PPRuNe Forums


North America Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th Dec 2017, 23:21   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 48
Posts: 1,024
I'm afraid that 24h after the fact this story still doesn't make any sense...

How did he end up on the wrong flight? Headcount, anyone?
How did they spot the issue 4 hours into the flight?
Why did they turn back?

This is really a weird one...
atakacs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 00:44   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: North by Northwest
Posts: 184
The brothers had 'similar' names but apparently not identical names and were both heading to Tokyo but on different airlines. I'll guess the brother in question was booked on UA32 which is scheduled to depart about an hour earlier.

Maybe a simple explanation but from a security perspective, if he had luggage on UA32 which was already in the air I would have expected that aircraft to divert as well. Either way you're correct - very strange and something doesn't quite add up.

Maybe he just didn't want to fly UAL - they've had a tough year

Last edited by b1lanc; 28th Dec 2017 at 01:15.
b1lanc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 05:51   #23 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In the back of a bus
Posts: 842
Headcount? On a widebody? not these days.

Most airlines have the barcode scanners to do that job, in 13 years I only ever did a headcount on planes under 50 pax, when remote boarding or when there were unaccounted for pax and the numbers didn't add up.

On a widebody, at a modern airport jetbridge with barcode ticket scanners, the responsibility is on the gate staff to match the count.

The crew at the door do check tickets yes, but with the way pax rush on like stampeding cattle and snatching the stub away barking their seat number, you're lucky to get a proper look. Personally I used to get a hold of the boarding pass and not let go til I could properly check it, but not all crew are that assertive. There could also be cultural issues or inexperienced crew in the equation too.
givemewings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 07:03   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 83
Posts: 1,463
Maybe the two guys weren't "Bad Boys", but it just proves that the real "Bad Boys" can do whatever they want to do whenever they want to do it, meanwhile we "honest injuns" have to put up with all the so-called "security" nonsense that makes flying such a drag these days.
ExSp33db1rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 07:16   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 7,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phalconphixer View Post
Damn good job Chrissie Teigen (who?) was on the flight or the whole stupid non-event might have passed off unnoticed...
After ANA had bribed the other 200+ passengers not to talk about it, you mean ?
DaveReidUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 08:40   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 48
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Headcount? On a widebody? not these days.
Ok - thought it was part of SOPs... I guess was another century.

Somehow they still managed to board more passengers than expected, which shows some quite splopy ground procedures.

Still, I don't quite understand how they came to the realisation that they had the guy on board after 4h (unless he volunteered the information) ? And still don't understand why they would turn back. If anything I would have expected the other flight with his unaccompanied luggage to divert. But why this flight ?

Quote:
After ANA had bribed the other 200+ passengers not to talk about it, you mean ?
Do you have any specifics to that effect ?
atakacs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 09:34   #27 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Planet Earth (sometimes)
Posts: 4,583
I think if you read back a bit you’ll see there might just have been a bit of in that comment about bribery....
wiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 09:34   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,927
Quote:
The men from Mars must be looking down and deciding that now is the time to invade!
I beg to differ. I think they have decided that the way earthlings act, planet Earth must consist of strange and dangerous gasses and best be given a wide berth!
Hotel Tango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 12:40   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 462
And why is there any security issue at all? LAX has central security; afaik all passengers go through the same security regardless of destination, and all other people on airside will have been screened as well; no problem that the passengers was intended on another flight.
So probably the issue is immigration at Japan.
Now if it had been the other way around (unintended passenger on it's way to the US) hell would break loose, perhaps that influenced the decision.
A taste of one's own medicine?

Last edited by golfyankeesierra; 28th Dec 2017 at 17:19.
golfyankeesierra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 17:16   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,089
It happens from time to time

One elderly couple ended up in Sydney Nova Scotia on their way to Australia. Really the middle of nowhere unless you are connecting to St Pierre et Miquelon

A boy not much over the UM age in San Diego boarded a flight to Auckland instead of Oakland with some assistance from the Kiwi accent
RatherBeFlying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Dec 2017, 22:47   #31 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 21
The boy was 22 apparently.
Oakland, He Said, but He Went to Auckland Instead - latimes
Preemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th Dec 2017, 15:00   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 564
Quote:
Oakland, He Said, but He Went to Aukland Instead
I've seen Oakland. He should have kept quiet, stayed in NZ and counted his blessings.
EEngr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th Dec 2017, 15:51   #33 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: home
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by givemewings View Post
Headcount? On a widebody? not these days.
Seen that many times. Most recent was, I think, boarding a Thai Airlines intercontinental flight. They used handheld tally counters.
lapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th Dec 2017, 20:46   #34 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 54
Posts: 1,075
Well, it is, after all, their airplane.
A Squared is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 11:57   #35 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 10
I once boarded a flight from Montego bay to Kingston with a friend. We had been travelling for around 40 hours and were unaware of a hour's time difference from previous airport and arrived at the gate an hour early. bags were checked and a security guy dropped an expensive camera just in front of us. I guess that's why they didn't really look at our boarding passes. On board I found my seat occupied and thought I was getting an upgrade because the flight was overbooked but they kicked us off because we were on a flight back to the US. My friend's seat was free and if mine would have been too I think it would have taken at least an hour before I would have realized I was on the wrong plane.... These days boarding passes are scanned...
saffi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th Jan 2018, 04:09   #36 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackieofalltrades View Post
I wonder why they didn't divert to a closer airport such as Seattle or San Francisco, both of which are regular destinations for All Nippon and so would have ground staff capable of handling the plane.
If they had landed anywhere else in the states they would most likely not be able to operate to Japan because of flight hour limits. Going back to base meant that the chances of getting a crew together would be better.

I'm not saying that the decision to return was correct.. for some countries it can be a nightmare (Eg Indonesia, India, Nigeria....) but I would have thought Japan was ok as they have good relations with the states.

Anilv
Anilv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th Jan 2018, 06:22   #37 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 95
My best guess (and it's just a guess) is that one of the brothers bought a refundable ticket on UA,checked in to get past security, and then cancelled his reservation. The other brother then maybe printed his boarding pass twice so they both could use it. When the second one went to board, the scanner beeped that he already had gone past, which was probably dismissed as a glitch since there he was standing there with his passport matching the last name on the boarding pass. I don't know why they returned, but one advantage of doing so was that they could be arrested, since the "crime" occurred in the US before they boarded.
Long Haul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th Jan 2018, 23:07   #38 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,048
A story back before the days of security, when Continental flew the Pacific with DC-10's.

Boarded the aircraft at Honolulu bound for Melbourne, the welcome aboard announcement was made "for the flight to Sydney". Immediately all hands went up crying "we're going to Melbourne". Announcement made "you're all on the wrong aircraft, you should be on the one parked next to us". Much kerfuffle for a period of time until it was decided we were on the correct aircraft. Always wondered if the crew got their respective aircraft mixed.
megan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th Jan 2018, 21:46   #39 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Island Paradise
Posts: 94
Remember this one? They did not make a gate change announcement in French. How do you spell San Francisco in French?

https://viewfromthewing.boardingarea...ine-says-oops/
Koan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:38.


© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1