UAL Furloughs..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: hoschton, GA, USA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UAL Furloughs..
Another 600 to hit the street soon.
844 on the street already.
The active pilot population is expected to trend down to about 7800 from slightly over 10,000
Fleet plan is 520 aircraft, 400 Narrow bodies and about 120 widebodies. A 767 is not considered a widebody at UAL for pay purposes.
It wouldn't surprise me if there was another 1000 laid off in 2003 - this is just my two cents, but for every 3 RJs delivered the Mainline loses another station. The Company Word has it that every station within 700 miles of a hub that is not a hub will be RJ Express.
All of the 767-200s to be grounded, and only to operate 20 of the 747-400's.
Right now the pilots are voting on ERP II (Economic Recovery Plan) which includs an 18 % pay cut........
And I think it will pass.
For me, a 17 Year 767 Captain, goes from $242.55 to $197.05 per hour. Fortunately, I never owned a new car in my life and I never bought the Captains house, so I will be ok. Just three lazy ex wives to support.
844 on the street already.
The active pilot population is expected to trend down to about 7800 from slightly over 10,000
Fleet plan is 520 aircraft, 400 Narrow bodies and about 120 widebodies. A 767 is not considered a widebody at UAL for pay purposes.
It wouldn't surprise me if there was another 1000 laid off in 2003 - this is just my two cents, but for every 3 RJs delivered the Mainline loses another station. The Company Word has it that every station within 700 miles of a hub that is not a hub will be RJ Express.
All of the 767-200s to be grounded, and only to operate 20 of the 747-400's.
Right now the pilots are voting on ERP II (Economic Recovery Plan) which includs an 18 % pay cut........
And I think it will pass.
For me, a 17 Year 767 Captain, goes from $242.55 to $197.05 per hour. Fortunately, I never owned a new car in my life and I never bought the Captains house, so I will be ok. Just three lazy ex wives to support.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Here and There
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A-V-8R,
funny how you write about 3 ex-wifes. But, ironically, I have to meet yet a wide-body captain, who does not have an ex-wife. I don't think, it will happen.
Anyway, a funny but very real reason, why pilots should earn much more than they do. Ex-wifes are VERY expensive.
Cheers
funny how you write about 3 ex-wifes. But, ironically, I have to meet yet a wide-body captain, who does not have an ex-wife. I don't think, it will happen.
Anyway, a funny but very real reason, why pilots should earn much more than they do. Ex-wifes are VERY expensive.
Cheers
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 57
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A-V-8R,
Just curious to know what your thoughts are for the future of UAL.
Was this something that was destined to happen, based on huge salaries and an over reliance on the business pax?
We seem to see the airlines hit financial woes every few years but none seem to change the way they do business.
I'm going to guess that if UAL survives then it will take another 4-5 years to recover.
Over to you.
Just curious to know what your thoughts are for the future of UAL.
Was this something that was destined to happen, based on huge salaries and an over reliance on the business pax?
We seem to see the airlines hit financial woes every few years but none seem to change the way they do business.
I'm going to guess that if UAL survives then it will take another 4-5 years to recover.
Over to you.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: hoschton, GA, USA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saudi PC,
Overall, I think that UAL as an Airline will not exist in five years.
I think that the salaries were not the reason for the troubles at UAL.....
It might surprise you, but there was a time when United pilots volunteered to fly *FREE* for one day a month. Management declined the offer.
And the salaries certainly won't be a problem with the ERP II
That there is much more going on than meets the eye with the transfer of flying to the Express carriers, both at my company and other US carriers as well.
Over 5 billion dollars was wasted by UAL Management in the last 3 years. The US AIR Merger, which was nothing but an attempt to pay "structure fees" to the CEO's of both companies for concluding the deal. Hundreds of millions of dollars were to be paid there.
The failed AVOLAR, a businessjet operation. Just folded up and tanked, and now the company is being sued for all the aircraft it ordered but will never buy. After the first cash assistance from the goverment after 911 UAL cut a check out of it to buy business jets.
I could go on and on, but UAL Corporation, as opposed to UAL Air Line, is transforming itself from operating an Airline to operating a Ticketing Agency, selling tickets for scheduled air travel on aircraft it does not operate, either thru the express operation or the Deathstar Alliance.
Notice I did not say aircraft owned, for United has provided the financing for Express Operators to buy RJ's and paid their crew training costs.
(You think I think the Deathstar Alliance is bad? Just do some research on what Oneworld has done to their pilot forces...Just a hint of things to come for the Deathstar pilots.)
