Err just noticed that Fairford still seems to be open. Shirley that would be a suitable alternative? I imagine the facepalms at Brize when they hear this news - "Goddamandbuggeration Why didn't someone think of this?!"
S'funny coz the Reds flew over my house on Sunday on their return from Silverstone. I'd automatically assumed they were running in to Brize, then just found on they'd been operating from EGVA. |
Didn't know whether to laugh or cry when I read this. Can't work out wjy an important MOD base put "out of action" by a few hot Days? Beggers belief.
Take Khartoum for example, one of the honest places on earth, they Don't have this sought of trouble with their single runway. There is always Heathrow to use I guess. Makes a "valid" military target if the military start using civil airports. |
Originally Posted by ACW342
(Post 11082473)
|
Oh yes the Herc wheels up landing :), they'd been doing circuits and bumps for a while and forgot the gear, I had the deep joy of being the Eng Ops controller on the day it happened, mind you it was a lovely landing smack down the middle and I did have the fun of using the bat phone to call OC Eng and let him know!
|
Sone of you are not taking this sticky problem seriously enough....
Jack |
Originally Posted by Stratnumberone
(Post 11082506)
If only someone had told them that putting all the AT assets into a station with only one runway could cause problems. We are all culpable for not doing so.
|
As this a a Rumour network, a few of us were led to believe that a paper written by a navigator on 101 sqn was spotted by a Bean Counter/Treasury and then put forward. Unfortunately the "idiots" refused to accept most arguments against and carried on regardless, obviously common sense ( single runway being the most obvious reason not to pursue this farcical idea ) within many officials mind's when mentioning saving money. Well said originator went far, became Air Attache at Washington in later years!
|
the RAF needs to 'relearn skills not practiced for 30 years'. |
Originally Posted by esscee
(Post 11083132)
As this a a Rumour network, a few of us were led to believe that a paper written by a navigator on 101 sqn was spotted by a Bean Counter/Treasury and then put forward. Unfortunately the "idiots" refused to accept most arguments against and carried on regardless, obviously common sense ( single runway being the most obvious reason not to pursue this farcical idea ) within many officials mind's when mentioning saving money. Well said originator went far, became Air Attache at Washington in later years!
|
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 11083156)
like strategic planning for instance...............
|
I seem to remember visiting the Vindolanda Museum on Hadrians Wall and reading a parchment by a Roman Soldier about people at the sharp end muddling through and keeping the show on the road whilst senior officers caused chaos and confusion whilst trying to climb the greasy pole.
|
Originally Posted by esscee
(Post 11083132)
As this a a Rumour network, a few of us were led to believe that a paper written by a navigator on 101 sqn was spotted by a Bean Counter/Treasury and then put forward. Unfortunately the "idiots" refused to accept most arguments against and carried on regardless, obviously common sense ( single runway being the most obvious reason not to pursue this farcical idea ) within many officials mind's when mentioning saving money. Well said originator went far, became Air Attache at Washington in later years!
|
A400 airborne from BZN a little while ago, runway serviceable or did it use the grass? !!
|
Isn't REME Lyneham a different budget, so handing it over to the Army saved RAF budgets, even though the overall cost to MoD was the same? (Or possibly more at the end of the day!)
|
The MOD (RAF) saved circa £7m pa in direct operating costs by closing Lyneham & dodging the repair bill to bring the real estate up to scratch after many years of (deliberate?) neglect.
The MOD (Army) spent circa £1b bringing the real estate up to scratch and converting it for the REME training school. Different budgets? Or just one taxpayer funded pie? Discuss... |
Originally Posted by Ken Scott
(Post 11083739)
The MOD (RAF) saved circa £7m pa in direct operating costs by closing Lyneham & dodging the repair bill to bring the real estate up to scratch after many years of (deliberate?) neglect.
The MOD (Army) spent circa £1b bringing the real estate up to scratch and converting it for the REME training school. Different budgets? Or just one taxpayer funded pie? Discuss... let’s also not forget the money the MOD have made from selling Prince Phillip Barracks in Bordon sur le Merde for the building of a new eco slum that has offset some of the money. |
Is it cancelled? Sorry, thought this was a golf thread.
|
It's hard to imagine any kind of operating risk assessment or OPEVAL for Brize Norton not starting with;
1. Runway unusable - present options. In fairness, it is a relatively new station... |
Originally Posted by DuncanDoenitz
(Post 11083842)
Is it cancelled? Sorry, thought this was a golf thread.
|
Ken,
The cost of the move (Project Hercules) was considerably south of £200M, a little adrift from your figure. Incidentally, Lyneham sits within the Defence College of Technical Training, which itself is part of the Air Top Level Budget, so infra costs still fall to Air, not Land, Command. The major savings were in the disposal of both Arborfield and Borden. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.