PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   AUKUS (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/642689-aukus.html)

etudiant 21st Sep 2021 19:08

Surely the message here is not in the details of the contract or the specific tech transfers, rather it is that the US is actively disseminating nuclear technology in Australia/Asia.
China has done zip to halt the North Korean nuclear effort, so the US will help its friends to arm up correspondingly. South Korea, India, Japan and Taiwan are on the agenda, imho in that order.
China will be deterred militarily, that is relatively easy. The commercial dependencies will be a lot more difficult to deal with.

SaulGoodman 21st Sep 2021 19:23


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 11114587)
"So what exactly has Australia to gain from AUKUS? I still fail to see there benefits."

SSN's can operate longer and safer further N than the diesel boats - unless you look at a map its hard to believe but China is actually closer to Finland than to Australia

SSN's are hard to detect and can carry a serious conventional punch - they last a long time and, overall, are very flexible. It was SSN's that kept he Argentinean navy in port thru the Falklands War

I get that the hardware might be a little better (which they could have ordered instead anyway) but I still fail to see what the country of Australia has to gain. Don’t get me wrong, I am everything BUT a China fan but in my eyes AUKUS has changed Australia in an American vassal state with the risk of seriously pissing of their biggest trade partner.

keep your friends close but your enemies closer!

rattman 21st Sep 2021 19:35


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 11114587)
"So what exactly has Australia to gain from AUKUS? I still fail to see there benefits."

SSN's can operate longer and safer further N than the diesel boats

AUKUS is a lot more than just the headline grabbing sub decision, theres been a lot more subtle stuff already come and expected more over the coming months

ExAscoteer2 21st Sep 2021 20:47


Originally Posted by Yellow Sun (Post 11114615)
But the SSN has no limiting lines of submerged approach.

YS

And is damned all use in littoral waters.

ExAscoteer2 21st Sep 2021 20:49


Originally Posted by henra (Post 11114623)
SSN's can travel long distances fully submerged at high speeds and are thereby a tremendous danger to an opposing Overwater Fleet.

An SSN at speed is easy to track passively.

TWT 21st Sep 2021 20:53

Count of Monte Bisto


Again, followers of history will know that it was the Brits who were the last to sink a ship with a submarine when HMS Conqueror (UK-built nuclear submarine with conventional torpedos) sunk the Belgrano in the Falklands War.
A minor point but the ROKS vessel 'Cheonan' was sunk in 2010 by a North Korean submarine.

Video Mixdown 21st Sep 2021 21:19


Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2 (Post 11114668)
An SSN at speed is easy to track passively.

I think it's just possible that combat tactics forms part of the Commanders course.

ExAscoteer2 21st Sep 2021 21:31

I think it's just possible I have something over 1000 hrs Nimrod. Your move.

West Coast 21st Sep 2021 21:37


Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2 (Post 11114611)
SSKs are a shed load harder to detect (until they snort) and can carry the same punch.

And their time in theatre is what compared to a SSN?

ExAscoteer2 21st Sep 2021 21:43

You tell me. You are obviously an expert.

Video Mixdown 21st Sep 2021 21:54


Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2 (Post 11114685)
I think it's just possible I have something over 1000 hrs Nimrod. Your move.

My genuine respect - poorly worded. I just meant that presumably they wouldn't deliberately make it easy for you. I'm out.

ExAscoteer2 21st Sep 2021 22:05

The point is, even when they are quiet, SSNs make noise that can be tracked.

pants on fire... 21st Sep 2021 22:16

Not to suggest in any way that there is any implication of impropriety in this Australian deal, but consider the larger picture and history. It is easy to understand the outrage over this submarine deal that is now underwater, however, it is always worth considering the history of the righteous state-owned builder and some of their past deals? These implicate individuals at the highest levels of Government on both sides of the deal and have had major political and criminal implications that run for decades in some cases. The sums of money involved are staggering and there is no way they are paid without visibility at the highest levels of business and government.

https://corruption-tracker.org/case/...arine-contract
https://corruption-tracker.org/case/...bmarine-affair
https://corruption-tracker.org/case/laffaire-karachi
https://corruption-tracker.org/case/...frigate-affair

Corruption from other suppliers and countries remains a major issue in the arms business where huge amounts of money are involved, and the contemporary global compliance efforts must be wholeheartedly applauded.

West Coast 21st Sep 2021 22:59


Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2 (Post 11114697)
The point is, even when they are quiet, SSNs make noise that can be tracked.

So the perfect weapons system hasn’t been developed yet, got it.



Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2 (Post 11114690)
You tell me. You are obviously an expert.

Somehow you missed the link early in this thread that provides estimates on endurance vs range.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ubmarine-force

rjtjrt 21st Sep 2021 23:12


Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2 (Post 11114666)
And is damned all use in littoral waters.

I know you are an expert, but is the Sea of Okhotsz a littoral zone/water and didn't US operate a nuclear sub there quite successfully?

ExAscoteer2 21st Sep 2021 23:29

Oh FFS!

My point I merely pointed out that SSNs are easier to track than are SSKs, as you would know if you had ever had to do so. Get over yourselves.

Grumpy retiree 22nd Sep 2021 00:34


Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2 (Post 11114727)
Oh FFS!

My point I merely pointed out that SSNs are easier to track than are SSKs, as you would know if you had ever had to do so. Get over yourselves.

I have no personal experience of tracking subs but have talked to PC3 Orion Pilots who have and you are undoubtedly correct.
However 2 big factors in favour of nuclear subs. Range and access to the whole suite of sensor technology etc.
Range has always been a big issue for the RAN and is what probably what ruled out the German option.
Five years ago the nuclear option was not on the table. As soon as it was it was a nobrainer.

rattman 22nd Sep 2021 00:52

Didn't turball mention in memoirs that he picked the french because there was an option to change later deliveries back to nuclear subs

megan 22nd Sep 2021 01:35

Anyone like to comment. Are we in the poo, the Fat Man is also complaining about the neuclearisation.


rattman 22nd Sep 2021 02:36


Originally Posted by megan (Post 11114749)
Anyone like to comment. Are we in the poo, the Fat Man is also complaining about the neuclearisation.

No major nuclear power is going to deploy nuclear weapons, the first country to launch is the second country to die


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.