PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Sgt Nightingale (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/501633-sgt-nightingale.html)

Lightning Mate 29th Nov 2012 16:11

Sgt Nightingale
 
He's been freed. :D:D:D:D

Airborne Aircrew 29th Nov 2012 16:18

Should never have been in in the first place...

Lightning Mate 29th Nov 2012 16:46

Absolutely!

Would anyone want to enrol in the UK Forces now?

I certainly would not - I persuaded my son not to do so.

It seems the only people who appreciate our soldiers are the general public.

Cameron and every other politician have absolutely no idea.

DO YOU HEAR ME GOVERNMENT W:mad:ers???

edit:


Three judges - Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, Mr Justice Fulford and Mr Justice
Bean - heard legal argument at a hearing in the Court Martial Appeal Court in
London.
I am an ex-military officer - those "officers" responsible for this are pretenders!

500N 29th Nov 2012 16:57

:D:D:D:D

Good to hear :ok:


It should never have got to this stage in the first place,
any issue handled "in house" and dealt with then it
would have been accepted by all.

Geehovah 29th Nov 2012 17:13

Brilliant news!:D:D:D

I remember rule No 1 of command was discipline your subordinate quickly as no one could be punished twice for the same offence.

Saintsman 29th Nov 2012 17:24

Lets hope others learn from this and if they have any weapons or ammunition at home they may have collected, they get rid of it or take appropriate steps to hold them legally.

Trim Stab 29th Nov 2012 17:28

I disagree profoundly with all the above posters.

He knew the rules, wilfully broke them, and has used the reputation of the Reg to manipulate the media in order to get early release from what was already a very lenient sentence. He should have kept his mouth shut, accepted he had f*Ckd up, and done his time.

I saw also he went on TV and made a speech (without even black masking tape over his eyes). It looked to me that this was to fish for a book contract. Good luck to him, but he'll be PNGd for life.

Tiger_mate 29th Nov 2012 17:32


but he'll be PNGd for life.
All the best people are :E apparently :rolleyes:

Good outcome to an embarrassing situation.

goudie 29th Nov 2012 17:37

Good to see the right decision finally made. :ok:

Courtney Mil 29th Nov 2012 17:41

I'm still not sure how someone getting off free for committing a crime is the right outcome. Please explain.

Airborne Aircrew 29th Nov 2012 17:52

Because the law is an asinine law... :hmm:

airborne_artist 29th Nov 2012 17:53

The guy had a weapon in contravention of the Firearms Act.

The guy had AP rounds in contravention of the Firearms Act.

The guy had made declarations about having no live rounds in his possession.

Five years minimum, eight would have been reasonable.

Precendence has now been set, which will come back and bite when we least expect it.

Canadian Break 29th Nov 2012 17:57

I'm with you Courters - now how do we stand with Precedent? Both with this case and the female labour MP who was not charged because of ill health? As the thread developed I found myself jumping off the outrage bus and thinking that the CM system had done its best for this bloke - no reduction to the ranks, no discharge etc.

Courtney Mil 29th Nov 2012 17:59


Because the law is an asinine law
That's a totally different argument. None of us can choose to ignore a law just because we don't like it or it interferes with our desire to collect trophies. You're half right, it IS a law. And he knowingly broke it.

The next gang member caught with an illegal firearm could make the same appeal, I guess. That would be good! :ugh:

sitigeltfel 29th Nov 2012 18:11

Anyone who has served in the UK armed forces should have this statement branded into their brain...

"I have no live ammunition or empty cases in my possession"

'nuff said :=

BOAC 29th Nov 2012 18:18


I'm still not sure how someone getting off free for committing a crime is the right outcome.
- legally he has not. His sentence was reduced and then suspended. It is still a sentence - which will not go away from his records.

The whole saga is convoluted, with confusing sidelines of mental disturbance and personally I feel this is an acceptable solution.

barnstormer1968 29th Nov 2012 18:30

Anyone who has served in the UK armed forces should have this statement branded into their brain...

"I have no live ammunition or empty cases in my possession"

'nuff said :=


I'm confused now. I served in the UK armed forces, but never said that statement, and it is not branded into my brain.

