Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

It's official.Flight training to be HECS as of may 08

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

It's official.Flight training to be HECS as of may 08

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2008, 00:18
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another flood??

The whole idea of having thousands of desperate, broke young CPL holders fighting for a few jobs in GA, just so the airlines have a great big pool to pick from is horribly wrong.
It does enormous harm to GA, which is just as important to the country as the major airlines.
The airlines must keep running sensible cadet schemes, and give some commitment to the people who are dedicating their lives to flying big aircraft. Planning ahead is necessary, and the airlines that do this will do better than those that do not.
The traditional "obscene lottery" is just that-obscene.
bushy is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 00:34
  #42 (permalink)  
Hasselhof
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was able to get an interest free loan from parents many moons ago
life is full of people who weren't born with a silver spoon in their mouth and might/would do a lot better than some who were lucky to have a rich daddy.
Wow, way to make things personal. How's that chip on your shoulder going? I still don't see why you think CPL level pilot training should be subsidised by the government. Systems like the one in NZ and the one I'm advocating sure have their problems but at least it levels the playing field. If the option had been availalbe to me I'd have taken it in a shot.
 
Old 28th Feb 2008, 01:45
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the things true, this is what I have been waiting for and thought would never come. I highly doubt those who say there will be an influx of idiots who have no commitment and decide to do it just because they now have the resources to do so. You may get some but I believe they will be far between, Lest We Forget that you still have to pay off everything in the end anyway! Anyone who can't see that coming has something to think about. And I also believe that if people are informed on the complete process of the scheme beforehand it will make the people who are doing it for kicks think again.

If your aware that you've just been given a 'suspended sentence' on the money so to speak your not going to rush at something you've thought little about just for the sake of it(especially when you have in excess of 50k knocking at your back door!)

And for those who are fair dinkum' people who have the commitment, passion and drive to get there then I say what a fantastic scheme although probably well overdue. They had to do something about the pilot shortage as many already have and I think its a step in the right direction. The pessimistic attitude of many here doesn't do anyone any favours especially the youngens.

Rant Over.
Jeps is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 02:55
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FL350
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another flood??
The whole idea of having thousands of desperate, broke young CPL holders fighting for a few jobs in GA, just so the airlines have a great big pool to pick from is horribly wrong
I completely agree.
Van Gough is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 03:06
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you rather? No pilots, or a flood of them? Besides nobody knows what affect this is going to have anyway, its mere hearsay and nothing more. There just seems to be no pleasing anyone, there really doesn't
Jeps is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 03:21
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: mascot
Age: 57
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, way to make things personal. How's that chip on your shoulder going? I still don't see why you think CPL level pilot training should be subsidised by the government.
mate no chip on my shoulder at all but it looks like the opposite might be true.

if i extend your argument then the government shouldn't subsidise medical students either pal.

what about those who have the ability but not the money?

you keep saying you don't see why the gov should subsidise training but you never say why.this seems to me nothing more than a snobby attitude and you have to be a member of the club.

i'll ask again what about all the other students at uni that the gov subsidises?
roamingwolf is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 04:12
  #47 (permalink)  
Hasselhof
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry but I'm not feeding this troll any more. I made my reason clear on page 2 and I'm not turning this thread into a 1 on 1 argument between people with clearly split ideologies.

Good luck to the wannabes that can take advantage of any new system that comes out, but read the fine print and make sure you're committed.
 
Old 28th Feb 2008, 04:38
  #48 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,440
Received 225 Likes on 120 Posts

Summary:
  • Commercial pilots that paid their own way don't want competition from perceived "freeloaders"; and
  • Kids that don't have rich Daddies would appreciate financial help to achieve their dreams.
Now can we move on - or has this thread run it's course?

Tail Wheel
tail wheel is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 08:55
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 35
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bout time! thats al i can say, looking farward to this!!
Captain Big Boy is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 09:57
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YLIL on my days off
Age: 50
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Facts from DEEWR

Hasselhof has the fact straight.

