Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
(Post 10680078)
A C-17 with a probe? That's news to me - you have a link or an image of that?
-RP |
Originally Posted by pr00ne
(Post 10679908)
cessnapete,
The RAF Nimrod MR force managed perfectly well with no AAR capability up until 1982 when it had to go a little further south. How often does a MR aircraft need to refuel in mid air? |
This is a 737-800 ish' Airframe and Engines combo. As long as the engineers don't keep pulling it apart to see if it is working' OK , should attain almost airline servicebility'.
|
Originally Posted by Lyneham Lad
(Post 10680051)
On Flight Global.
US Navy plans to arm P-8A with cruise missiles, bombs, sea mines and decoys Article intro:- Seems a rational option to want to have. NAVAIR is also interested in outfitting the maritime patrol aircraft with 500lb to 2,000lb-class bombs fitted with Joint Direct Attack Munition guidance kits, Mk62/63/65 Quickstrike sea mines, Raytheon’s gliding Small Diameter Bomb, as well as Miniature Air Launched Decoys, according to a notice posted online 28 January. |
Russian Sub activity in the Atlantic on the increase?
East Coast USA no longer a safe haven for US Ships and Subs due to new Russian capabilities? https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...o-russian-subs |
How many active Subs do the Russians have?
The last numbers I saw were 12 SSBN's - but only 3 of those are post 1985 & around 16 SSN/SSGN - only 1 of which is post 1986 & 21 SSK only one of which is a post 1981 boat They have 4 SSBN & 4 SSN on order - these are delivered spasmodically and spend a long time working up They are spread across the Atlantic and the Pacific navies Hardly a vast fleet knocking on the door TBH |
Originally Posted by cessnapete
(Post 10679776)
So the RAF Voyager cannot refuel an RAF P8? So who refuels it on a mission if required?
|
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 10680736)
How many active Subs do the Russians have?
The last numbers I saw were 12 SSBN's - but only 3 of those are post 1985 & around 16 SSN/SSGN - only 1 of which is post 1986 & 21 SSK only one of which is a post 1981 boat They have 4 SSBN & 4 SSN on order - these are delivered spasmodically and spend a long time working up They are spread across the Atlantic and the Pacific navies Hardly a vast fleet knocking on the door TBH |
Originally Posted by golder
(Post 10680769)
They would contract it out. Anyway, even if it could. You only have Voyager every other Tuesday, as it off doing private work. Your decision makers are so clever. :eek:
|
Originally Posted by Timelord
(Post 10680798)
I am no great fan of the PFI model either, but that is not quite how it works!
|
Does this 'new' Boeing machine have to be MCAS enabled ?
|
Originally Posted by Capt Kremmen
(Post 10680893)
Does this 'new' Boeing machine have to be MCAS enabled ?
|
Anglian. Thank you.
|
Great to see our MPRA capability coming back to life. Bit ironic but fitting that Kinloss welcomed it home. Best wishes CXX, I'm sure AAR is fairly low on your list of priorities!
|
I'm sure AAR is fairly low on your list of priorities! |
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
(Post 10680992)
Indeed, because they don't have it. If they had it, imagine it would be a bit further up the list.
|
Originally Posted by golder
(Post 10680846)
Aussies are clever too. We sold Omega our B707's, contracting them to refuel us.
|
Originally Posted by Rhino power
(Post 10680180)
I suspect Davef68 is referring to the fact that the RAF's E-3s have both a probe and receptacle, not that any of the C-17s had a probe...
-RP |
They would contract it out. Anyway, even if it could. You only have Voyager every other Tuesday, as it off doing private work. Your decision makers are so clever. https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif |
Originally Posted by aw ditor
(Post 10680428)
This is a 737-800 ish' Airframe and Engines combo. As long as the engineers don't keep pulling it apart to see if it is working' OK , should attain almost airline servicebility'.
Of course this is all moot if there is never a requirement for long-term remaining on station, so hopefully we will be OK or at least be in a situation where the Yanks could assist. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:45. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.