Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Diesel, the fuel of the future!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2006, 03:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 905
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Diesel, the fuel of the future!!

Just had a read of the latest wheels magazine. Audi's R10 TDI won the 2006 24hr Le Mans carrace. Beat the likes of Porsche, Farrari, BMW, renault et al. Intersting point is this car was a 5.5 ltr twin turbo DIESEL.

For the first time. the Audi engineers cracked the secret to make the engine block out of aluminium, previously all diesel engine blocks were made of cast iron. The fuel injectors fed fuel into the cylinders at an incredible 29,000 psi.

Apart from being the fastest car outright round the circuit, its fuel economy averaging 43.5 ltrs per 100 km v's the petrol engine version at 51.4 ltrs per 100 km. All this while producing 485 kw, so it needed fewer fuel stops during the race.

This technology is still in its infancy comparatively, they recon that petrol engines have advanced about as far as they will ever go. Diesel technology to ultimately surplant petrol as the no 1 car engine.

Just imagine this technology applied to GA aircraft. Thialerts Diesel V8 being a good example.

Interesting times ahead.
nomorecatering is online now  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 03:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think you will have to imagine very long. I can't see Avgas being around for much longer.
Vee Won Kutt is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 05:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought hydrogen would be the fuel of the future - clean and there are oceans of it
Over and gout is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 07:01
  #4 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nuclear will be the way to go.

Dual cold fusion reduction thermo plastic terminator reactors are being developed as we speak.
Using novel twin overhead Thronomisters first flight trials are expected soon.
It is expected the engines will only need refueling every ten thousand years
Katherine (Tindal) airport is to be expanded and made secure as the one and only airport in the world the aircraft will operate from initially.
tinpis is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 07:05
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 905
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Tinipis, very very funny............um 10,000 years,.............mmmmm how would you put that in minutes for your endurance??
nomorecatering is online now  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 07:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hydrogen? Mmmm. More distant future probably. Tricky to store. Highly flammable/reactive. Takes much more energy to produce than it provides at the moment.

At least diesel is a start. Readily available now. Less refining required. Less soot/particle emission with the latest technology. Way more mpg or km/l. And you can even brew your own! (which I'm sure tinpis would appreciate & already have half the gear for).
DutchRoll is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 07:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: C9-H6-N2-O2
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

Yes but with cold fusion they can't function without a flux capacitor. But they won't be invented till 2015 and we need something now
Toluene Diisocyanate is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 07:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 57
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Won't we be left scratching our heads even with diesel? When every last bit of jungle in Brazil has been cleared for soy beans and sugar cane; and we've pulled up all the wheat in Aus, Canada, USA & Russia to plant canola and sunflowers; we still won't be able to produce enough bio fuel.

Almost back to square one .....

Does anyone have a definitive answer of what the sustainable yield per hectare is for bio fuel crops?

I suppose it buys us time, at the expence of every square inch of arable land on the face of the good planet Earth?!?!?!?
Like This - Do That is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 07:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hydrogen? Mmmm. More distant future probably. Tricky to store. Highly flammable/reactive. Takes much more energy to produce than it provides at the moment.
Not quite true. I saw a thing on the TV not long back. It seems the South Africans expanded on a concept originally thought up by a Kiwi. The South Africans however seem to have actually got the technology working. It's called an Hydrocilator and it burns a hydrogen based fuel called hydrozine - significantly more suitable than pure hydrogen for a number of reasons, namely much more stable and a lot more 'bang' per unit mass.

Can't find a link for it on the NET, but they said both the Hydrocilator and fuel would be ready for production early next year. At this stage the company are resisting offers from the oil industry and the military, stating that it would prefer the technology to be available for all humanity. If it is viable the launch is expected on 01/04/2007, a date which was selected to coincide with the International day of the 'bent spoon'.

Vee Won Kutt is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 08:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Yeah those nuclear engines would be pretty swish! I reckon though in 2120 when they develop them the flying schools will still stick them in their same old Cessna 150's lol!!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 08:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"with some 420 gallons of ethanol produced per acre of corn versus only 60 gallons of biodiesel per acre of soybeans."
http://www.agbios.com/main.php?actio...wsItem&id=7684
mootyman is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 08:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Down a dark hole
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vee Won Kutt
It's called an Hydrocilator and it burns a hydrogen based fuel called hydrozine - significantly more suitable than pure hydrogen for a number of reasons, namely much more stable and a lot more 'bang' per unit mass.

And then there was the Horvarth Hydrogen Car launched in QLD about 30 yrs ago - never to be heard of again.