I did however say: "I have no live rounds, misfires or empty cases in my possession"

I also said: "I have no rockets in my pockets, wombats in my combats or shermulies round my goulies"

Maybe brain branding isn't what it used to be :E

FODPlod 29th Nov 2012 18:35

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. SF are supposed to be selected for brains as well as brawn.

dctyke 29th Nov 2012 18:36

With trim stab on this one, this was one of the rules everyone in the mil was clear about. Strange how the media never talk about when, where and how he got hold of the ammunition.

A very lucky guy who will most probably make a mint out of this!

P6 Driver 29th Nov 2012 18:38

I have no particular views on the Nightingale case as I haven't read up on all the known "facts", but thank goodness he wasn't some mad nutter who chose to use an unlawfully held weapon and ammunition on some rampage.

The next time a Hungerford/Dunblane occurs, if it's done by an ex-HM Forces chap, presumably some would think that it's just high spirits.

Trim Stab 29th Nov 2012 18:39

BOAC - you are correct that this is a convoluted case with many strands - the CM did a very good job in taking all of those into account and delivering a very fair verdict.

What is totally reprehensible is that Nightingale has used the reputation of the Regiment to his own ends in order to manipulate the media and even the PM in order to have his already lenient sentence reduced. He is trading for his own selfish ends a regimental reputation which has been built by many top blokes who have sacrificed far more than he has. If he has any sense at all, he will now go away quietly. But I suspect that he won't and that this is not the end of this story.

I sympathised with the rather excellent Secretary for Defence having to defend on TV the appalling populist ploy of "call me Dave" and at the same time assuage some senior brass who must be absolutely livid at this trial by media.

Lima Juliet 29th Nov 2012 18:40

I also think this sets a dangerous precedent. I now expect the next scroat who gets nicked with a Glock and AP in his possesion to be given a suspended sentence when his top-notch lawyer quotes Nightingale vs The Crown, 2012.

At least he did some 'time' and he probably won't do it again...

LJ:cool:

lj101 29th Nov 2012 18:49

Trim etc have you seen this;


20 Nov 2012 : Column 554

During the search, the police uncovered the weapon belonging to Danny Nightingale, which was still in its container in a cupboard and a quantity of ammunition under his bed. I understand that the unit held an immediate weapons amnesty and that an embarrassingly large number of weapons turned up in the skip that was conveniently provided overnight.

Most parts of the Army have been engaged in dangerous and often bloody operations. Where special forces are different from the rest of the Army is that they do not leave that regime on coming back to the UK. Typically, as was the case with Sergeant Nightingale, they remain on very short notice to move for long periods, which entails keeping live ammunition in their kit. They are, of course, subject to the same law and the same internal rules as other parts of the Army, but the pressure and temptation on tired, overstretched men to take weapons and kit containing live rounds back to their accommodation is of a different order of magnitude. It is clear from the article by Sergeant Nightingale’s gallant former commanding officer, Colonel Richard Williams MBE MC, that the amnesty revealed that a number of people in the regiment had got into bad habits under the extreme pressure of operational tours abroad and the high-readiness cycle at home.
It seems there was a habit of messy 'admin' , so do they charge them all?

Source

House of Commons Hansard Debates for 20 Nov 2012 (pt 0004)

500N 29th Nov 2012 18:55

The admin would have been interesting to bring all those "weapons"
onto charge for the unit.

NutLoose 29th Nov 2012 19:02

Good result.

I remember in NI getting lumbered with a damn block inspection just after I arrived, opening the top locker that was so high no one used it I found some live SLR rounds... Eek :eek: thinking what the hell do I do with these, if I chuck em out the window and they're found the sh*t will hit the proverbial, bin was out of the question, so sheepishly took them to the armoury, banged on the hatch, tells him I found these, cool we are always short of them, thanks and relieves me off them.... Glad to see the back of them :)

Trim Stab 29th Nov 2012 19:04


revealed that a number of people in the regiment had got into bad habits
There has evidently been a very serious erosion of standards, not only of personal discipline of SF soldiers but also of regimental control. It will be damaging in the long term.

Fox3WheresMyBanana 29th Nov 2012 19:48

This is the Appeals system at work, I think.

Given the facts, the CM gave as lenient a sentence as they could. The message to the Armed Forces from a suspended sentence would have been wrong.

