A Little Busy at YMMB Lately?
Thread Starter
A Little Busy at YMMB Lately?
Maybe it's just that I'm getting old, but went to do a few circuits at YMMB this afternoon and it was "busy", about a five minute wait at the holding point for 17L for a break in the traffic.
Once airborne, the fun began, all sorts of skill levels, all speeds, all mixed in together in one big happy family presided over by the long suffering tower. There were "two's in together", a succession of people joining from all points of the compass and the odd partial radio failure (ie volume knob turned down).
I don't know how the controllers kept their cool, politely reminding one student that they were required to acknowledge their instructions.
But they are made of stronger stuff than I am, again politely telling one guy that you do NOT decide on your own to make an orbit on base at a GAAP airport without instructions from the Tower. After seeing three aircraft attempting to occupy the same space as a result, I called it a day and landed both out of self preservation and hopefully to make the circuit a little less cluttered.
I assume that as skill levels increase, things will be going more smoothly in a week or two.
Once airborne, the fun began, all sorts of skill levels, all speeds, all mixed in together in one big happy family presided over by the long suffering tower. There were "two's in together", a succession of people joining from all points of the compass and the odd partial radio failure (ie volume knob turned down).
I don't know how the controllers kept their cool, politely reminding one student that they were required to acknowledge their instructions.
But they are made of stronger stuff than I am, again politely telling one guy that you do NOT decide on your own to make an orbit on base at a GAAP airport without instructions from the Tower. After seeing three aircraft attempting to occupy the same space as a result, I called it a day and landed both out of self preservation and hopefully to make the circuit a little less cluttered.
I assume that as skill levels increase, things will be going more smoothly in a week or two.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Age: 77
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
K9
Concur. Great crew.
Sunny
Looking at the link, landing might itself be higher risk than staying airborne 
http://i459.photobucket.com/albums/q...rch/MBRI-1.jpg
Concur. Great crew.
Sunny
I called it a day and landed both out of self preservation .....
http://i459.photobucket.com/albums/q...rch/MBRI-1.jpg
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's BK like compared to MB?, same deal I would imagine, luckily I don't go into BK too often, phew! I think that the twr boys/girls do a terrific job at MB & all other GAAP AD's, afterall they are the prime area's where the risks are the highest due low experience.
CW
CW
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Age: 77
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CW
To be fair the slide was a first cut.
The next round of slides will go beyond just the RI data to "RI data compared to traffic data".
Only from that can we get a fair comparison of RI per aircraft movements - it could be that MB is 50% busier than BK and they are both busier than all the others. BK was busy last time I was there. Feel good that EN only averages around 1 per month, the high being 3 in March.
But, until you gather the data and present it to the locals - as was done - nothing happens. A big pat on the back to Glenn M of ASA for his work.
Of course these are all towered airports - where it is not measured, who knows
To be fair the slide was a first cut.
The next round of slides will go beyond just the RI data to "RI data compared to traffic data".
Only from that can we get a fair comparison of RI per aircraft movements - it could be that MB is 50% busier than BK and they are both busier than all the others. BK was busy last time I was there. Feel good that EN only averages around 1 per month, the high being 3 in March.
But, until you gather the data and present it to the locals - as was done - nothing happens. A big pat on the back to Glenn M of ASA for his work.
Of course these are all towered airports - where it is not measured, who knows
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Age: 77
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OS
I reckon you are bang on the money
Where international student training occurs your suggestion is gold. The "traffic lights" trial at Tulla seems to be working well as an example of your thinking - but i worry a little that it still passes responsibility to ATC.
It will all get better under privatisation
I reckon you are bang on the money
Where international student training occurs your suggestion is gold. The "traffic lights" trial at Tulla seems to be working well as an example of your thinking - but i worry a little that it still passes responsibility to ATC.
It will all get better under privatisation
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was considering doing my training elsewhere as YMMB is getting too hectic for my liking. Had some very hairy moments on final a few weeks ago.
I was curious if anyone can recommend a good school at Essendon as I work about 5 minutes from there.
I was curious if anyone can recommend a good school at Essendon as I work about 5 minutes from there.
Tis crazy! Was also out there Tuesday, departing for a nav about 1pm and saw 2 go arounds in the space of a few mins while holding short for 17L, as well as aircraft being cleared to land passing over the piano keys. Can get quite hairy...boys and girls in the tower do a fantastic job!
Guest
Posts: n/a
A bit more precision please!
I would appeal to all instructors to make a conscious effort to have heights and circuit patterns flown precisely, and also to hammer it into their pre-solo students that it is vital for their survival (as has recently been all too graphically illustrated by the horrible death of the young student pilot) to stick to the rules and recommended patterns when they are let loose.
