Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Authorities search for crashed plane near Mt Isa

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Authorities search for crashed plane near Mt Isa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2008, 13:03
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Are you really saying that Australian business people have to have a handout before they will do anything?
No, but it helps if you want to stimulate investment in new plant and machinery.

There has been a similar scheme for investment in R&D in the past.

Dr

PS: New machinery and some investment in fuel management R&D may have prevented this event (takes care of thread drift!)
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2008, 07:17
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,353
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
So without all the Whyalla thread drift, anyone actually know what happened?
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2008, 08:16
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: France
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those Days

We even used to teach people to fly at their own property, do all the theory requirements and leave their newly acquired aircraft at the property, upon our departure. It often took a month or two, but well worth the effort.

Tmb
Tmbstory is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2008, 10:25
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THE BLUEBIRD CAFE
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
PP as an operator, certainly does not gain any respect from me. As an above poster said, if he's going to continually pay pilots less than award (about half), then he deserves no sympathy. He deserves what he gets.

morno
Yea, verily and forsooth. But how long will he hoodwinketh before he's found out?
Fantome is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2008, 10:50
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anyone actually know what happened
The ATSB will let you know in due course. In the interim allow me a little thread drift to answer Radio Saigon
an airframe in desperate need of adequate maintenance, particularly the engines
Absolutely no evidence to support that belief. The ATSB report states the contrary.
a poor decision to press on single-engine when viable alternates were nearby and available
Airfields of Port Pirie and Kadina have no instrument approaches and weather was reported below the LSALT. Monday morning quarter backing.
the supposition that the live engine may have continued producing power were a lower power setting selected.
Please note the third point is highlighted as supposition.
What happened we will never know as you state. The root cause of the right engine failure can never be known.
Not entering an argument RS but merely offering my view and interested if you have facts to support otherwise. Its an accident very close to me.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 02:00
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tio 540

The TIO540 is capable of running at max power for 50 hours with temperatures at red line. That was a requirement for it's certification.
But if you lean the mixture too much ??? at high power settings the temps will exceed redline, and something may melt.
The whyalla aeroplane had a melted poiston.
bushy is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 02:11
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This talk of fuel flow meters is a false sense of security. They don't tell you when you lose fuel over the side, eg, cracked tank, missing filler, overflow, pressurisation problems etc. I probably wouldn't be alive today if I did have a fuel flow meter because I would have trusted it on an occasion when I lost fuel overboard due to a mechanical issue - I would have wanted to keep going based on what the FFM was telling me...
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 04:48
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The whyalla aeroplane had a melted poiston
If you recall there was much debate about the cause. John Deakin pointed the finger at the company leaning practices in the climb. It was noted in the ATSB report that the engine indicated that it had been running at a rich setting when it failed. Without FDR its anybodies guess.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 08:06
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
More than willing to wait for the investigation, just hope there is an investigation and not just shuffling of papers through a fax.

From what i understand didn't the pilot walk away? Or am i mistaken?
DUXNUTZ is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 11:07
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes

VH-XXX you have it right. If I remember right The 402C had fuel totalisers which gave a didital reading of fuel burn, or fuel remaining.
But all these whizzbang computer thingys are not much use if they do not have the right information to start with.
Garbage in =garbage out. You have to look in the tanks.

Recently there have been some embarresing moments for the pilots of aircraft that had nice digital stuff that gave garbage out.

Last edited by bushy; 25th Jul 2008 at 01:23.
bushy is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 14:06
  #51 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,302
Received 171 Likes on 88 Posts
If I remember right The 402C had fuel totalisers which gave a didital reading of fuel burn, or fuel remaining
Not in any 402C I flew. Perhaps an optional extra!
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 14:35
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morno,

Whilst i agree that many organisation pay a disgustingly low wage, the operator you speak of, last time I checked, is a QLD registered company and not a signatory to the AFAP Award.

So the long and short of it is that he is not required to, if pilots are stupid enough to work for less than what you or I consider a decent wage, well that is their problem, and yes they are the idiots that keep erroding the possibility of our industry being respectable.

What really puts a smile on my face is how some of these operators that have been taking the piss out of their employees by offering terrible conditions etc etc, are now the ones bitching and moaning about staff shortages, pay peanuts, get monkeys.
Lefthanded_Rock_Thrower is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 23:12
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: turn L @ Taupo, just past the Niagra Falls...
Posts: 596
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
Perhaps an optional extra!
There was one on an a C that I used to fly, but I'm pretty sure it was an after-market addition. Useful tool I thought.
RadioSaigon is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 23:41
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 39
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aux-mains

Ran the aux dry one engine started to go called pan pan theN the other engine went. Didnt switch to mains, due panic, put it in 13nm out of YBMA. No pax on board thank god. Regards the operator you may bag him but thats cause you have 750 hours and are driving a 206 in Broome with twin progression very far away.
stick&rudder15 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2008, 00:34
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,482
Received 324 Likes on 121 Posts
S&R, can assure you that I have a lot more than 750hrs, am a long way from Broome, and have plenty of twin time,

LHRT, I agree with what you're saying, but it still doesn't sit right with me, regardless of whether he's required to or not. And you're right, those who take him up, deserve everything they get for accepting such stupidly poor conditions, given the availability for jobs these days.

morno
morno is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2008, 00:40
  #56 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Old Confucian proverb.

Thlink tlaining not chleap?
Tly having flucking accident
tinpis is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2008, 01:17
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,087
Received 161 Likes on 70 Posts
A newly licenced CPL holder is usually a little bit out of his depth on his first job, even in a C206. The workload is often too high for them, and they need support.
Mate that is the biggest load of tripe I've ever heard. Are you one of those guys who talk up the PA-31 like it's the SR-71?

The biggest problem I saw in GA is a lack of discipline not experience. No matter what level of experience if you are disciplined and do things the way you are supposed to you shouldn't get yourself into to much trouble. Blasting off with doors open has nothing to do with experience but discipline. Same with fuel management. I know people who have screwed up fuel management because they got complacent and didn't do things the way they were supposed to. Things like not changing to mains at ToD or not doing fuel logs are usually the biggest culprits. GA aircraft are not difficult to fly on the whole, some of them have a few quirks but if you are disciplined about it you won't get yourself into to much difficulty.

Last edited by neville_nobody; 26th Jul 2008 at 13:59.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2008, 11:12
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ran the aux dry one engine started to go called pan pan theN the other engine went. Didnt switch to mains, due panic, put it in 13nm out of YBMA
If this is what really did happen, then I have serious questions about the pilots ability or his training and I don't mean the training on the PA31. What should the first thing on the list when trouble shooting an engine failure..... FUEL!!!!!!!!

I also agree with Nevile Nobody

No matter what level of experience if you are disciplined and do things the way you are supposed to you shouldn't get yourself into to much trouble. Blasting off with doors open has nothing to do with experience but discipline. Same with fuel management. I know people who have screwed up fuel management because they got complacent and didn't do things the way they were supposed to. Things like not changing to mains at ToD or not doing fuel logs are usually the biggest culprits. GA aircraft are not difficult to fly on the whole, some of them have a few quirks but if you are disciplined about it you won't get yourself into to much difficulty.
27/09 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2008, 05:01
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Could be faulty fuel selector or something. Wait before you burn the poor pilot.
DUXNUTZ is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2008, 08:47
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could be faulty fuel selector or something.
Don't think so. You would need two faulty selectors to get a double engine failure.

Stick and Rudder's post indicates he knows what happened.
27/09 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.