Originally Posted by The...Bird
(Post 10553599)
Surely because the P-8's are all new builds from scratch at the factory, won't Boeing be fitting them all with the 'Latest and greatest tech' ?
I think two of them are being sourced from used airframes |
Originally Posted by stilton
(Post 10580607)
I think two of them are being sourced from used airframes |
https://komonews.com/news/local/excl...37ng-equipment
just the bits that hold the wings on. That's all. |
Originally Posted by weemonkey
(Post 10581260)
https://komonews.com/news/local/excl...37ng-equipment
just the bits that hold the wings on. That's all. |
Bing,
"...it's hard to develop fatigue cracks in something that isn't being used." Oh I don't know, they found fatigue cracks in Valiant main spars in store that had never been used during the Valiant grounding. |
If they are saying that Max doesn't have pickle forks that's quite a change....P8 etc-military- doesn't matter until wings start coming off ???
|
Different bits, dear chap.
|
I certainly hope so, but having read the "pickle fork" thread and the revelations within, I wouldn't be quite so smug re boeing supplied product information at the moment...
|
|
Wee Monkey. Oh please. There’s no being “smug”. I quote a bare fact. If you know otherwise, please do tell. |
Originally Posted by Nige321
(Post 10587020)
|
anyone know if there's free food? |
Originally Posted by betty swallox
(Post 10587260)
Wee Monkey. Oh please. There’s no being “smug”. I quote a bare fact. If you know otherwise, please do tell. derivative of 737-800 ERX https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing...ext_Generation What is your information? |
You keep quoting the NG. The P-8 is not an NG. The centre section is completely different. If you care to do some research, available on open source, this is readily apparent. The “pickle fork” is completely different. You need to stop putting false facts on a public forum with wrong information. It’s irresponsible in my opinion, and factually wrong. I think you may be putting folks against the P-8 for no reason at all. |
Originally Posted by betty swallox
(Post 10587947)
You keep quoting the NG. The P-8 is not an NG. The centre section is completely different. If you care to do some research, available on open source, this is readily apparent. The “pickle fork” is completely different. You need to stop putting false facts on a public forum with wrong information. It’s irresponsible in my opinion, and factually wrong. I think you may be putting folks against the P-8 for no reason at all. OK. I'll take your word for it then. |
Curious to know the reason behind not installing a MAD boom ? Especially as the Indian Navy P8’s have them |
Originally Posted by stilton
(Post 10588337)
Curious to know the reason behind not installing a MAD boom ? Especially as the Indian Navy P8’s have them Furthermore the operational altitude of the aircraft means that a MAD Boom is ineffective. |
1st RAF aircraft handed over today.
|
|
Good luck Kippers, and safe flying.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.