PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Falcon to the edge of Russian airspace. (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/658194-falcon-edge-russian-airspace.html)

falcon900 15th Mar 2024 18:27

Falcon to the edge of Russian airspace.
 
Who could possibly have imagined that this could have happened?
Russians jamming Comms?? Well I never.
Strictly speaking we should be paying them for saving us from Grant Shapops for a few minutes I suppose…

TURIN 15th Mar 2024 18:29

I came here because I thought it was about the latest SpaceX launch going wrong. 😁

hunterboy 15th Mar 2024 18:53

The fact that the rest of us having been dealing with this for a couple of years has probably passed him by.

DogTailRed2 15th Mar 2024 18:54


Originally Posted by TURIN (Post 11616550)
I came here because I thought it was about the latest SpaceX launch going wrong. 😁

I came here because I thought SpaceX was trolling Russia from space. Now that would be cool.

Video Mixdown 15th Mar 2024 20:13

Are there really people on this thread who think commercial and military aircraft can’t navigate without GPS?

falcon900 15th Mar 2024 20:49


Originally Posted by Video Mixdown (Post 11616655)
Are there really people on this thread who think commercial and military aircraft can’t navigate without GPS?

You tell me.
I was responding to the naivety of the reporting which suggested that they were “blind”.
More to the point, the reporting that it couldn’t have happened to Air Force One ( which I believe it could not). I suspect it couldn’t have happened to the Voyager either. But yes , give the defence secretary a thrill by flying close to Russian airspace in essentially a business jet to save a few bob, and this is what will happen.
How the incident comes to be in the public domain might seem like a good question to some people too.

DogTailRed2 15th Mar 2024 20:49


Originally Posted by Video Mixdown (Post 11616655)
Are there really people on this thread who think commercial and military aircraft can’t navigate without GPS?

Looking at the accident thread, yes.

Video Mixdown 15th Mar 2024 21:49


Originally Posted by falcon900 (Post 11616672)
You tell me.
I was responding to the naivety of the reporting which suggested that they were “blind”.
More to the point, the reporting that it couldn’t have happened to Air Force One ( which I believe it could not). I suspect it couldn’t have happened to the Voyager either. But yes , give the defence secretary a thrill by flying close to Russian airspace in essentially a business jet to save a few bob, and this is what will happen.
How the incident comes to be in the public domain might seem like a good question to some people too.

There was no 'incident'. Just a hysterically inaccurate media story about something that has been happening for months.

sycamore 15th Mar 2024 22:07

He could always have gone in his own aeroplane(N Reg),taken a few dozen maps;;would have been able to claim a couple of night stops,`HOME-T0-Duty`mileage; might even have missed the border and ended up in Red Square...

bugged on the right 15th Mar 2024 22:24

Our boys would break out the periscopic sextant, warmed up the radio altimeter and continued bravely on using pressure pattern navigation and referring to ground features from their topos. No problem.

beardy 15th Mar 2024 23:48


Originally Posted by bugged on the right (Post 11616722)
Our boys would break out the periscopic sextant, warmed up the radio altimeter and continued bravely on using pressure pattern navigation and referring to ground features from their topos. No problem.

Works for me

TURIN 16th Mar 2024 01:06


Originally Posted by Video Mixdown (Post 11616697)
There was no 'incident'. Just a hysterically inaccurate media story about something that has been happening for months.

Absolutely. I caught the Sky News pundits reviewing the papers, the utter drivel one particular commentator spouted on this issue wasn't just laughable it was slanderous! I can only assume the rest of their reporting was just as bad on politics, business and sport too.

chevvron 16th Mar 2024 09:19


Originally Posted by falcon900 (Post 11616549)
Who could possibly have imagined that this could have happened?
Russians jamming Comms?? Well I never.
Strictly speaking we should be paying them for saving us from Grant Shapops for a few minutes I suppose…

What happened then? There was no video or link.

Asturias56 16th Mar 2024 09:27

"There was no 'incident'. Just a hysterically inaccurate media story about something that has been happening for months."


It's Shappes - never a man to miss an opportunity to grab a headline (or photo edit out his previous leader) - if it hadn't been the vile Russians it would have been "thunderstorms", or balloons, or little green men................

Video Mixdown 16th Mar 2024 09:32


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 11616983)
It's Shappes - never a man to miss an opportunity to grab a headline (or photo edit out his previous leader) - if it hadn't been the vile Russians it would have been "thunderstorms", or balloons, or little green men................

You talk yet say nothing. Why?

Fortissimo 16th Mar 2024 10:11


Originally Posted by falcon900 (Post 11616672)
You tell me.
I was responding to the naivety of the reporting which suggested that they were “blind”.
More to the point, the reporting that it couldn’t have happened to Air Force One ( which I believe it could not). I suspect it couldn’t have happened to the Voyager either. But yes , give the defence secretary a thrill by flying close to Russian airspace in essentially a business jet to save a few bob, and this is what will happen.
How the incident comes to be in the public domain might seem like a good question to some people too.

The answer on public domain is that there were journos on board. The hype is all about specific targeting of the aircraft, which is nonsense, as is the sensationalist language. And if the journos hadn’t known, a helpful Spad would probably have put them in the picture as a means of bigging up their man (tough task).

As others have pointed out, commercial traffic has been subject to this for some years now as spillover from Russian ops in Syria, Ukraine and Black Sea. The difference now is that the capability has moved from simple jamming to spoofing, which the major OEMs are working to prevent. The mil ops community has just not talked about it, for obvious reasons, but you can assume there is no immunity from receipt of a broadcast jam/spoof signal, the effects of that signal being unique to the system involved.

We can but hope the direct experience gives SofS a bit more empathy when it comes to agreeing procurement proposals.

Red Line Entry 16th Mar 2024 11:53

Perhaps some of our older colleagues could highlight the “mekoning” from the Cold War to remind us how this used to be a very real and deadly pastime.

Mogwi 16th Mar 2024 13:51

Indeed! Mekoning (or more correctly maeconing) was the re-broadcasting of navigation signals from a different location, to confuse unwary chaps. The classic case in the ‘70’s was an NDB (I think) in northern Germany that was “cloned” by the naughty Ruskies and re-broadcast at higher power to tempt the boys to head too far East.

As I remember, it caused quite a few “Brass Monkey” shouts but never an actual whoopsie.

Ah, heady days!

Mog

Thud_and_Blunder 16th Mar 2024 14:40

Not always a happy outcome - a C-130 was shot down by 4 MiGs over Armenia in September 1958 having probably been mekon'd into Sov airspace.

chevvron 16th Mar 2024 18:13


Originally Posted by Thud_and_Blunder (Post 11617170)
Not always a happy outcome - a C-130 was shot down by 4 MiGs over Armenia in September 1958 having probably been mekon'd into Sov airspace.

I recall reading about that one in 'RAF Flying Review' in the late ''50s or early '60s.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.