PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   North Korea! (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/593633-north-korea.html)

onion 15th Sep 2017 22:34

UN=League of Nations

West Coast 16th Sep 2017 01:10


China invades from the north and west
unless your belief is a couple of border guards with sidearms will stealthily remove the fat wun, do you believe the Norks won't somehow notice the build up of forces on their border? You think the Norks haven't noticed the degrading relationship with the Chinese? The Chinese have been on the receiving end of NK propaganda, so they are willing to bite the hand that feeds them.

Knowing that your idea would require a significant build up of forces to assure success, which would attract attention, do you think the fat wun wouldn't unleash his nuclear fury on the Chinese if he believed they were intent on unseating him? What's to stop him?

A_Van 16th Sep 2017 05:52

Lord Riot,


Such an operation only makes sense when there is (yet in a dark shadow) a prepared and well-controlled opposition group with appropriate leader that would quicky take and hold the power. This is to avoid chaos. Otherwise, one bad fat Un would be replaced by even worse one. Looks like such an alternative is not yet ready. And anyway, it is only China who can raise such figures, not US, Russia, Europe, to say nothing about Japan and SK who are hatred by definition in NK.

Fareastdriver 16th Sep 2017 06:48


do you believe the Norks won't somehow notice the build up of forces on their border?
The Allied forces didn't notice it in October 1950.

The Chinese already have substantial forces in that part of China. Historically because of Korea but also confronting Russia when they weren't pals.

Heathrow Harry 16th Sep 2017 08:42

"one bad fat Un would be replaced by even worse one"

Thats a frightenign thought - that the Young Leader isn't the worst of the pack..................

ORAC 16th Sep 2017 09:30

The usual result in such circumstances is chaos - as in Iraq, Libya or Rumania. Dictators have a strong habit and incentive in eliminating anyone with the ability or character to be a suitable replacement and promoting yes men instead.

Heathrow Harry 16th Sep 2017 11:57

Romania didn't decline into chaos - it had a relatively simple trip form Dictatorship to a communist/socialist/ military Govt and eventually became a (sort-of) democracy albeit with high levels of corruption

In fact the beloved Leader and his Mrs were shot BECAUSE the other power groups wanted their mouths firmly closed ................

unmanned_droid 16th Sep 2017 18:55

I'm still not sure that Kim isn't just a puppet for the generals and/or committees

West Coast 16th Sep 2017 20:01

Fareastdriver.

This isn't 1950, surveillance capabilities are a wee bit better. Not exactly sure why you'd even attempt to make a comparison. All they'd have to do is monitor western 24 hr cable channels

And yes, Chinese forces were known to the UN prior to entering NK. The Chinese telegraphed the move.

DirtyProp 18th Sep 2017 10:28

US Flies Stealth Fighters, Bombers Over Korean Peninsula For Drill: Seoul

And

US: N Korea to be 'destroyed' if behaviour continues
UN Ambassador Haley warns Pyongyang 'a whole lot of military options' are being considered to defend US and allies.
US: N Korea to be 'destroyed' if behaviour continues | USA News | Al Jazeera

Will the lardy lunatic back down? I doubt it.

Thomas coupling 18th Sep 2017 11:37

How many rockets has the Phat Wun launched since puberty?
How much does each cost?
Where does all this money come from as they don't sell anything?
Has he got any money/rockets left?
Why hasn't anyone 'flannelled' him with some toxic chemical FFS?

SARF 18th Sep 2017 21:09

https://goo.gl/images/JloLjd
Knock off everything except defence and bob's your uncle

KenV 19th Sep 2017 16:02


Originally Posted by Fareastdriver (Post 9893334)
The Allied forces didn't notice it in October 1950.

Ummmm, no. The Chinese build up of forces was well observed and well known. The powers that be just assumed the Chinese would never actually attack because it was assumed such an attack was certain to trigger a nuclear response from the US. Nine bombs complete with nuclear cores and nuclear capable delivery B-29 bombers were forward deployed to Okinawa. But the Chinese figured the US was bluffing and attacked. The Chinese were right. No nukes ever made it into the Korean theater.

It was probably just as well, because over a 160 kilotons of conventional bombs had been dropped on North Korea. There were very few significant targets left.

KenV 19th Sep 2017 16:07


Originally Posted by Thomas coupling (Post 9895462)
How many rockets has the Phat Wun launched since puberty?
How much does each cost?
Where does all this money come from as they don't sell anything?
Has he got any money/rockets left?
Why hasn't anyone 'flannelled' him with some toxic chemical FFS?

Ummm, no. North Korea exports lots and lots of coal as well as other minerals. Mostly to China. They also export technology. Iran has reportedly paid huge bucks for North Korean nuclear and rocket technology.

chopper2004 19th Sep 2017 16:36

It gets better :E:E

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-even-for-him/

Lonewolf_50 19th Sep 2017 17:25

I do not care for Mr Trump's rhetorical style. I prefer TR's "walk softly and carry a big stick." I see a bit too much trash talk, and a bit too much "reality TV" to be happy with style.
The fact is, yeah, if a can of whoopass is to be opened, it's rather bad to be on the wrong side of it.
Without Russian and Chinese support, however, since we live in a multi power, multi polar world, there are some side effects to whoopass cans being opened that I hope Mr Trump is aware of.

DirtyProp 19th Sep 2017 17:27


Ummm, no. North Korea exports lots and lots of coal as well as other minerals. Mostly to China. They also export technology. Iran has reportedly paid huge bucks for North Korean nuclear and rocket technology.
And let's not forget massive, ginormous statues loved by somewhat democratic leaders:

North Korea's 'biggest' export - giant statues - BBC News

The lardy Kim isn't budging yet:

North Korea says sanctions will accelerate nuclear programme - BBC News

KenV 20th Sep 2017 15:18


Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50 (Post 9897139)
I do not care for Mr Trump's rhetorical style. I prefer TR's "walk softly and carry a big stick."

Me too.

Sadly, over a half century of experience shows that that style does not work for the North Koreans. It goes right over their head. Let's see if "trash talk" along with some very obvious military shows of force is more effective. I suspect not, but it's worth a try. But if this is not effective, the alternative is downright grim.

Treble one 21st Sep 2017 10:53

I'm hoping the the people who are really in charge of the US Military (ie the Generals) are advising the President that a pre-emptive strike would probably not be the best action in the circumstances.


I'm also hoping that they are advising that in the event of NK lobbing something in the general direction of Guam, then any retaliatory action should be proportionate.


Its a tad worrying when 'General Ripper' is the C in C rather than the 'mad general'.

tdracer 21st Sep 2017 19:27


I'm also hoping that they are advising that in the event of NK lobbing something in the general direction of Guam, then any retaliatory action should be proportionate.
Actually, I'm hoping that the cronies surrounding the young Phat Un are warning him the response could be anything but "proportionate" - if NK detonates a nuke anywhere outside of NK, expect NK to cease to exist.
I really think that's the only thing young Phat Un understands...


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.