I may or may not work with the customer service centre for DEEWR (was DEST). This legislation was drafted by the Howard Govt last year and was put into parliment prior to the changeover. It is still going through as it was supported by both sides, expect May but it depends on what else goes before the Senate.

VET FEE-Help is aimed at RTOs (Registered Training Orginasitions) that are running Diploma and above courses (can you say integrated CPL courses?).

It provides for UP TO $80,000 in funding to the institution to be paid back by the student once employeed and earning over $xx (I don't have those figures to hand but they're the same payback rates as HECS used to be and FEE-HELP is now).

I see a lot of 150hr CPL couses turning into $80,000 govt. financed propositions.

Personally, I think it's good. It's not a free ride, it's a manner in which a student can get a loan they would have had to work their balls off for in the past while also trying to complete their education.

N.b. While interest free, it is indexed to CPI.

Flog.
flog is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 10:29
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dununda
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tail wheel

Well said my friend, I don't think there is too much more to add..
atminimums is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 12:22
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: melbourne
Age: 58
Posts: 1,105
Received 70 Likes on 36 Posts
A requirement for the schools to realistically promote flying training. Schools need to inform potential students of the realistic expected earnings in that first few years between flying school and achieving their ultimate goal. they need to be able to service the debt. Bearing in mind that if supply exceeds demand then there could be a reduction in what are already low incomes. Apart from that "' a big thumbs up"'
glenb is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 12:49
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?????

And do you think they will do that? Flying schools are commercial businesses, and the more they train the more profit they make. There has been a surplus of commercial pilots for decades. The job situation has never been as good as it is now since the mid sixties. There really is no shortage of CPL holders now either. It is about how it should be. Qualified people can get jobs.
Will it stay this way? Yes, for as long as it takes to train more.
It has been said that airlines select about one out of every hundred applicants.
I wish all the trainees well, and I can understand how HECS etc would be a great help. But do your research first. Are those golden, skygod jobs really so easy to get?
bushy is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2008, 22:31
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Somewhere in Indo...
Age: 48
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As previously mentioned, it is all about management of the scheme...

Here in NZ, prior to about 1999-2000, you could only get the academic portion of an aviation degree funded via loans... around $3000 worth of course fees per year... but the actual flying (something like $60k over 3 years) was out of your own pocket...

Then they changed the rules and fully funded aviation... this created the concept of 'Sausage Factories'... where schools were just trying to enrol as many people as possible (cue outrageous claims about flying jets after 18 months etc. etc) so they could milk the student loan funding...

This resulted in large amounts of dropouts with large loans and nothing to show for it, as well as new 200Hr CPLs with large loans who had no chance of getting a job (unless they were flipping burgers/pumping gas)...

So they changed the rules again... now schools are given X number of student loan placements for a year and they have to be more picky as the placements are reassessed based on student performance... ie. get a bunch of muppets in one year who all drop out/fail... and your placements get reduced...

This is why the schools are now running interviews/assessments and taking the cream... they have to be more selective about who they take.

Works out quite well from what I hear... Keen, dedicated and passionate people now have access to aviation regardless of personal circumstance...
HardCorePawn is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2008, 05:11
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes

This is the sort of thing we need, but the airlines should be involved in both the assessment and the financing. They should also be assessing the numbers they are likely to need.
bushy is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2008, 05:37
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im pretty sure at the numbers they will need and it aint pretty. Something like 250 a year for at least the next 6
Jeps is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2008, 06:18
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
250?

Rex are saying their cadet scheme will be expanded to train 300 per year.
bushy is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 11:27
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YLIL on my days off
Age: 50
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Progress - of a sort

Bit of a bump here but I got some more info today.

The VET-FEE-HELP scheme is still waiting to be ratified. As an RTO you can now register your interest with DEWA to find out more later.

Cheers,
Flog.
flog is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 11:56
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: YBBN
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this scheme would be at a perfect time for me, with me wanting to do my training pretty hard next year! (but don't have the monies)
PyroTek is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 12:12
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sydney
Age: 34
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flog can you please explain what DEWA stands for. Stupid question I know...
Speedbird 9 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.