Wikiposts
Search
Nordic Forum It smells a bit of snow and ice and big hairy vikings chasing lusty maidens around after lots of mjød and loud partying. Forum languages are Svenska, Dansk, Norsk & English.

Idiotisk JAA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th May 2008, 17:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: OH, USA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I truly do understand your frustration, but lets face it, you are better off taking a few months to study and sit these exams. They are realy not that much different from the FAA ones.


I'm also going to have to disagree with you on this one. If you are going to take the FAA ATP written exam all you need is $70 for a CD that gives you all the questions and all the answers. You study hard over a weekend and take the exam on Monday.
I'm not sure what the going rate is for taking the FAA exam is ($90 would be my guess), but I'm pretty sure it's a less than the JAA exam. I was quoted NOK7000 last summer for the JAA. Not to mention the 14 books and the fact that self study is not recommended. If you do a study course through a school the total price in NOK will probably be around 40000.

Not only is it frustrating, but I feel I've paid enough to get were I am at the moment and now all that knowledge and experience I have accumulated is next to worthless.

You are right in one thing though: Put up or shut up! It is what it is and if you are planning to get a JAA certificate this is what it takes. I am glad to see that at least the two agencies are at least talking about changing the current system.
Wannagohome is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 01:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Freightdog: I agree to most of your frustration about JAR licencing, and lack of coordination between JAR and FAR, but most of the flight related personnell I have talked to in "Tilsynet" are former colleagues from WF, BU and SAS, with pre-retirement, and not leisure Cessna pilots..!

But most important: Why should "...say 3-4000 hours multi crew experience from larger jets..." give you any advantage over a pilot with the same amount of flying time on a heavy turboprop...? "Say 3-4000 hours multi crew experience from DHC8-Q400"...............? Because ANY backyard freight company give much better training than major regional companies, og because YOU are flying a "larger jet"....?
Hanguren is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 06:25
  #23 (permalink)  

Aviator
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Norveg
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are going to take the FAA ATP written exam all you need is $70 for a CD that gives you all the questions and all the answers. You study hard over a weekend and take the exam on Monday
...now that sounds like quality education?
Crossunder is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 07:01
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Offset in the fjords
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're talking about a profession here guys. For professionals. The ATPL is the highest education one can get as a pilot, and should not be a weekend course at the equivalent cost of a bag of doughnuts. It should not be a human right to get a professional license, even though a lot of us seem to think it is ok that the market is flooding over with fresh pilots from the FAA system with 200 hours, willing to pay whatever asked for a typerating, then landing a job you should have gotten as an experienced pilot. As long as there are too many pilots, salaries will not tend to rise either.

Pay peanuts, get monkeys. (or the other way around...)

And FAA vs JAA education is like comparing a Lada to a Rolls Ha!
Fokkersnagger is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 10:29
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: @ some hotel far away from everything
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what would happen if there were a common license covering the US and EU? Would the FAA accept the ATPL theory and exams, or would the JAA have to loosen up the noose quite a bit?

FAA training is more pilot friendly, no doubt, but it also depends on whether you`re doing it under Part 61 or Part 141. If you attend groundschools in stead of homeschool then the FAA under 141 requires a certain curriculum. But the final exam is the same whichever way you choose to go. The biggest "prblem" with the FAA way is that you can ufortunately get the Qs and As for around $20. On the other hand, the oral exam part of the checkride can be a breeze if you`re up on your theory, or it can be hell if you`ve just memorized the answers for the multiple-guess exam. Having both FAA and JAA tickets I`ve found that the JAA oral exam is nothing compared to the FAA one, so that sort of evens things out a bit
Guttn is offline  
Old 16th May 2008, 04:42
  #26 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 1 Post
And FAA vs JAA education is like comparing a Lada to a Rolls Ha!
Hmm, here we go again: Mr. Numbnuts airing his opinion..

First of all there is no education given by the FAA or the JAA, rather some government pencil-pushers setting standards and testing candidates to make sure they meet the standards. (Or lack of)

Having been designated by the FAA to give Line Checks and training for Capt. or F/O positions on the B-747 and a few other airplanes, I have been there and seen it on this side of the world.
Belive me Mr. Amateur, there is no difference in the certification system as far as the talent of the airmen:

You can study JAA books untill the cows come home, but you will not be a better pilot than Mr. Redneck who have never been to your college, but who can stay awake and land a crippled bird in bad weather.
What matters is from the outer-marker inbound, not how clever you are kissing the JAA arses and taking their exams.

