![]() |
|
I saw a link to this on LinkedIn a few moments ago: Australia looking at existing design to ‘accelerate’ delivery of nuclear-powered submarines - The Sydney Morning Herald
Vice Admiral Meade said the government was “looking at a mature design” and that could “accelerate the delivery of the first submarine in Australia in the 2030s”. He said “at the moment the aperture is wide” but the taskforce over the next 18 months will “narrow down the aperture and get us to the optimal pathway”. |
I'd call this an escalation. It was on the world stage and puts it at another level. It was not just for domestic consumption. The dummy spit to end all dummy spits. I'm still surprised by Australian civil response. I would have declared war by now. :)
|
Thing is though - it's probably true.
|
But who cares if we offend a Frenchman? I blow my nose at you! I fart in your general direction!
|
Diplomacy is to do and say the nastiest thing in the nicest way.
|
Originally Posted by tartare
(Post 11135254)
Thing is though - it's probably true.
Personally, if that was me, I’d detail the timeline of events and go on to list the grievances and failings of the NG Subs. |
Morrison is starting to say what happened. It is well documented, that Australia was looking at canceling/not going forward with the contract some 18 months ago. A plan B
|
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
(Post 11135400)
Well, it’s back in Morrisons court now. Gloves are off so he can clearly release whatever details about how and when the French were advised, or he’s not got anything and then you’ll be right.
Personally, if that was me, I’d detail the timeline of events and go on to list the grievances and failings of the NG Subs. In September, two days before Mr Morrison announced the formation of the AUKUS alliance and was trying to set up a call with the French President to inform him of Australia’s decision to scrap the subs contract, Mr Macron messaged the Prime Minister to ask: “Should I expect good or bad news for our joint submarines ambitions?” On the day before the announcement, Mr Macron refused to take Mr Morrison’s call which, the federal government believes, was because he knew what it was about. Sounds a lot like what desperate X's do, if I dont pickup the phone we aren't broken up |
February 2021.
https://indaily.com.au/news/2021/02/...y-february-25/ Prime Minister Scott Morrison has ordered a top level study to look at how to terminate the $90 billion contract, while also investigating alternative options to contract Swedish Shipbuilders Saab Kockums or renovate the Australian Navy’s current Collins Class fleet. January 14, 2020 https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fede...14-p53rd2.htmlThe audit report also reveals that during negotiations over a key agreement with French company Naval Group in 2018, the federal government's hand-picked advisory group floated the idea of walking away from the contract with the French shipbuilder. The Naval Shipbuilding Advisory Board told Defence that it should consider whether proceeding with the project was in the national interest "even if negotiations succeeded" with the Strategic Partnering Agreement. Australia Reportedly Looking At An Alternative To Its Costly New French-Designed Submarines JANUARY 19, 2021 https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ned-submarines |
Originally Posted by rattman
(Post 11135414)
From the AFR https://www.afr.com/politics/federal...p594xrEmmanuel Macron warned Scott Morrison in June “I don’t like losing” after the Prime Minister informed him over dinner that Australia felt the French submarines were not fit for purpose.
In September, two days before Mr Morrison announced the formation of the AUKUS alliance and was trying to set up a call with the French President to inform him of Australia’s decision to scrap the subs contract, Mr Macron messaged the Prime Minister to ask: “Should I expect good or bad news for our joint submarines ambitions?” On the day before the announcement, Mr Macron refused to take Mr Morrison’s call which, the federal government believes, was because he knew what it was about. Sounds a lot like what desperate X's do, if I dont pickup the phone we aren't broken up Given the pressure on him domestically his response is exactly as to be expected. The one thing you can always count on French leaders to do when they don't get their own way is throw their toys out the pram. De Gaulle was a past master at it. |
Originally Posted by golder
(Post 11135412)
Morrison is starting to say what happened. It is well documented, that Australia was looking at canceling/not going forward with the contract some 18 months ago. A plan B
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI28p7OXRx0 |
Originally Posted by Davef68
(Post 11135623)
Quite impressed by a politician that can speak for 10 minutes on such a topic without any notes.
|
”Mr Morrison said the government would not “settle for less” and accept submarines that would be “obsolete before they hit the water“
This is in the detail yet in my opinion monumental. What advances are the CCP making in ASW to make the Barracuda obsolete by 2038? Macron is proving to be just another French saboteur of alliances. He's out of line and a mug. |
Just remember that the PLA(N) submarines might not be the super stealthy boats everyone seems to fear...
|
https://www.9news.com.au/national/sc...6-7d619e3ba97e
After he was branded a liar on camera by President Emmanuel Macron, Prime Minister Scott Morrison hit back, claiming the leaked text message, obtained by the Australian Financial Review, showed the French knew the submarine contract was at risk. Two days before the AUKUS coalition was set to be announced, with Mr Morrison reportedly trying to set up a call with Mr Macron to inform him the submarine deal was off, Mr Macron messaged Australia's prime minister to ask: "Should I expect good or bad news for our joint submarines ambitions?" "I must say that I think the statements that were made questioning Australia's integrity and the slurs that have been placed on Australia, not me, I've got broad shoulders. I can deal with that," he said. "But those slurs, I'm not going to cop sledging at Australia. "I'm not going to cop that on behalf of Australians." |
Macron is just using theatrics as a political ploy to play to the home crowd. The fallout would seem to be that Macron is the one lying. If he really has a problem he can send some members from the action branch of the Direction générale de la sécurité extérieure to plant some limpet mines on a Australian war ship in Sydney Harbour and perhaps kill some people in the process. Something they've done previously when upset (Rainbow Warrior in Aukland Harbour).
|
The original mistake was signing a contract with France in the first place. Turnbull and the RAN screwed up. Why would you do it ? Only if you haven’t read history. Macron ? Think De Gaulle post WW2.
Not even the pretence of cooperative behaviour. Looking after number one always. Soryu class was the obvious choice. Australian propensity for insisting on modifying everything to “local requirements “ screwed the deal. We dont demand variations or home build for the F35 so why for subs? Oh I forgot . Pork barrelling in South Australia. Thats what drives defence policy. Pathetic |
Originally Posted by megan
(Post 11135865)
Macron is just using theatrics as a political ploy to play to the home crowd. The fallout would seem to be that Macron is the one lying. If he really has a problem he can send some members from the action branch of the Direction générale de la sécurité extérieure to plant some limpet mines on a Australian war ship in Sydney Harbour and perhaps kill some people in the process. Something they've done previously when upset (Rainbow Warrior in Aukland Harbour).
|
"Pork barrelling in South Australia. That's what drives defence policy. Pathetic"
Same everywhere I'm afraid - F-4 Phantoms for the UK is a classic example. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.