PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   SDSR 15 (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/553650-sdsr-15-a.html)

pr00ne 8th May 2015 10:54

Bannock,

With the Nasty party in total control I think you can look forward to eye watering defence cuts for the next five years.

downsizer 8th May 2015 12:20

I am willing to take redundancy if that helps! :)

Melchett01 8th May 2015 16:48

I don't think "the Nasty Party" will have anything to do with impending cuts. As High Spirits notes, defence would be in the firing line whichever party won last night. Although I wouldn't be surprised if the US didn't lean on the MoD / PM to temper any further cuts.

And personally, I don't think not spending money you don't have qualifies you as "nasty", just sensible, but I suppose that's the northern working class common sense in me talking. Any one who thinks otherwise needs to wake up to the chaos spending what you don't have causes.

glad rag 8th May 2015 18:58


Originally Posted by Sandy Parts (Post 8961682)
Glad rag - my (limited) interaction with the Tonka fleet (Lossie division) would not support your main argument. Yes, they may be owned by MoD and first line maintained by the finest RAF techies fuelled on enthusiasm and pies (:p) BUT the big jobs (depth) are all done by contractors so incur direct costs at contract renewal time (pay for x years even if you only keep the frame going for X-2?). To adapt the mighty warbird means major interaction with design authority (added cost) and even that doesn't always deliver the goods (TCAS fit anyone?).
In the complex, 'shave that cost off to contractors - someone else's budget' world of modern govt accounting - nothing matters except hitting your targets and the govt prioritises FINANCIAL targets over real targets.
Still, maybe we are all wrong and SDSR won't be another cost-cutting exercise like the last one was (as even the govt now admits)....

No disrespect intended but
"and first line maintained by the finest RAF techies fuelled on enthusiasm and pies"

Hmm, from what I've seen recently ;) I don't think so.

And yes, Sadly it's all about £

Now, how they disguise that £, well....

rgds to the front line

gr

glad rag 8th May 2015 19:02


Originally Posted by Melchett01 (Post 8970054)
I don't think "the Nasty Party" will have anything to do with impending cuts. As High Spirits notes, defence would be in the firing line whichever party won last night. Although I wouldn't be surprised if the US didn't lean on the MoD / PM to temper any further cuts.

And personally, I don't think not spending money you don't have qualifies you as "nasty", just sensible, but I suppose that's the northern working class common sense in me talking. Any one who thinks otherwise needs to wake up to the chaos spending what you don't have causes.

And all of a sudden Vlad is telling Liz how many sugars in his tea. Oh and by the way... :mad:

Bannock 9th May 2015 12:27

BBC reporting that any Bombshells our new Gov want to drop may come PDQ to capitalise on the Opposition parties lack of leadership and complete confusion.

Foreign Sec, Chancellor and Def sec back at desks on Monday.
Brace Brace Brace.


Spending And Review Top Tory Defense Priorities

GeeRam 9th May 2015 13:19

I see Vlad has just put on quite an impressive 'old style' parade for their 70th anniversary VE day commemorations......

LowObservable 9th May 2015 14:29

As a pilot from the Danish Air Force told me when asked about cuts in Denmark: 'You can't pluck hair from the head of a bald man'.

Sounds like a great idea for the Danes to buy the world's most expensive fighter, then.

Bigbux 9th May 2015 16:13


Originally Posted by Bannock (Post 8970891)
BBC reporting that any Bombshells our new Gov want to drop may come PDQ to capitalise on the Opposition parties lack of leadership and complete confusion.

Foreign Sec, Chancellor and Def sec back at desks on Monday.
Brace Brace Brace.


Spending And Review Top Tory Defense Priorities

So absolutely no risk of them suddenly deciding to pay double for the Army's Apache replacement by allowing Westlands to get in on the act, rather than sourcing from Boeing direct then.

glad rag 9th May 2015 16:55


Originally Posted by Bigbux (Post 8971095)
So absolutely no risk of them suddenly deciding to pay double for the Army's Apache replacement by allowing Westlands to get in on the act, rather than sourcing from Boeing direct then.

I have a deep and desperate need to understand WHY the Army actually needs "new" apaches anyway.

Melchett01 9th May 2015 17:20

SDSR 15
 
I think the best we can hope for is an SDSR that is a progress check towards FF2020. Any radical changes would risk undoing all the work already done and nullify previous assumptions.

And I would hope even the most doctrinal of staff officers would argue that would be a huge waste of effort.

Jayand 9th May 2015 17:26

Glad rag, would you care to quantify your sweeping generalisation about Finest RAF techies?
And you could very well argue that Putins display of hardware yesterday at VE day celebrations would be a decent reason for keeping a modern, updated battlefield helicopter. No?

Guernsey Girl II 9th May 2015 17:52

Jaylad,

I don't know where abouts in the real world you are, but the Victory Parade in Red Square started at 07:00z today (9 May). Perhaps you saw pics of one of the many practices (they have enough rehearsals to make GSM London District green with envy). You could see it live on any TV in the UK on Russia Today. I wonder how much that costs good old Vladimir? (TV station I mean, I'm sure the parade was peanuts):ok:

Selatar 10th May 2015 08:13

Melchett,

That would be nice to have a mere tweak of the tiller. I don't think the treasury will permit such activity however. Even without No11 interference difficult decisions needed with flat cash, even with 1% for procurement.

SDSR announcement early in the week is my guess. To report in six months for immediate implementation.

Bastardeux 11th May 2015 10:59

Interesting development?...

Tory backbenchers threaten to block David Cameron's defence cuts ahead of meeting - Telegraph

Wyler 11th May 2015 11:49

Whilst we still have horses towing guns I doubt Joe Public, on a zero hours contract, will believe the Military is 'cut to the bone'.

Sandy Parts 11th May 2015 12:26

Jayand - perhaps Glad Rag was referring to my 'pies' comment? I admit, since the days of the NAAFI wagon are long gone and popping to the new 'joint' scoff hall means risking running into all sorts of bosses - maybe the pie intake is reduced? :ok:

Bannock 12th May 2015 15:30

Anna Soubry and Rory Stewart, some of the most vocal and well informed MPs on the Defence Select commitee I see have been moved on.
I am not suggesting anything!
But someone else is

http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2015/0...ect-committee/

Willard Whyte 20th May 2015 19:07

Not unexpected...


The chancellor disclosed that Greg Hands, the new chief secretary, has written to every government department except health, education and international development ordering them to find cuts.

It comes as the government faces a potential back-bench rebellion unless it commits to spending 2 per cent of Britain's national income on defence.
Make the most of your 1% pay rise chaps & chapesses, can't see many further rises for a while.

Bannock 20th May 2015 19:50

The SOS was at High Wycombe on the 15th and addressed the great unwashed about SDSR.
Did he drop any clues about when he was going to spill the beans ?


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:03.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.