Not ****ting on the JAA pilots or their "Education", but rather the attitude of some guys who have obviously never gone for an FAA rating or a 121 check-ride.

I think a well-rounded pilot would lay low in the terrain and not crack jokes about Lada's or Rollses unless he knows more about flying than cars.
TowerDog is online now  
Old 16th May 2008, 09:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Offset in the fjords
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello again mr. Professional. You are right, as always. If you decide I am a numbnut, then so it is. Your nick should be TowerGod, and I'm here to worship you. But I'm probably not worthy, since I have been airing my brain, letting out stupid ideas that are not correct. I never took the FAA-orals, JAA-writtens, never even went to college, and obviously don't know a heck of a lot about cars either, hence I am and will always be an amateur. And I have a bad attitude not knowing the PARTs and the FARts apart. Sorry to irritate you. Cracking jokes about the US and A system is not acceptable, I understand now. Please forgive me for i have sinned. I will always be thankful that you took the time to reply to a lowlifer like me. From this day on my opinion is that everything and everyone from the US and A is superior and uncomparable to anything. Will also forget about the unthinkable dream to sit in a shiny big bird drinking coffee for 18 hours followed by 5 minutes actual flying from the outer marker and in. Got to go; the cows are coming home.

...sneaking out...
Fokkersnagger is offline  
Old 16th May 2008, 09:33
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well then

We have quite a few FAA pilots flying on validation, excluding a some really positive exceptions, most of are unfortunately what Tower Dog so elegantly called "Numb Nuts". Non-standard RT, SOP knowledge is limited, Non standard callouts like instead of "Glideslope Capture" it's Yeah we gliding down the slope or "Gear Down" becomes Dump the gear???? Limited knowledge on meteorology and ICAO procedures and the differences from FAA. I could continue the list on and on, but dont really see the purpose of it. This is not to say that JAA trained pilots do not ever do the same mistakes. Just something I have noted in the past years.

The famed pt121 checkride is no harder nor any easier than an OPC or LPC of a JAROPS1 operator. Standards required by the administrators be it FAA or JAA are about the same. Depending on the airline naturally the standard of training varies. There are some really substandard operators on both sides of the Atlantic and regardless of how good the airline is some goofballs sneak through the system. I recall "Magellan". A Captain that forgot to go to NAV/INS and left it in HDG on 747 while crossing the Atlantic a man that has passed the famed pt121 check with Tower Air! S.hit happens and it could have happened to anyone I guess.

Flyingwise both systems have produced good and bad pilots. But when it comes to the theoretical knowledge of flying and all matters involved, US is far behind the rest of the world and not just JAA. The difference of a Swedish or Nordic or European FO and a US equivalent is marked. There is no doubt that the JAA system as anal as it is, gives a better general knowledge on operating an aircraft than FAA does.

Experience is a totally different matter. You cannot substitue actual experience by reading books. To know something well it must be practiced in real life. However a good general knowledge, thorough theoretical training and eventually experience sounds like a pretty good mix to me.
Atlanta-Driver is offline  
Old 16th May 2008, 09:51
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Offset in the fjords
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Careful now, Atlanta-Driver, don't irritate the MasterGod, he might wake up from his Viking Bar hangover and humiliate you in public , with mature and Godly nicknames unheard of by non-rednecks... ssshhhhh
Fokkersnagger is offline  
Old 16th May 2008, 10:57
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Moss
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well put TD!! You made me pee my pants laughing again.

Check rides in the us are much tougher!

When it comes to the "written" test in the US, it's supposed to be by memory! Those of you who took the CFI should know that the first part of the learning prosess is memorization or rote learning. Rote, understanding, application, correlation. In that sequence! It's designed this way! Again, the difference between FAA, JAA and Luftfartstilsynet is clear looking at their web sites!

Empati
empati is offline  
Old 16th May 2008, 20:38
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
overboard

I do think it is far to say that there are 'bad apples' everywhere and if you search a bit for it you will find plenty of mistakes having been made by pilots all over the world. To think that one licensed group of pilots are superior to the other is crap.

