12/12/'91 To 12/12/'08...How Far Have We Come??
Thread Starter
12/12/'91 To 12/12/'08...How Far Have We Come??
Its been 17 years now since the introduction of the 'Reduction of Services', commencing with the first 'trench' of the withdrawal of services to the Industry by announcing the demise of Flight Service on this day, 12/12/'91.
The day that full services to VFR aircraft disappeared.
'Affordable Safety'.....'Cost Recovery'.....'Your Safety Will Be Enhanced, and It Will Cost You Less'....All of those 'Mantras'....
Has it REALLY cost us ANY less - and has our SAFETY been enhanced??
How far have we REALLY come?
No more 'face to face' Briefing Office where all manner of comprehensive information was held.
'NAS' still not finalised....or is it? Millions of Dollars 'wasted'.
Further withdrawal of services / navaids etc.
Yet, still a 'profit' of around $100M or so returned to 'the major stakeholder' - the Govt. - And who provides this revenue?
I wonder what the next 17 years or so will bring? (WAAS, ADSB, 'Other' new technologies? Satellite VHF direct, Australia wide? )
I'm curious.....and sad - not for myself, I've 'retired' - but for the Industry as a whole.
We seem to have been sold a 'pup', promised so much, and its gone backwards......IMHO....and so much 'could' be done.
It can't be the $$'s - we return those to Govt.
So what is the 'outlook' for the next 17 years I wonder?
Cheers
The day that full services to VFR aircraft disappeared.
'Affordable Safety'.....'Cost Recovery'.....'Your Safety Will Be Enhanced, and It Will Cost You Less'....All of those 'Mantras'....
Has it REALLY cost us ANY less - and has our SAFETY been enhanced??
How far have we REALLY come?
No more 'face to face' Briefing Office where all manner of comprehensive information was held.
'NAS' still not finalised....or is it? Millions of Dollars 'wasted'.
Further withdrawal of services / navaids etc.
Yet, still a 'profit' of around $100M or so returned to 'the major stakeholder' - the Govt. - And who provides this revenue?
I wonder what the next 17 years or so will bring? (WAAS, ADSB, 'Other' new technologies? Satellite VHF direct, Australia wide? )
I'm curious.....and sad - not for myself, I've 'retired' - but for the Industry as a whole.
We seem to have been sold a 'pup', promised so much, and its gone backwards......IMHO....and so much 'could' be done.
It can't be the $$'s - we return those to Govt.
So what is the 'outlook' for the next 17 years I wonder?
Cheers
Last edited by Ex FSO GRIFFO; 12th Dec 2008 at 03:51.
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
So what is the 'outlook' for the next 17 years I wonder?
It seems to be the current 'modus operandi', nothing is ever done solely based on improving safety regardless of cost, it is all 'affordable safety' and 'risk minimisation'...
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NT
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Griffo,
I think it was ever thus. I can't recall a minister with responsibility for aviation (regardless of the name of the dept or the colour of the party) ever having an understanding of the industry. It's always been a case of oiling the squeakiest wheels, knee-jerk reactions to prophesies of doom and keeping the head below the parapet.
There is no hope, I'm afraid, because there has been no one in power, and this applies equally to both Coalition and Labor govts over the last two decades, who ever understood aviation - particularly your regional variety and GA.
If you are adept at manipulating a lazy and ill-informed press, you've got far more chance of getting your views (and agenda) across. I offer the rubbish that is being floated about 'renegade controllers' that has been swallowed whole by aviation 'journalists'. I know it's rubbish because I know a lot of these guys and they would no more conduct 'covert industrial action' than murder their mothers.
I remain flabergasted that there is not one reporter in this wide continent who is capable of asking hard and pertinent questions. On the other hand, if you don't really know your subject, you wouldn't have a clue what to ask - it's far easier quoting the spin-doctors and, hey, the paycheck still goes in the bank and the dumb public is none the wiser.
I think it was ever thus. I can't recall a minister with responsibility for aviation (regardless of the name of the dept or the colour of the party) ever having an understanding of the industry. It's always been a case of oiling the squeakiest wheels, knee-jerk reactions to prophesies of doom and keeping the head below the parapet.
There is no hope, I'm afraid, because there has been no one in power, and this applies equally to both Coalition and Labor govts over the last two decades, who ever understood aviation - particularly your regional variety and GA.
If you are adept at manipulating a lazy and ill-informed press, you've got far more chance of getting your views (and agenda) across. I offer the rubbish that is being floated about 'renegade controllers' that has been swallowed whole by aviation 'journalists'. I know it's rubbish because I know a lot of these guys and they would no more conduct 'covert industrial action' than murder their mothers.