It happens far too often unfortunately that circuit legs are extended, shortened, or just flown very sloppily, which creates potential for disaster in a full circuit. If you need to alter the standard pattern, show some airmanship by announcing your attentions. Actually I think this should be part of the required procedure in the circuit at YMMB, and other GAAPs for that matter..
Are there any good diagrams around about the "proper" circuit pattern? Anyone care to scan/publish them here?
I personally think that the Melbourne Visual Pilot Guide should be extended to include full circuit pattern diagrams (only approach paths at the moment) with their corresponding orientation points on the ground, in order to provide a baseline for all schools and visitors. In any case, the VPG should be as much standard fare in every student's flight bag as the VTC.. it's free and I don't see it often enough in the hands of student pilots around YMMB
Couldn't agree more with the other posters commending the tower staff, they're super patient and always friendly.
It happens far too often unfortunately that circuit legs are extended, shortened, or just flown very sloppily, which creates potential for disaster in a full circuit. If you need to alter the standard pattern, show some airmanship by announcing your attentions. Actually I think this should be part of the required procedure in the circuit at YMMB, and other GAAPs for that matter..
Are there any good diagrams around about the "proper" circuit pattern? Anyone care to scan/publish them here?
I personally think that the Melbourne Visual Pilot Guide should be extended to include full circuit pattern diagrams (only approach paths at the moment) with their corresponding orientation points on the ground, in order to provide a baseline for all schools and visitors. In any case, the VPG should be as much standard fare in every student's flight bag as the VTC.. it's free and I don't see it often enough in the hands of student pilots around YMMB
Couldn't agree more with the other posters commending the tower staff, they're super patient and always friendly.
Sounds like things are getting back to what it was like in the '80s.
Bring back the third runway 17/35 to add to the mayhem, that'l make it even more fun for ATC.
How many aircraft were actually in the circuit on this day, not unusual to see 10 regularly at once at Jandakot, especially when its good for solo, also a few barons and senecas in there.
It is actually a procedure to report if conducting a non-standard circuit such as flapless, glide or low level or other.
There is no cicuit outlined which will work for all aircraft, whilst most trainers can follow a similar flight path they all have different speeds and climb rates so some variation will occur, throw in a twin doing initial assymetric training and there can be large variations.
Flying accurately is a start but also flying predictably will assist those following and preceding you.
Go-rounds are normal in high traffic, especially with students in the mix, it should be a routine procedure for them to follow and complete sucessfully.
Bring back the third runway 17/35 to add to the mayhem, that'l make it even more fun for ATC.
How many aircraft were actually in the circuit on this day, not unusual to see 10 regularly at once at Jandakot, especially when its good for solo, also a few barons and senecas in there.
It is actually a procedure to report if conducting a non-standard circuit such as flapless, glide or low level or other.
AIP Ref;
ENR 33.3 Non-standard circuit operations, eg, glide and flapless circuits,
must be advised to ATC, normally with the DOWNWIND report.
This advice will also alert other circuit traffic. ATC must also be
advised of simulated engine failures and asymmetric training in
multi-engined aircraft at the earliest opportunity.must be advised to ATC, normally with the DOWNWIND report.
This advice will also alert other circuit traffic. ATC must also be
advised of simulated engine failures and asymmetric training in
There is no cicuit outlined which will work for all aircraft, whilst most trainers can follow a similar flight path they all have different speeds and climb rates so some variation will occur, throw in a twin doing initial assymetric training and there can be large variations.
Flying accurately is a start but also flying predictably will assist those following and preceding you.
Go-rounds are normal in high traffic, especially with students in the mix, it should be a routine procedure for them to follow and complete sucessfully.
Last edited by 43Inches; 1st Oct 2008 at 00:08.
I've heard a couple interesting ways to keep others in the circuit in check (never used any myself)
Pilot: "Confirm the XX ahead is remaining in the circuit"
or (my favourite)
Pilot: "Request clearance to leave and reenter the GAAP"
ATC: "Uh, why would you need that?"
Pilot: "So I can follow the aircraft ahead"
In all seriousness though, I always tried to drum into students the importance of downwind spacing, and NEVER extending downwind unless absolutely necessary, and if it seems you would have to extend a large amount, to go around on base instead.
Pilot: "Confirm the XX ahead is remaining in the circuit"
or (my favourite)
Pilot: "Request clearance to leave and reenter the GAAP"
ATC: "Uh, why would you need that?"
Pilot: "So I can follow the aircraft ahead"
In all seriousness though, I always tried to drum into students the importance of downwind spacing, and NEVER extending downwind unless absolutely necessary, and if it seems you would have to extend a large amount, to go around on base instead.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Firstly, I'll echo the sentiments that the tower at MB is great!