The issue in this thread was why do an experienced pilot need to sit 14 exams if he or she shows up with multiple typeratings and thousands of hours of experience. In my humble opinion there should be on subject test that covers JAR rules and regulations, a system oral on the airplane and a flight check.

To say that there are pilots on validation flying and not making the proper call outs is unacceptable but who is allowing them to continue? Don't your company have a standards or training department that nips that in the butt?

All the best to those that choose the 14 exams convertion route!
jetflyger is offline  
Old 17th May 2008, 04:01
  #32 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 1 Post
I recall "Magellan". A Captain that forgot to go to NAV/INS and left it in HDG on 747 while crossing the Atlantic a man that has passed the famed pt121 check with Tower Air! S.hit happens and it could have happened to anyone I guess.
Hmm, refresh my memory: I knew some of the Tower Air guys and the problems over there, but the above does not ring a bell.

Your scenario however describes the Korean Air jumbo the Russians shot down in 1983.

There is no doubt that the JAA system as anal as it is, gives a better general knowledge on operating an aircraft than FAA does.
Congrats on your discovery and thanks for insight, and I assume you are going to give flying lessons to all FAA certified pilots because you have a better general knowledge?

But when it comes to the theoretical knowledge of flying and all matters involved, US is far behind the rest of the world and not just JAA
Very arrogant, but if it feels good, go for it.....

don't irritate the MasterGod,
Aye, no MasterGod, just helping some of you JAA dudes with the heads up your arses see the occasional sunshine..Wasting my time?
TowerDog is online now  
Old 17th May 2008, 04:05
  #33 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 1 Post
Cracking jokes about the US and A system is not acceptable, I understand now. Please forgive me for i have sinned. I will always be thankful that you took the time to reply to a lowlifer like me. From this day on my opinion is that everything and everyone from the US and A is superior and uncomparable to anything.
Hmm, trying very hard to turn this around?

Sorry if I stepped on your toes, nothing personal.
TowerDog is online now  
Old 20th May 2008, 05:07
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: us
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SO Fokkerschnakker,

Where and what do you fly?
kattfan is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 06:02
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: us
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The biggest idiot I ever had as a student, has been with SAS for years. He was totally incompetent.
My best student was really super.He was everything you wanted in a crew member. He has also been with SAS for years.

I went to flight school almost a generation ago. It was not that tough probably compared to JAA. But you have a curriculum (Pensum) If you know it, you pass. What you are getting is only a piece of paper. With no experience, you have nothing.
Written tests are easy, orals are not. My ATP cost me 30 bucks, for the book. I went to the FAA for the ride. Trust me, they don't give it away. Still just a piece of paper.

Then you go to a 121 carrier.(Much later...) Your piece of paper better come with some stuff. All of us had thousands of hours in all kinds of airplanes. Initial training is tough, all your checkrides are hell. There is no prep for a PC. Cold in, and sweaty and bloody out. The hard part is not what you do every day, it is the things you never do and never get a chance to practise. But you must be proficient to pass the ride.

My point is this, Fokkersnapper. Sure some guys returned from the US with bad habits and bad SOP. That is however not a reflection of most US airlines' training, but more a reflection on themselves. Attitude is everything in this business, and I don't mean what you have.

Have lots of friends flying the fjords, and according to some, everything out of Bardufoss
isn't that great. 6-700 hundred does not buy what it used to.. Maybe a couple hundred more for the type to go with your 12 page logbook will do........
kattfan is offline  
Old 22nd May 2008, 21:53
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: @ some hotel far away from everything
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This has really just turned into another JAA vs FAA flightschool argument, whereas the threadstarter wanted to know why he has to sit some tough exams regarding his level of experience - most likeliy some of which is in JAA/EU airspace. And validation is a 1 year affair.

Just a quickie on RT.... Having lived in the States for many years, previously, I understand and can differntiate a lot of the dialects. Combine that with where you grew up, and what kind of people were around you (talking about class here), then one should easily be able to imagine why some people call insects critters and girls something else. BUT, the common denominator is that they all have English as their mother tongue, and it is not required, at least until ATP or international ops, that they hold a RT license. Try learning RT staccatto English to someone who already masters the language. Here in JAA`s backyard we are now graded in how well, or poorly, we speak English. . That too says a bit...
Guttn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.