I remain flabergasted that there is not one reporter in this wide continent who is capable of asking hard and pertinent questions. On the other hand, if you don't really know your subject, you wouldn't have a clue what to ask - it's far easier quoting the spin-doctors and, hey, the paycheck still goes in the bank and the dumb public is none the wiser.
C'mon Griffo, you could have waited another 3 years to make it a more remarkable date to remember.
I was a puppy back on the 12/12/91 but i have cried when they slammed the door in my face at the Bankstown briefing office. I never forget the empty feeling in my heart when i stood there with my flight plan in my hand waiting for some friendly face to look at it, frown, and simply throw it in the nearest bin and help me to do it right.
Do you know what?... I still have the same feeling today because nothing has changed despite all the new gadgets to help us making our life more comfortable...
No computers or simulated voice messages will ever replace you guys with your seasond knowledge and face to face conduct to help us fledging aviators to achive our dream and help keeping our skies safe.
As for our future...I guess it is all up to us because if we wait for our politicians to make it better for us... Well...we better start our campaign by sponsoring someone who has at least half an idea about aviation.
( Sorry Dick, you have had your chance )
I was a puppy back on the 12/12/91 but i have cried when they slammed the door in my face at the Bankstown briefing office. I never forget the empty feeling in my heart when i stood there with my flight plan in my hand waiting for some friendly face to look at it, frown, and simply throw it in the nearest bin and help me to do it right.
Do you know what?... I still have the same feeling today because nothing has changed despite all the new gadgets to help us making our life more comfortable...
No computers or simulated voice messages will ever replace you guys with your seasond knowledge and face to face conduct to help us fledging aviators to achive our dream and help keeping our skies safe.
As for our future...I guess it is all up to us because if we wait for our politicians to make it better for us... Well...we better start our campaign by sponsoring someone who has at least half an idea about aviation.
( Sorry Dick, you have had your chance )
Some very good points raised, however it wasn't all beer and skittles then either. While most flight service guys were friendly and helpful there were a few little Hitlers too. It wasn't unusual to have a VFR plan refused due to him/her declaring the weather non VMC even though you could see Mittagong from Sydney if only they would step outside and look. At one time I seem to recall a move to have area supervisors with the authority to ground all VFR aircraft for 100's of miles around should they deem the wx non VMC. Thank god that one never got up. But that said they were usually very helpful in the more remote locations like Ceduna, Leigh creek etc. Full reporting died with them but to be honest technology was the cause of it's demise. I mean what is the real use of a rolling SAR with transponder coverage around the most flown areas, Satellite recievers of EPIRBS, extensive VHF coverage etc. There is only so many levels of coverage you can have before someone yells enough already.
The biggest problem we have today is the constant changing of the rules and procedures. First you are encouraged to file a plan to enter CTA then not to, now it's file one or you don't get in etc. Little wonder pilots make mistakes when the powers that be can't decide what they want.
The biggest problem we have today is the constant changing of the rules and procedures. First you are encouraged to file a plan to enter CTA then not to, now it's file one or you don't get in etc. Little wonder pilots make mistakes when the powers that be can't decide what they want.
Just Binos
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mackay, Australia
Age: 71
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your last paragraph is spot on, tossas. but to say
is simply misquoting the facts. No FS briefing officer ever had the power to knock back a VFR flight plan.
It was generally similar to working air-ground on FS; look, we've just had a report of 12 octas of stratus at 150 feet and visibility zero in driving rain. Roger, thanks for that, we'll just push on and have a look. No wonder some of us decided the whole job was a waste of time.
While most flight service guys were friendly and helpful there were a few little Hitlers too. It wasn't unusual to have a VFR plan refused due to him/her declaring the weather non VMC even though you could see Mittagong from Sydney if only they would step outside and look
It was generally similar to working air-ground on FS; look, we've just had a report of 12 octas of stratus at 150 feet and visibility zero in driving rain. Roger, thanks for that, we'll just push on and have a look.
No wonder some of us decided the whole job was a waste of time.
I beg to differ. I remember quite clearly back in about 1983 I was learning to fly in Wagga and with an instructor we went on a nav to Bankstown in marginal but improving weather. After refuelling and having lunch I submitted my plan for the homeward run under the supervision of my instructor. FS refused to accept it due in their opinion ( on old forecasts.. non VMC ) We ended up flying home anyhow NO SAR NO DETAILS (remember that) in quiet good weather particularly west of the range.
It is something you never forget.
It is something you never forget.
Thread Starter
Sorry 'Tossas', but simply have GOT to support 'Binos' here!!
FS DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO AS YOU SUGGESTED. PERIOD!