Then there is the problem of stock. Many people have sold short, but the problem is that as an ESOP company, stock was lent to sell short that was not in existence. Right now the SEC is looking into this; search Yahoo business for United and short selling for the complete story.
There is no business plan at United, except to shrink until profitablility. That will not happen, as it did not at Pan Am and TWA. Eastern was a different story, with the upstreaming of cash to Continental and the subsequent looting of the airline.
Remember, there is a fundamental difference between UAL Corp and United Air Lines. United Air Lines is a subsidary of UAL Corp, who is calling the shots.
United could run a profitable airline, if they change from a Travel Agency to an airline. Imagine what would happen if we yanked first class out of all the narrowbodies, increased the seat pitch, utilized the aircraft ten hours a day, and charged $39.00 a seat for an hour flight.
Do you think the furloughed UAL pilots would fly at the same wages as SW or Jet Blue? You bet they would.....
There would be no more Southwest or Jet Blue. They could not compete with the economies of scale.
Overall, I think that UAL as an Airline will not exist in five years.
I think that the salaries were not the reason for the troubles at UAL.....
It might surprise you, but there was a time when United pilots volunteered to fly *FREE* for one day a month. Management declined the offer.
And the salaries certainly won't be a problem with the ERP II
That there is much more going on than meets the eye with the transfer of flying to the Express carriers, both at my company and other US carriers as well.
Over 5 billion dollars was wasted by UAL Management in the last 3 years. The US AIR Merger, which was nothing but an attempt to pay "structure fees" to the CEO's of both companies for concluding the deal. Hundreds of millions of dollars were to be paid there.
The failed AVOLAR, a businessjet operation. Just folded up and tanked, and now the company is being sued for all the aircraft it ordered but will never buy. After the first cash assistance from the goverment after 911 UAL cut a check out of it to buy business jets.
I could go on and on, but UAL Corporation, as opposed to UAL Air Line, is transforming itself from operating an Airline to operating a Ticketing Agency, selling tickets for scheduled air travel on aircraft it does not operate, either thru the express operation or the Deathstar Alliance.
Notice I did not say aircraft owned, for United has provided the financing for Express Operators to buy RJ's and paid their crew training costs.
(You think I think the Deathstar Alliance is bad? Just do some research on what Oneworld has done to their pilot forces...Just a hint of things to come for the Deathstar pilots.)
Then there is the problem of stock. Many people have sold short, but the problem is that as an ESOP company, stock was lent to sell short that was not in existence. Right now the SEC is looking into this; search Yahoo business for United and short selling for the complete story.
There is no business plan at United, except to shrink until profitablility. That will not happen, as it did not at Pan Am and TWA. Eastern was a different story, with the upstreaming of cash to Continental and the subsequent looting of the airline.
Remember, there is a fundamental difference between UAL Corp and United Air Lines. United Air Lines is a subsidary of UAL Corp, who is calling the shots.
United could run a profitable airline, if they change from a Travel Agency to an airline. Imagine what would happen if we yanked first class out of all the narrowbodies, increased the seat pitch, utilized the aircraft ten hours a day, and charged $39.00 a seat for an hour flight.
Do you think the furloughed UAL pilots would fly at the same wages as SW or Jet Blue? You bet they would.....
There would be no more Southwest or Jet Blue. They could not compete with the economies of scale.
I had an arsehole transplant but the arsehole rejected me, which is why I write such rubbish
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A-V-8R
My friend;
The significant difference between Jet Blue and Southwest is they were founded as low-cost airlines with a business plan. United is the exact opposite. It will literally take years to transform United to a new business model. My main fear is that United will be long gone before we get to enjoy the fruits of their labor if that's the avenue they decide to follow.
One very upset Premier-Exec member;
Take care;
Andy
The significant difference between Jet Blue and Southwest is they were founded as low-cost airlines with a business plan. United is the exact opposite. It will literally take years to transform United to a new business model. My main fear is that United will be long gone before we get to enjoy the fruits of their labor if that's the avenue they decide to follow.
One very upset Premier-Exec member;
Take care;
Andy
The generic newspaper "USA Today", in the business section article on UAL, stated that the federal ATSB, which loans money to airlines (and is way 'too big for its britches', in my opinion, presuming to tell the unions indirectly, what sort of pay cuts are needed...as if THEY were upper mgmt...talk about government meddling in private industry...so much for 'de'-regulation !) released a letter to the public, in which it supposedly revealed UAL's or United's lack of an adequate business plan for the airline. Or at least this was my impression from having read it.
