Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

ATC Retiring Ages...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2009, 15:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
ATC Retiring Ages...

From the 'AvWeb' site....

"Study Shows Older Controllers Can Do The Job — But Do They Want To?

Older air traffic controllers can head off mid-air collisions at least as well as younger controllers, using experience to compensate for age-related declines in mental sharpness, according to a report published this month by the American Psychological Association. Controllers in the U.S. face a mandatory retirement age of 56, which the report suggests should be reconsidered"........

The article goes on to say that only about 2% continue working up to the Retirement Age.

What is the feeling of the current AUS ATCers I wonder??

Got the mortgage paid?
Had 'enough'?
Nothing sinister guys and gals - just curious is all.

Best Regards

Is 56 too 'young'?
Ex FSO GRIFFO is online now  
Old 18th Mar 2009, 19:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Older air traffic controllers can head off mid-air collisions at least as well as younger controllers, using experience to compensate for age-related declines in mental sharpness"

Like flying this is bulldust. The only people who need the lightning reflex is a fighter pilot or BMX rider.
Controllers like airline pilots are mostly experience and adhering to the rules.
Seems to me they'd be staying longer if they were treated properly.
In the fifties in Oz pilots were regarded as too old at 45 and had to retire.
Who decided THAT?
Bet it was young ground dwellers... Psychological Association people perhaps?
sixtiesrelic is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2009, 19:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I am not denying that experience is why the Captain gets the big bucks, but a number of airline pilots blogs I read mention that they will let a competant/experienced but younger co-pilot fly the 'hairy' approaches as they have better eyes/reflexes etc.

Without being that age I can't comprehend how much of a change you older blokes experience BUT it makes sense if it is a noticeable drop to do this as you are still monitoring and your experience can kick in and take over if needed.

Just thoughts with absolutely no scientific backing
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2009, 11:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 538
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Two of the older controllers where I work run rings around all the so-called young guns. It's often complex, difficult work and experience counts for a lot. You don't necessarily work quicker, but you certainly work smarter.
topdrop is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2009, 22:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Metung RSL or Collingwood Social Club on weekends!
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
........fly the 'hairy' approaches..........
............as with the Lockhart River and Mt. Hotham approaches.

Is that what those "blogs" are referring to mcgrath50?

With an attitude like that, those airline pilots shouldn't be flying anything other than plastic models on the end of a line!
Whiskery is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2009, 00:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Absolute Crap...... Age/Experience can’t be beaten in aviation! If a pilot or ATC controller holds a current medical and is current with training ECT then there probably the best person to have in the hot seat. A "Young Gun" listening/learning and observing will learn vital skills that will assists in a professional and safe career!

P.S And.............for everything the old pilot or controller misses or forgets the “young gun” is there to back them up after all were all human!
airman1 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2009, 00:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
30 years is enough

Hi Griffo,
I had thirty years working in ATC and I was glad to get out. I have many friends still "inside" and from my observation of current conditions it is a toxic environment, working in a chook shed in ML or BN, difficult to run a decent family life shift working and all the pressures from management and fellow workers to work overtime. Money isn't everything, and as you have found out - there is life and meaningful (and enjoyable) employment outside of AirServices. Thirty years is enough contribution to the community, ATCs should be allowed to depart with dignity after that and contribute to society in a more manageable and enjoyable way. My best wishes to all those working in the chook sheds.
Hornet306 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2009, 02:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BN360000
Posts: 96
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Depends on what kind of ATC you are doing I think.

Some of the guys admit to not wanting to work by the 'seat of their pants' as they get well in to their 50's even though they can still do it well. Add to that the 'environment', those who can afford financially to 'step back' usually do.

In a more sedate workplace, things may be different - but some places still require a fast 'CPU' - and everyone's CPU slows down as you get older, no matter how good you think you are in your 30's and 40's.

Luckily I can afford to leave now - and I consider it more and more every day I see another 'smartest guy in the room' come out with a 'new' idea to make the place work 'more efficiently'!

That is probably the reason more guys jump - not the job, but the 'environment'.
BN APP 125.6 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2009, 05:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's one over sixty working in a tower I'm told.
As the others say, it's the conditions and they're dictated by the new industry, MANAGEMENT. (Similar sort of concern to Airport security)
In the olden days, managers mostly came up through the ranks. Now they're products of a uni degree, coming straight out from there with all the answers and don't think they need to know much about the industry they come to ... they won't be staying long, so why waste time learning about what the plebs actually do.
Added to this they bring wonderful computer programs that other similar uni grads have come up with.
Oh YES! the writers of the books they study interviewed practical people and come up with their masterpeices. The practical people leave out things that normal practical people take for granted in the interviews, so our wonder writers don't actually have the whole story.
The method that is used to work out if someone is tired and should have a longer rest peoriod is a BEAUTY. Punch in the duty times start and finish times and Bob's ya' uncle.
Oh Dear! worker has gone over the magic number that says can can't come to work... NO problem, we'll just start him five minutes later.
Bung in new start time, and wonder of wonders, he's legal now.
This sort of cr*p is getting too common and people who once were loyal employees decide they have enough money to leave.
Treated properly and humanely they'd stay years longer.
As it astands most will leave after the managers have flitted off to the next industry to bugg*r THAT up.
sixtiesrelic is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.