Perhaps it was an 'over enthusiastic' ATCer - at the same counter at BK - who MAY have referred your plan to the SOC - that's SENIOR OPERATIONAL CONTROLLER - if they were still around then.
They had the authority.
And a few argumets have ensued about that too!!
BUT - NO FSO would even attempt to 'knock back' or refuse to accept your Plan. Why? We weren't allowed to! In other words, we did not have the authority - and many is the time in various 'outstations' have I taken a plan,
advised the pilot accordingly that 'this' was the latest weather, read '****house', and would he like a coffee(?), but as soon as he walks out the door and starts his engine, its all his!!
HE is the PIC - as it should be.....
FS DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO AS YOU SUGGESTED. PERIOD!
Perhaps it was an 'over enthusiastic' ATCer - at the same counter at BK - who MAY have referred your plan to the SOC - that's SENIOR OPERATIONAL CONTROLLER - if they were still around then.
They had the authority.
And a few argumets have ensued about that too!!
BUT - NO FSO would even attempt to 'knock back' or refuse to accept your Plan. Why? We weren't allowed to! In other words, we did not have the authority - and many is the time in various 'outstations' have I taken a plan,
advised the pilot accordingly that 'this' was the latest weather, read '****house', and would he like a coffee(?), but as soon as he walks out the door and starts his engine, its all his!!
HE is the PIC - as it should be.....
Thread Starter
Thanks for the thought 'SMS'!!
But, I saw the date today, and thought 12/12 now THAT's a prophetic date!
And, I may or may not still be around in 3 years time - so waste not the moment....
Cheers
But, I saw the date today, and thought 12/12 now THAT's a prophetic date!
And, I may or may not still be around in 3 years time - so waste not the moment....
Cheers
Hey Griffo,
It appears to me that they're bringing back Flight Service by stealth.
CAGRO Dubbo
CAGRO Wagga
CAGRO Harvey Bay
CAGRO Karatha
CAGRO Port Macquarie
CAGRO Avalon
CAGRO Broome
CAGRO Ayres Rock
CAGRO Williamtown ... ooppss, scratch that one!
Just that they're putting them in nicer places ... Meeka or Harvey Bay, let me think about that ?
It appears to me that they're bringing back Flight Service by stealth.
CAGRO Dubbo
CAGRO Wagga
CAGRO Harvey Bay
CAGRO Karatha
CAGRO Port Macquarie
CAGRO Avalon
CAGRO Broome
CAGRO Ayres Rock
CAGRO Williamtown ... ooppss, scratch that one!
Just that they're putting them in nicer places ... Meeka or Harvey Bay, let me think about that ?
Its been 17 years now since the introduction of the 'Reduction of Services', commencing with the first 'trench' of the withdrawal of services to the Industry by announcing the demise of Flight Service on this day, 12/12/'91.
DF.
Well someone refused my plan,as I said you never forget these things and I do seem to recall it happening to others at times. Maybe other "elder" posters can confirm this. I do agree FS never had the authority to stop you flying or demand you take a certain route etc only ATC's could do that in CTA ofcouse as now. With time memory fades but I seem to recall it had something to do with liability. If in marginal wx after accepting a VFR plan that pilot came to grief the Dept would somehow be partly to blame whereas if they did not accept it and the the pilot departed anyway then it was on their head entirely.
Other things I remember from those days were asking about ALA's. Some FS officers used to bluntly say "don't know not a licensed airfield" while other would quietly bring out there little black diary and pull out all sorts of info and phone numbers for you. All unofficial ofcourse. Also route forecasts, if you were going 3 or more area's on a trip eg Wagga to Adelaide you qualified for a "route forecast" yipee! Then the day before you would ring FS with your flight details and the next day, wallah! it was all ready for you. With the advent of computers it is almost laughable now. Yes I still have fond memories of those days but as I said before it wasn't all beer and skittles. Enjoy your retirement anyhow you all...regards
Other things I remember from those days were asking about ALA's. Some FS officers used to bluntly say "don't know not a licensed airfield" while other would quietly bring out there little black diary and pull out all sorts of info and phone numbers for you. All unofficial ofcourse. Also route forecasts, if you were going 3 or more area's on a trip eg Wagga to Adelaide you qualified for a "route forecast" yipee! Then the day before you would ring FS with your flight details and the next day, wallah! it was all ready for you. With the advent of computers it is almost laughable now. Yes I still have fond memories of those days but as I said before it wasn't all beer and skittles. Enjoy your retirement anyhow you all...regards
Thread Starter
"Tossas",
Yes, the liability issue was huge with the Dept generally.
Those who pulled out their 'little black book' or whatever, and gave you SOME info would have WISELY prefixed the advice with a 'disclaimer' something like its 3000ft long, etc etc "and we know nothing about it"!