Why would the ATSB leak such confidential information? To embarass UAL? I read this during a two-hour stop in PHL, and was/am still wishing the best also for good old USAirways.
Good luck, UAL employees-
Why would the ATSB leak such confidential information? To embarass UAL? I read this during a two-hour stop in PHL, and was/am still wishing the best also for good old USAirways.
Good luck, UAL employees-
Last edited by Ignition Override; 13th Nov 2002 at 06:08.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the ATSB, IgnitionOverride, it never should have been established in the first place...either that OR it should have been handing out funds to ALL carriers. National is an example, suspect that they "would" have had a better prospect to survive (than UAL) if funded.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 57
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A-V-8R,
It is all very sad but it does not sound like you are surprized by what is happening. With luck perhaps this shake up will result with a healthy industry, but it looks like I should not hold my breath for that to happen.
There is a saying we had in the Air Force which is "You will be promoted to the level of your incompetency" Seems alot of CEO's fit that profile.
Best of luck
It is all very sad but it does not sound like you are surprized by what is happening. With luck perhaps this shake up will result with a healthy industry, but it looks like I should not hold my breath for that to happen.
There is a saying we had in the Air Force which is "You will be promoted to the level of your incompetency" Seems alot of CEO's fit that profile.
Best of luck
Union Goon
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately it is impossible to shrink an airline to profitability.
Yes you can lay off people and slash salaries. Its a drop in the bucket. The big structural costs remain. If you lay off pilots and ground aircraft, you still have to pay the mortgage on the aircraft, the rent on the gates, the insurance etc.
The list goes on. So when you shrink an airline, even if you enforce draconian pay cuts, your seat mile costs continue to rise making you even less competative.
Every major recession has a dead airline buried at the bottom of them, as that is the only thing that will fix the industry. What the ATSB has done is preserve the two airlines that would have gone this time (America west and USAir) and irreperably harmed the balance sheet of the rest of the industry as a result.
Its not just the business ticket reliance that is the problem. It is the nature of the industry, and the industry would have continued to function has it has had the government not interferred. The big network carriers provide a service that the Southwest's and the JetBlue's never can and that is the ability to connect any two cities in the world with one stop. If you want to go from Long island to Los Angeles on SOuthwest, you can do it, but its about 6 stops...
Unfortunately those big networks which are so valuable to business are expensive and the ablity to make a misstep is enourmous. They do provide an important service however, which everyone is overlooking right now.
Cheers
Wino
Yes you can lay off people and slash salaries. Its a drop in the bucket. The big structural costs remain. If you lay off pilots and ground aircraft, you still have to pay the mortgage on the aircraft, the rent on the gates, the insurance etc.
The list goes on. So when you shrink an airline, even if you enforce draconian pay cuts, your seat mile costs continue to rise making you even less competative.
Every major recession has a dead airline buried at the bottom of them, as that is the only thing that will fix the industry. What the ATSB has done is preserve the two airlines that would have gone this time (America west and USAir) and irreperably harmed the balance sheet of the rest of the industry as a result.
Its not just the business ticket reliance that is the problem. It is the nature of the industry, and the industry would have continued to function has it has had the government not interferred. The big network carriers provide a service that the Southwest's and the JetBlue's never can and that is the ability to connect any two cities in the world with one stop. If you want to go from Long island to Los Angeles on SOuthwest, you can do it, but its about 6 stops...
Unfortunately those big networks which are so valuable to business are expensive and the ablity to make a misstep is enourmous. They do provide an important service however, which everyone is overlooking right now.
Cheers
Wino
The problem comes when you try to find enough paying passengers to justify those expensive services.
And $197.05 an hour? Consider Virgin Atlantic pays a 744 Captain $95000 a year - and made a loss post 9/11. Not saying a 744 Captain doesn't deserve that sort of cash - I'm just trying to put it in perspective.
And $197.05 an hour? Consider Virgin Atlantic pays a 744 Captain $95000 a year - and made a loss post 9/11. Not saying a 744 Captain doesn't deserve that sort of cash - I'm just trying to put it in perspective.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ballymun
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wino, very good post. I heard the US airline industry could lose an airline the size of Continental , and it would not be missed as there is that much over capacity in the market.
The US Government loans are damaging the industry beyond belief, keeping afloat too many carriers, skewing the normal business models, and more carriers will fall into the abyss due to this tampering with the normal laws of business.
At least in Europe governmemt subsidies are banned to ensure the survival of the fittest, the industry over here in general being better for it.