They left the door open in the President's summing up, "Parliament has decreed".

And Parliament,in its wisdom, has now, via LCJ, re-decreed.

Message to average squaddie is still imprisonment from a CM for keeping arms/ammo. Message from general public is "If you are in an elite unit and on constant call and brain-damaged and this is the first time you've f#cked up..and..and...and, then you get forgiven...once.

We have a jury system in civil courts. I recall the case of a father up for grevious wounding, etc, who had taken a shotgun to the one-eyed truck driver who, driving illegally, had run down and killed his daughter. 55 zillion witnesses; verdict: Not Guilty.

There are always exceptions.


.

The Old Fat One 29th Nov 2012 20:02


Some of the anti gun rubbish on this thread is unreal. This silly island has some of the most restrictive, primitive and unfair anti gun legislation anywhere. We are simply talking about a handgun!!!! I bet our American cousins think this place is insane.
Well, a little distraction from the main rights and wrongs of this thread.

Thanks RR, that's possibly the funniest thing I've ever read on pprune.

I bet you don't like Mondays either...tell me why

david parry 29th Nov 2012 20:48

Go Danny Go!!!! Drinks are on me in CW2 Sally:D https://news.google.co.uk/news/story...ed=0CDIQqgIwAA

Pontius Navigator 29th Nov 2012 21:14


Originally Posted by Ronald Reagan (Post 7547258)
I bet our American cousins think this place is insane.

Saw a video tonight which included a shot in a bedroom. Next to the dressing table was a glass fronted cabinet with perhaps 5 rifles or shot guns in the rack!

500N 29th Nov 2012 21:20

If it was legal here I'd have them on display as well !

fantom 29th Nov 2012 21:24

OK, a very good man is home for Christmas. Is that good or not?

Answers on a postcard.

orca 29th Nov 2012 21:39

I tried my hardest not to post, but anyway:

The police searched the accommodation of two SF blokes (one targeted the other simply at this point a co-habitee) and both were found to have some form of illegal weaponry. Quite a lot actually.

There is now anecdotal evidence to suggest that a number of their colleagues had similar items that were given in under an amnesty.

I think it is hard in this situation to explain all this away as a function of the stress, strain and scheduling of their work. A small part of me suspects that a significant number of this unit were simply 'taking the piss'.

cuefaye 29th Nov 2012 21:43


The next gang member caught with an illegal firearm could make the same
appeal, I guess. That would be good!
What a shameful comment Courtney Mil. I commented upon your earlier post elsewhere in a related thread where you suggested that many of those on here weren't familiar with all the facts: you chose not to respond. The chap was technically in the wrong, and has been awarded an appropriate military punishment; and happily, he will be at home for Christmas. For you, given your background, to use the term 'gang member' as a comparator is quite appalling. I hope you will retract.

Stuff 29th Nov 2012 22:02

Oh dear. Have we got to the stage of deliberately misinterpreting posts in order to jump on the outrage bus now?

Hueymeister 29th Nov 2012 22:02

So, will he continue to serve? Busted in rank? Or is he out on his ear?

Sand4Gold 29th Nov 2012 22:16


technically in the wrong
You read the CM transcript and came to the conclusion that he was 'technically in the wrong' - seriously?

S4G

AtomKraft 29th Nov 2012 22:24

A chum of mine bought a house three years ago.

During the couurse of 'doing it up' he found a Luger pistol secreted under the water tank in the loft. Preseved very nicely.

He rang me about it (as I'm ex Army).

What do you think he did, and what do you think happened?

glad rag 29th Nov 2012 23:18

If he plead guilty during the trial how can he suddenly become innocent?

<devils advocate on>

Guilty as sin, with perhaps a very good medical alibi, but if his memory functions have been that severely affected then why is he still "on the job"?

Something doesn't actually ADD up here.

<devils advocate off>

Still, I'm glad he's out, one half of me deplores some of the comments on here, none of us are ABOVE the law.

The other half is smiling quietly to itself.:ok:

parabellum 30th Nov 2012 04:07



If he plead guilty during the trial how can he suddenly become
innocent?
He hasn't. Still guilty as charged but his custodial sentence was reduced and suspended, enabling him to be immediately released.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.