Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Alternate Aerodromes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2003, 12:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alternate Aerodromes

Hi,

Under IFR, can you treat an aerodrome that has a GPS NPA only without a TAF as a no aid aerodrome? That is, can you plan to go there by day without providing for an alternate if all met requirements are met (ie <SCT cloud below LSALT+500, 8kms vis etc)?

The Jepps/AIP indicate that you must provide for an alternate if the aerodrome has a prescribed instrument approach and a TAF is unavailable. Question refers to aeroplanes >5700 kg MTOW.

Thanks

RAIM
RAIM is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2003, 20:31
  #2 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,179
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Yes

You have VFR conditions.

SWH
swh is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2003, 16:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 52
Posts: 845
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
I stand to be corrected, but here is another angle and I'm assuming you are rated and recent on the GPS/NPA.

Alternate Aerodrome requirements are made up of General, Weather Conditions, Radio Navigation Aids and Runway Lighting.

I agree with swh in that yes you are cool with regards to Radio Navigation Aids but look closer at General and Weather Conditions.

General- When an aerodrome forecast is not available or is "provisional", the pilot in command must make provision for a suitable alternate that has a firm forecast.

Weather Conditions- For IFR flights the alternate minima are as follows: b. For aerodromes with an instrument approach procedure where an aerodrome forecast is unavailable or is "provisional", the pilot in command must make provision for a suitable alternate.

If your not GPS/NPA approved then things become interesting, if you take the wording 'litterally' then you still need an alternate. I see your frustration and you could probably argue "even though the aerodrome has an instrument approach, I am not rated on it so cant I just assume this to be an aerodrome without an instrument approach" and then apply 'Jeppesen' AU-304 3.2.11 c. Although you still have to get around that requirement that I mentioned above in 'General-Alternate Aerodrome requirements'.

Food for thought, hoss

Last edited by hoss; 11th Oct 2003 at 19:38.
hoss is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.