in the mail in regards to this?
Did anyone see March missing in 2010? I have heard of a leap second, or a leap year, not too sure about a leap month? Good bye March
Ausindo
Bottums Up
coke drinker,
This assumes for the sake of argument that Voltaren (wonderful drug by the way!) would give a positive result for a banned family of substances.
As I understand it, you'll not be presumed to be a druggo if your Voltaren tests positive. Once the positive test comes back, you'll be stood down while the boffins further test the sample, determining that it wasn't a banned substance, even though in the first instance a positive test result occurred.
This assumes for the sake of argument that Voltaren (wonderful drug by the way!) would give a positive result for a banned family of substances.
As I understand it, you'll not be presumed to be a druggo if your Voltaren tests positive. Once the positive test comes back, you'll be stood down while the boffins further test the sample, determining that it wasn't a banned substance, even though in the first instance a positive test result occurred.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oz
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Freewheel - from being stood down , a negative result and back at work , how long will the mud stick?.
(" So and so returned a positive result") We should hope that our friends,colleagues and managers understand the system and you're career isn't ruined from gaining relief from a headcold.
Ravan - entitlements will fast run out as most we have approx 10 days sick leave however how long will a course of sudafed stay in you after you've stopped taking it?! I'll be enjoying a few more days off this winter (unless I skip the cold season!) sighting DAMP as the reason.
I've been led to believe Sudafed PE containing Phenylephrine is ok. The main concern is pseudoephedrine. Out of interest , does PE work for anyone? (it doesn't for me).
(" So and so returned a positive result") We should hope that our friends,colleagues and managers understand the system and you're career isn't ruined from gaining relief from a headcold.
Ravan - entitlements will fast run out as most we have approx 10 days sick leave however how long will a course of sudafed stay in you after you've stopped taking it?! I'll be enjoying a few more days off this winter (unless I skip the cold season!) sighting DAMP as the reason.
I've been led to believe Sudafed PE containing Phenylephrine is ok. The main concern is pseudoephedrine. Out of interest , does PE work for anyone? (it doesn't for me).
Join Date: May 2002
Location: BNE
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone know what the story is with officially prescribed restricted medications? Have allowances been made?
e.g, A person suffers from the adult version of ADHD and is prescribed dexamphetamine from a specialist. The condition has been well controlled with this medication for many years. Where would this person stand?
The same situation could be said about people with mild epilepsy who take benzodiazepines to control it.
e.g, A person suffers from the adult version of ADHD and is prescribed dexamphetamine from a specialist. The condition has been well controlled with this medication for many years. Where would this person stand?
The same situation could be said about people with mild epilepsy who take benzodiazepines to control it.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aus, or USA, or UK or EU, or possibly somehwere in Asia.
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Codeine is persistant and detectable in small quantities that are above the CASA proscribed limit. Say you have tooh ache on the weekend, dose up on panadeine, get tooth fixed Monday and go to work the next day, turn up and get tested, uh-oh positive result, over the limit (when test returns after indeterminate time at lab).
Testing is to evideniary standards so now you can be convicted on this legal 'evidence' of your drug taking.
Another scenario, you are at work have tooth ache, chew a panadiene tablet, but before you can rinse your mouth CASA man shoves a swap in your mouth (you cannot refuse or leave the site of the testing), you say that you just had a tab in your mouth and would like to rinse mouth, or wait 15 minutes and have a second test (same as for alcohol test) but CASA not obliged to do that, they can hang you out to dry from this single sample which is in no way representative of the real event. Yes, it is unlikely, but it is possible and sooner or later WILL happen.
I would also like to see the cost benefit analysis that shows that the tens of millions of dollars that this will cost each year will provide any form of safety benefit. these costs will go from now till forever so get used to it. they may be shared between industry and regulator at the moment, but I for one do not expect anything but full cost recovery in the near future.
yes, I am protesting a lot, but just the same as I do not tolerate pilots who would even think of coming to work with PBA over the limit, or after taking any type of drugs that can affect their performance, I have little tolerance for stupid, worthless, pointless time and money eating nonsense like this that is an empire building exercise in an attempt to fool the general public that CASA is actually making aviation safer! it is the whole security/ASIC thing over again. Useless and pointless.
Bring back the old 'Crash Comic' that would be a damn side more effective as a safety program than this load of dog's vomit.
HD
Testing is to evideniary standards so now you can be convicted on this legal 'evidence' of your drug taking.
Another scenario, you are at work have tooth ache, chew a panadiene tablet, but before you can rinse your mouth CASA man shoves a swap in your mouth (you cannot refuse or leave the site of the testing), you say that you just had a tab in your mouth and would like to rinse mouth, or wait 15 minutes and have a second test (same as for alcohol test) but CASA not obliged to do that, they can hang you out to dry from this single sample which is in no way representative of the real event. Yes, it is unlikely, but it is possible and sooner or later WILL happen.