The US Government loans are damaging the industry beyond belief, keeping afloat too many carriers, skewing the normal business models, and more carriers will fall into the abyss due to this tampering with the normal laws of business.
At least in Europe governmemt subsidies are banned to ensure the survival of the fittest, the industry over here in general being better for it.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
>>EAL weny under thanks to the IAM and ALPA. Col.Borman was forced by these unions to go to Frank Lorenzo.Then,only then did CAL milk,rape and destroy EAL.<<
That's a politically incorrect version of the events, but so very true...
And Hank Duffy, a Delta captain, was leading the ALPA cheers from the sidelines. "Hold the line brother..." At least Randy Babbitt got a job out of the deal.
It is supreme irony to see UAL on their knees begging for a government bailout after they argued so forcefully against help for Pan Am a decade ago.
The ERP II document is geared totally toward getting the ATSB bailout, in fact it is void if the bailout doesn't come. "The commitments in this letter shall not become effective except upon the funding the ATSB loan." it says.
If UAL gets the ATSB bailout but still goes chapter 11, UAL agrees not to try to void the contract for at least a year. However, there is more than a little wiggle room in the line that says "...In the event of a war in Iraq or a sudden, unforeseen event that substantially disrupts air travel (e.g., an act of God, act or threat of terrorism, war or government sanction), the commitment contained in the preceding paragraph will become null and void in its entirety..."
This late in the game, anything is worth a try...
That's a politically incorrect version of the events, but so very true...
And Hank Duffy, a Delta captain, was leading the ALPA cheers from the sidelines. "Hold the line brother..." At least Randy Babbitt got a job out of the deal.
It is supreme irony to see UAL on their knees begging for a government bailout after they argued so forcefully against help for Pan Am a decade ago.
The ERP II document is geared totally toward getting the ATSB bailout, in fact it is void if the bailout doesn't come. "The commitments in this letter shall not become effective except upon the funding the ATSB loan." it says.
If UAL gets the ATSB bailout but still goes chapter 11, UAL agrees not to try to void the contract for at least a year. However, there is more than a little wiggle room in the line that says "...In the event of a war in Iraq or a sudden, unforeseen event that substantially disrupts air travel (e.g., an act of God, act or threat of terrorism, war or government sanction), the commitment contained in the preceding paragraph will become null and void in its entirety..."
This late in the game, anything is worth a try...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Redistributing SLF
Age: 65
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, but the Virgin pilots...
Gave up the extra $100k/yr. so they could fly with great looking FA's! The UAL guys deserve the extra money--ever seen a UA Int'l FA?:
TC
TC
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From Wino:
--------------------------------------------------
Fine bad example.
WIthout checking myself. HOw about SWF (Stewart Newburg) to San Fransisco.
But you get the idea...
--------------------------------------------------
Correct in that WN serves relatively few airports in the eastn and not SWF AFAIK. They do, however offer 3 services a day from many of their east-coast cities to LAX, and one a day to OAK, all with just a change of plane and no other stops. More service if allow one additional stop as well as the change of plane. You're right that WN has only recently even semi-seriously entered the transcontinental market.
Enough, and now back to UAL....
--------------------------------------------------
Fine bad example.
WIthout checking myself. HOw about SWF (Stewart Newburg) to San Fransisco.
But you get the idea...
--------------------------------------------------
Correct in that WN serves relatively few airports in the eastn and not SWF AFAIK. They do, however offer 3 services a day from many of their east-coast cities to LAX, and one a day to OAK, all with just a change of plane and no other stops. More service if allow one additional stop as well as the change of plane. You're right that WN has only recently even semi-seriously entered the transcontinental market.
Enough, and now back to UAL....
Guest
Posts: n/a
The difference is that UAL flies JFK to LAX in 767's, SW does it in 737's. Customer surveys claim that pax on the New York to LAX route prefer wide body aircraft. Apparently not enough pax prefer wide body aircraft enough to pay the extra ticket costs of UAL. You do not think pax would lie on a customer survey do you? Good Heavens!
Seriously, if UAL gets its ticket prices anywhere near to the low cost carriers why would anyone fly New York to the West Coast in a 737 at .75 when they can fly in a wide body at .80?
Seriously, if UAL gets its ticket prices anywhere near to the low cost carriers why would anyone fly New York to the West Coast in a 737 at .75 when they can fly in a wide body at .80?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
airbubba..accurate post about ual cabin crew...they night stopped a dulles-based 767 crew at the hotel we used in brussels, and the hotel receptionist once comment that "we are considering putting life-support machines in their rooms"...