Why is MB so confusing? Personally I find bankstown far worse with different arrival and departure altitudes to remember.. but then I'm based at MB, go figure
In either case, prior (or even proper) planning applies.... Get the ATIS - it tells you what runway. You can even take a decent guess from the wind direction; as noted, most of the time it's 17/35. That allows you to figure out where you're going, and what you can't taxi on - shouldn't need traffic lights to tell you where not to go!
I agree that circuits are all over the place.. personal beef is that old saw the cross country circuit.. everyone follows a bit wider until you ought to be reporting to the coldstream ctaf on the way round. I'm inclined to think part of the problem is people being incapable / otherwise untrained in flying anything other than a 'by the numbers' circuit - when it's busy you often need to speed up/slow down to fit in - there's no imperative to fly xxx knots downwind / base.
On the positive side, it *is* good training, and you will stay sharp
Why is MB so confusing? Personally I find bankstown far worse with different arrival and departure altitudes to remember.. but then I'm based at MB, go figure
In either case, prior (or even proper) planning applies.... Get the ATIS - it tells you what runway. You can even take a decent guess from the wind direction; as noted, most of the time it's 17/35. That allows you to figure out where you're going, and what you can't taxi on - shouldn't need traffic lights to tell you where not to go!
I agree that circuits are all over the place.. personal beef is that old saw the cross country circuit.. everyone follows a bit wider until you ought to be reporting to the coldstream ctaf on the way round. I'm inclined to think part of the problem is people being incapable / otherwise untrained in flying anything other than a 'by the numbers' circuit - when it's busy you often need to speed up/slow down to fit in - there's no imperative to fly xxx knots downwind / base.
On the positive side, it *is* good training, and you will stay sharp
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just echoing sentiments by PlankBlender. I was watching students this morning doing circuits on 35R and no one seemed to be paying attention to the northerlies carrying them way past the point where they usually turn base. The result is a base leg way south of the normal circuit pattern with the inevitable slow crawl in battling headwinds on a very long final.
Something must be done quickly to bring back our standards which we hold so proudly as a leading international flight training country.
Something must be done quickly to bring back our standards which we hold so proudly as a leading international flight training country.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I reckon the best place to start circuit training is in a quiter CTAF. There is less going on to overwhelm the student, and they learn to judge acceptable traffic spacing for themselves.
Though I only say that because that's how I was taught. There was still a learning curve when transitioning to a GAAP, but I think starting somewhere quieter eliminates some of the basic mistakes that studnets might otherwise make (runway incursions, RT procedures) which otherwise throw a spanner in the (very busy) works...
Though I only say that because that's how I was taught. There was still a learning curve when transitioning to a GAAP, but I think starting somewhere quieter eliminates some of the basic mistakes that studnets might otherwise make (runway incursions, RT procedures) which otherwise throw a spanner in the (very busy) works...
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It all boils down to the instructors basicly. You can teach monkies to fly that's the easy bit but to get them to do it correctly/accurately time & time again is where the challenge lies. I wouldn't blame the green students too much, seems a lot simply don't know or realise that flying is a serious business where professionalism doesn't begin when yr at the pointy end of a bus!!
Some of us older drivers will recall instructors being very unhappy if we didn't turn at the exact same spot time & timer again in the circuit.
Just look at the youth of today with 'P' plates on the rd, total disregard for the rd rules mostly & they ought to be the most knowledgeable with it all
Went into MB this morning, not a soul in sight, the only way a GAAP AD ought to be
CW
Some of us older drivers will recall instructors being very unhappy if we didn't turn at the exact same spot time & timer again in the circuit.
Just look at the youth of today with 'P' plates on the rd, total disregard for the rd rules mostly & they ought to be the most knowledgeable with it all
Went into MB this morning, not a soul in sight, the only way a GAAP AD ought to be
CW
Just for the record Wally, the only tossers I've seen going down the F3 are all driving BMW/Audi/Merc, and have been off their P's for quite some time. By contrast, the "Yoof" all stick to the speed limit and keep left unless overtaking.
Teaching students about wind allowance can be a bit hit and miss. As much as you try to drill it into them, some will pick up on it faster than others, and at this point they're going to find thinking of things other than "throttle back, speed, flaps, don't crash" a little tricky. Having said that, many people (dual flights included) seem to find that if the circuit is bigger, they have more time to think, and this is where it's important to try and knock it into them that, except where necessary because of traffic, the circuit is NOT to be enlarged.
Teaching students about wind allowance can be a bit hit and miss. As much as you try to drill it into them, some will pick up on it faster than others, and at this point they're going to find thinking of things other than "throttle back, speed, flaps, don't crash" a little tricky. Having said that, many people (dual flights included) seem to find that if the circuit is bigger, they have more time to think, and this is where it's important to try and knock it into them that, except where necessary because of traffic, the circuit is NOT to be enlarged.