I would also like to see the cost benefit analysis that shows that the tens of millions of dollars that this will cost each year will provide any form of safety benefit. these costs will go from now till forever so get used to it. they may be shared between industry and regulator at the moment, but I for one do not expect anything but full cost recovery in the near future.
yes, I am protesting a lot, but just the same as I do not tolerate pilots who would even think of coming to work with PBA over the limit, or after taking any type of drugs that can affect their performance, I have little tolerance for stupid, worthless, pointless time and money eating nonsense like this that is an empire building exercise in an attempt to fool the general public that CASA is actually making aviation safer! it is the whole security/ASIC thing over again. Useless and pointless.
Bring back the old 'Crash Comic' that would be a damn side more effective as a safety program than this load of dog's vomit.
HD
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harley and others - I've been through this type of testing dozens and dozens of times, and I wouldn't worry too much about it. I'll be infinitely surprised if they actually attempt to pull anyone offline immediately after testing, for anything such as false positives for amphets/cocaine etc. The normal procedure is to give you a quick interview about ANY drugs or medication you've taken in recent history, before the testing - and this is recorded. There's generally an A and B urine sample, in urine testing, properly taken and sealed with tamper-proof seals - they'll eliminate any of the medication you've quoted before any action is taken. And yes, everything can be eliminated - the only problem with false positives are during on-the-spot testing, not with more accurate laboratory testing methods.
If you've tested positive and all the false positives have been eliminated, they'll notify you, and open and test the B sample in your presence.
There are FAR too many legal ramifications, especially in this day and age, for pulling someone offline, potentially affecting them financially and perhaps permanently damaging their employment, due to a false positive on an inaccurate on-the-spot testing method. If CASA are planning to do this, then they'll be getting some rude shocks.
To reiterate a main point - there is NO WAY you will be convicted of any offence, or anything to that extreme, from a false positive. Yes, certain medication can give a false positive - but this is ALWAYS distinguishable at the correct level of testing. Nobody will be losing their jobs after taking Codral (I've tested positive for amphets after taking that, around 2 years ago).
If you've tested positive and all the false positives have been eliminated, they'll notify you, and open and test the B sample in your presence.
There are FAR too many legal ramifications, especially in this day and age, for pulling someone offline, potentially affecting them financially and perhaps permanently damaging their employment, due to a false positive on an inaccurate on-the-spot testing method. If CASA are planning to do this, then they'll be getting some rude shocks.
To reiterate a main point - there is NO WAY you will be convicted of any offence, or anything to that extreme, from a false positive. Yes, certain medication can give a false positive - but this is ALWAYS distinguishable at the correct level of testing. Nobody will be losing their jobs after taking Codral (I've tested positive for amphets after taking that, around 2 years ago).
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: inner suburbia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll be infinitely surprised if they actually attempt to pull anyone offline immediately after testing, for anything such as false positives for amphets/cocaine etc. The normal procedure is to give you a quick interview about ANY drugs or medication you've taken in recent history, before the testing - and this is recorded.
Page 16 says
• must cease performing, or being available to perform, a SSAA if they:
• return a positive result for a drug or alcohol test
• return a positive result for a drug or alcohol test
Look at it from an employers point of view.,,, someone tests positive (it doesn't matter if it's a false positive), therefore they can't fly or perform their duties, therefore a replacement must be found.
At best this will a nuisance (ie Fred ain't doing anything tomorrow, so he can do this charter), and at worst a real financial problem. (I can't get anybody to this location at short notice, so I've lost this and the next n charters, therefore I've got to cut costs and sack Joe)
Whilst I believe that the intent is noble., the implementation is very legalistic and draconian.
What is written in 'black and white' is what CASA will use to make our lives miserable.
Don't forget that you are dealing with a bureaucracy that has absolutely nothing to lose in wasting your time, money and patience.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUS
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The whole idea is wrong!
However.
My Company, as part of their DAMP, has a person to contact.
Ops.... "we need you to fly"
Me.... "That should be okay, I just need to talk to our contact person and then I will get back to you".
Me.... "Hi contact person. The company have called me to fly, but I have a problem, you see I had a tickly throat last Thursday and took a Panadeine"
Contact person........."Not a problem b....sht....bst....bsht.
Me...."Thats fine, I understand that. Fax or email me that I am 100% clear to fly.
However.
My Company, as part of their DAMP, has a person to contact.
Ops.... "we need you to fly"
Me.... "That should be okay, I just need to talk to our contact person and then I will get back to you".
Me.... "Hi contact person. The company have called me to fly, but I have a problem, you see I had a tickly throat last Thursday and took a Panadeine"
Contact person........."Not a problem b....sht....bst....bsht.
Me...."Thats fine, I understand that. Fax or email me that I am 100% clear to fly.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Biggles/Capt Claret, ok acknowledged - well I'd say CASA have some troubles coming to them then. This is not how you effectively drug test and subsequently treat people. We know how word gets around in aviation - the act of pulling someone offline for a positive test is enough to create potential employment problems for you in the future.
Apologies, every place I worked in that was regularly drug tested actually did it properly, where there were no loose ends and no potential for loss through a false positive. Time will tell.
Apologies, every place I worked in that was regularly drug tested actually did it properly, where there were no loose ends and no potential for loss through a false positive. Time will tell.