Surely the message here is not in the details of the contract or the specific tech transfers, rather it is that the US is actively disseminating nuclear technology in Australia/Asia.
China has done zip to halt the North Korean nuclear effort, so the US will help its friends to arm up correspondingly. South Korea, India, Japan and Taiwan are on the agenda, imho in that order. China will be deterred militarily, that is relatively easy. The commercial dependencies will be a lot more difficult to deal with. |
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 11114587)
"So what exactly has Australia to gain from AUKUS? I still fail to see there benefits."
SSN's can operate longer and safer further N than the diesel boats - unless you look at a map its hard to believe but China is actually closer to Finland than to Australia SSN's are hard to detect and can carry a serious conventional punch - they last a long time and, overall, are very flexible. It was SSN's that kept he Argentinean navy in port thru the Falklands War keep your friends close but your enemies closer! |
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 11114587)
"So what exactly has Australia to gain from AUKUS? I still fail to see there benefits."
SSN's can operate longer and safer further N than the diesel boats |
Originally Posted by Yellow Sun
(Post 11114615)
But the SSN has no limiting lines of submerged approach.
YS |
Originally Posted by henra
(Post 11114623)
SSN's can travel long distances fully submerged at high speeds and are thereby a tremendous danger to an opposing Overwater Fleet.
|
Count of Monte Bisto
Again, followers of history will know that it was the Brits who were the last to sink a ship with a submarine when HMS Conqueror (UK-built nuclear submarine with conventional torpedos) sunk the Belgrano in the Falklands War. |
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
(Post 11114668)
An SSN at speed is easy to track passively.
|
I think it's just possible I have something over 1000 hrs Nimrod. Your move.
|
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
(Post 11114611)
SSKs are a shed load harder to detect (until they snort) and can carry the same punch.
|
You tell me. You are obviously an expert.
|
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
(Post 11114685)
I think it's just possible I have something over 1000 hrs Nimrod. Your move.
|
The point is, even when they are quiet, SSNs make noise that can be tracked.
|
Not to suggest in any way that there is any implication of impropriety in this Australian deal, but consider the larger picture and history. It is easy to understand the outrage over this submarine deal that is now underwater, however, it is always worth considering the history of the righteous state-owned builder and some of their past deals? These implicate individuals at the highest levels of Government on both sides of the deal and have had major political and criminal implications that run for decades in some cases. The sums of money involved are staggering and there is no way they are paid without visibility at the highest levels of business and government.
https://corruption-tracker.org/case/...arine-contract https://corruption-tracker.org/case/...bmarine-affair https://corruption-tracker.org/case/laffaire-karachi https://corruption-tracker.org/case/...frigate-affair Corruption from other suppliers and countries remains a major issue in the arms business where huge amounts of money are involved, and the contemporary global compliance efforts must be wholeheartedly applauded. |
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
(Post 11114697)
The point is, even when they are quiet, SSNs make noise that can be tracked.
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
(Post 11114690)
You tell me. You are obviously an expert.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ubmarine-force |
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
(Post 11114666)
And is damned all use in littoral waters.
|
Oh FFS!
My point I merely pointed out that SSNs are easier to track than are SSKs, as you would know if you had ever had to do so. Get over yourselves. |
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
(Post 11114727)
Oh FFS!
My point I merely pointed out that SSNs are easier to track than are SSKs, as you would know if you had ever had to do so. Get over yourselves. However 2 big factors in favour of nuclear subs. Range and access to the whole suite of sensor technology etc. Range has always been a big issue for the RAN and is what probably what ruled out the German option. Five years ago the nuclear option was not on the table. As soon as it was it was a nobrainer. |
Didn't turball mention in memoirs that he picked the french because there was an option to change later deliveries back to nuclear subs
|
Anyone like to comment. Are we in the poo, the Fat Man is also complaining about the neuclearisation.
|
Originally Posted by megan
(Post 11114749)
Anyone like to comment. Are we in the poo, the Fat Man is also complaining about the neuclearisation.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.