But you got SOME basic info, usually culminating in the owners tel no, and even given the phone.....or generally would have been had you asked.
We were there to help.....or most of us thought so anyway.
"DF",
In the case of Perth FSC, we were the last to close as a FS unit on 15 Dec 2000.
Some staff stayed on a further 3 months or so providing HF comms on INTL services until that was eventually transferred to BN.
The reason it took 9 years from 12/12/91 to 15/12/2000?
INDUSTRY SUPPORT - Nothing better was offerred, various NAS reviews....some 'technical difficulties', and General Incompetence of those trying to close us at the time, IMHO....
I wonder if ANYTHING has REALLY changed, and what the NEXT 9 years, let alone 17, will bring...
Cheers
Yes, the liability issue was huge with the Dept generally.
Those who pulled out their 'little black book' or whatever, and gave you SOME info would have WISELY prefixed the advice with a 'disclaimer' something like its 3000ft long, etc etc "and we know nothing about it"!
But you got SOME basic info, usually culminating in the owners tel no, and even given the phone.....or generally would have been had you asked.
We were there to help.....or most of us thought so anyway.
"DF",
In the case of Perth FSC, we were the last to close as a FS unit on 15 Dec 2000.
Some staff stayed on a further 3 months or so providing HF comms on INTL services until that was eventually transferred to BN.
The reason it took 9 years from 12/12/91 to 15/12/2000?
INDUSTRY SUPPORT - Nothing better was offerred, various NAS reviews....some 'technical difficulties', and General Incompetence of those trying to close us at the time, IMHO....
I wonder if ANYTHING has REALLY changed, and what the NEXT 9 years, let alone 17, will bring...
Cheers
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Well someone refused my plan,
The most memorable was when planing a flight from LT-EN, back in the days of old. I had planned direct (in a twin) for 61 minutes (due head winds) across water with no life raft.
FS: "I can't accept this plan as the maximum time from land without a life raft is 30 mins and this will be 30.5 mins"
ME: "How about I change my TAS by 5 knots and the time interval will be 59 minutes"
FS: "I'm sorry I couldn't accept that now, you will have to plan via Flinders Island"
So I planned via Flinders Island and gave a position report 'abeam' Flinders Island, some 60 NM 'abeam Flinders Island...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about "Ok . put back the departure time by 30 min and I will go back to the hangar and pick up the life raft"....You were willing to bull**** about everything else!
20 years since I left Flight Service and I would go back to it today at the drop of a hat if the money was right (and I know it wouldn't be). Last shift was international at Perth. Nothing like spending 7.25 hrs with the HF cranked up writing down everything between the crackles and hisses on a (correct me if I'm wrong Griffo) A071?
20 years since I left Flight Service and I would go back to it today at the drop of a hat if the money was right (and I know it wouldn't be). Last shift was international at Perth. Nothing like spending 7.25 hrs with the HF cranked up writing down everything between the crackles and hisses on a (correct me if I'm wrong Griffo) A071?
Last edited by flying-spike; 13th Dec 2008 at 08:38. Reason: can't spell for shot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A little less than 20 years ago I was flying a single with 2 passengers when the engine went quiet (crankshaft gear came undone) and became a glider. Got a mayday into Sydney Flight Service and a thoroughly professional FSO quietened the frequency, got a rescue helicopter diverted and alerted the ground services in little more than the time it took to descend from 2500 feet with no power. Fortunately a happy outcome with noone hurt and only a bit of gear and flap damage. I later visited Sydney FS and meet the FSO who had helped me - a top bloke. While we might wonder where it's all gone - don't we all in so many things - I'm still grateful that Flight Service was there, a great team and one that could be relied upon when the chips were down. I can't say I experienced what others seem to be reporting - FS only ever gave me help and good advice. I hope that those of you who were part of it look back on those times with pride.
OTD/.
OTD/.
I picked up this gem from Dick Smith in another thread ... I didn't want to hijack the important discussion going on there and I thought this might be the appropriate repository:
:
"...You may have noticed the considerable support I have been given in relation to stopping Airservices from removing an independent VHF Flightwatch system without proper consultation and a proper safety study.
You will also be interested in knowing that for over 15 years I have been working on having the US style UNICOM to improve safety at non-tower airports ....."
Sounds suspiciously like trying to fix up the holes left by his removal of Flight Service. The irony ...
:
"...You may have noticed the considerable support I have been given in relation to stopping Airservices from removing an independent VHF Flightwatch system without proper consultation and a proper safety study.
You will also be interested in knowing that for over 15 years I have been working on having the US style UNICOM to improve safety at non-tower airports ....."
Sounds suspiciously like trying to fix up the holes left by his removal of Flight Service. The irony ...