R
Ratshit is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 10:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The dark corner
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forget it

"Negative ion theory" Google it

This is where it should be..........


To many intellegent boys in the hay bailer, or minced and feed to the local livestock.

BP, Mobil, Shell they have the power to change it all. Instead they power their service stations with solar panels on the roof and claim to be green.

I say no more....for fear of mincing....
takingitfromfyfe is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 17:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by takingitfromfyfe
Forget it

"Negative ion theory" Google it

This is where it should be..........


To many intellegent boys in the hay bailer, or minced and feed to the local livestock.

BP, Mobil, Shell they have the power to change it all. Instead they power their service stations with solar panels on the roof and claim to be green.

I say no more....for fear of mincing....

Not forgetting zero point energy.....unlimited energy created from nothing
Over and gout is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 18:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The land down-under
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink The Horvath Hydrogen Car

I say old, chap... Steady on. The Horvath Hydrogen Car is oft mentioned. Why somebody mentioned on PPRUNE, oh, it seems like only yesterday.

DNC
Dick N. Cider is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2006, 05:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Vee Won Kutt
.a lot more 'bang' per unit mass.
Thats a major problem with a lot of these alternative fuels/energy systems
Deaf is online now  
Old 28th Jul 2006, 08:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Over and gout
Not forgetting zero point energy.....unlimited energy created from nothing

Apart from the problem that no-one has the slightest idea how to extract any of that energy.
There's a good chance that we may never be able to.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 14:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was reading something tonight actually about Cryogenic Hydrogen powered aircraft... seems the russians are already on it with the "Tupolev Tu-155" aircraft and "Tu-156" Liquid Natural Gas powered aircraft

more info from Tupolev themselves at

http://www.tupolev.ru/English/Show.asp?SectionID=82

Be sure to check out page 2
http://www.tupolev.ru/English/Show.a...onID=82&Page=2

Cargo-passenger TU-156 a/c was designed for optimization of airborne cryogenic fuel system during long-term operation and its certification and also for optimization of ground infra-structure. Cryogenic components of the aircraft will be installed on consequent serial Tupolev’s cryogenic aircraft.

The aircraft uses two fuels: aviation kerosene and liquefied natural gas which makes it possible to operate the aircraft from usual airfields and from airfields provided with LNG fueling systems.
TU-156 a/c is capable to carry 14 t of payload for distance 2600 km using LNG and for distance of 3300 km using LNG and kerosene. In rear portion of passenger cabin there is a ventilated compartment to receive a main cryogenic tank of 13 t capacity. Nose baggage compartment is provided with ventilated bay wherein trim cryogenic fuel tank is installed composed of two horizontal communicating vessels capable to receive 3.8 tones of LNG.

Substantially all technical publication and records have been issued for TU-156 a/c. NK-89 prototype engine and a number of other cryogenic components have been manufactured and are being tested

Design works have started to build on the basis of TU-334 a/c a short-range passenger TU-334K a/c powered by BR-710C engines. It will carry 102 passengers for the distance up to 2000 km at the altitude up to 10.6 km. The aircraft is fuelled with 7 t of LNG and 2 t of kerosene as fuel reserve. Main elements of cryogenic system can be taken from TU-156 a/c.

Looks like an exciting time to break the monopoly of Oil over transportation. Slightly humorous perhaps that it's the Russians which seem to be leading this research... I suppose "First Man in Space" wasn't their last -first- in aerospace... incidently I believe the Tu-155 actually first flew in 1989 with one of three engines powered by Hydrogen (other two by standard Jet A1 I assume)
musicalaviator is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 02:23
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: over the rainbow
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Avweb,this week,reports that the US Air Force is investigating the manufacture of "synthetic" fuel using coal or natural gas.Fortunately they won't have to look far for answers,a South African company,SASOL, is already on the case and has recently sold two coal to liquid conversion plants to the Chinese Government. Known reserves of black coal in Australia would provide a supply of liquid fuel in this country for the next 50 years at current diesel/petrol consumption rates.That could probably doubled if brown coal and natural gas were included in the equation.Unfortunately our Government is determined to save us by mandating the use of ethanol.Meanwhile natural gas and coal is exported to Japan and China at give-away prices.
LewC is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 02:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 92
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

And then there was the Horvarth Hydrogen Car launched in QLD about 30 yrs ago - never to be heard of again.
Hey wasn't that the one that was to be shown to the world by Jo at some supermarket in QLD, but they couldn't fire it up because someone had lost the keys??
yarrayarra is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.