Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Jetcraft new conditions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Feb 2007, 07:56
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
Received 250 Likes on 108 Posts
An AWA is an industrial instrument registered under Australian law, which must pass the “no disadvantage” test and provides for the terms, conditions and remuneration under which it engages it’s staff.
I believe that you will find that the no disadvantage test clause went up in a cloud of smoke last year. Have a look at the NJS AWA thread, award minimum for a 146/717 FO is about $69K but the AWA was $61K. There are now only five (I think) areas protected in an AWA, relativity to the award is NOT one of them.

Poto - as it happens I am not real keen on my employees being on PPrune talking about internal matters. People who've been around for any period of time would realise that our company has taken confidentiality clauses very seriously over the years
Yes we can't have the troops actually having a mechanism to talk to each other openly about the company without fear of retribution. A company with NOTHING to hide does NOT NEED confidentiality clauses. Please don't scream commercial reasons.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2007, 09:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wiggum. An AWA is an industrial instrument registered under Australian law, which must pass the “no disadvantage” test and provides for the terms, conditions and remuneration under which it engages it’s staff.
I have no connection with Jetcraft but it would appear that company is meeting it’s legal obligations under existing Australian industrial legislation – unlike a number of aviation related companies who blatantly exploit vulnerable staff with apparent impunity.
Should you have issue with the legislative framework which provides for Australian AWAs, may I suggest you pursue the matter direct with your elected representative, not the company and not in this thread?
Nice try Loose Wheel,
Whilst you try and sound intelligent and as if you know what you're on about, the fact is you have'nt a clue!
The no disadvantage test no longer exists, and just for the record, this particular company has a history of exploiting vulnerable staff with apparent impunity.
I speak from personal experience, so dont quote me any nonsense about this company meeting its" legal obligations" in regard to its employees.
Hans Solo is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2007, 08:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here here

Well done Danny.

Having no affiliation with you or your company I do however applaud you for your honest comments. GA is tuff, costs are high and if people don't like their conditions, talk to the company and negotiate or leave. You are never going to stop whingers. Some people just can't be pleased and others don't appreciate oportunities given. However some do and those you find don't post and complain. Keep up the good work.
natbanger is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.