Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Human Factors Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jul 2008, 11:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Human Factors Question

A regular smoker at sea-level can be assumed to be at an effective altitude of:
A) 2000ft
B) 5000ft
C) 8000ft
D) 1000ft
Answer is C

At what altitude is a smoker at MSL assumed to be?
A) 4000ft
B) 5000ft
C) 8000ft
Answer is B

Similar questions but different answers. Both are from books I have. So, which one is correct...
ryda is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 11:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Both! Neither! They are both someones bit of a guess!

If the former were true, a well known smoking Prooner flying the FTDK at A0900 earlier this year was effectively at FL170, and therefore severely would have been hypoxic and likely to be comatose!

Could explain why he forgot to cancel his Sarwatch!

Dr

(Mad Dr dives for cover!)
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 12:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Check your 6
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hypoxia-Smoking

Hey Ryda,

Firstly Im no medical expert. I can provide you with a reference from my AFT ATPL Human Factor notes.

Under the sub-title of "Increses susceptibility to hypoxia" (Page 7.3 (b) of the AFT notes)

"Smoking- the regular heavy smoker is likely to have up to 10% of the bloods haemoglobin occupied by carbon monoxide and not available for oxygen carriage. Even at 5% saturation he/she is effectively up to 8000ft altitude before leaving the ground. However this difference reduces as height is increased becasues the drop of pressure with increasing height is not linear. By the time the smoker is at 5% saturation is at 5000ft, his effective altitude is about 10000 feet."

Hope this helps.

Lockers
Lockers is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 12:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,483
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Dr K, the Prooner in question would have only been at an altitude of about 13,000 feet... which is fine for short stays of up to 30 minutes without oxygen.

Caution is advised if contemplating smoking while taking supplemental oxygen. Tests have shown mice become extremely flammable after breathing 100% O2.

To the OP, the answer as far as the exam goes is 8000 feet.
Lasiorhinus is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2008, 02:26
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, thanks guys.
ryda is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2008, 04:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apartment
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E!....hehehe
Cessna Capt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.