PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   15 ton "Big blu" (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/470053-15-ton-big-blu.html)

500N 30th Nov 2011 10:02

SAMXXV

Ack

£50 is fine by me.

We are still working to the same timetable of "say Mid December" ?
Since you are in the UK, let's make it by exactly 2359 hrs Z 15 Dec 2011
that was it doesn't matter where in the world it happens, we are all working
on the same time.

My charity will be decided if I lose and chosen as per my previous post.

Yes, things have progressed along a fair bit. We will see.

I have no contacts anywhere in the UK and certainly not in the MOD / FO.
Re Brown Jobs / Green Jobs, Army and my beret was always green to me.

500N 30th Nov 2011 10:29

SAM
Stop changing the date.

See your post 52 on the preceding page.

I quote
"I now bring my bet of a severe air strike on Iran to mid December.http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...ilies/cool.gif"

.
Well done to your son. He'll soon know if he is good enough, hope he is. I very nearly joined the Paras in '81 but came to Aust instead. In some ways still wished I had joined them.

ORAC 30th Nov 2011 10:43


As to today's blast ... which occurred but then didn't occur ... who knows?
Looks like attacks, by one means or another, are already in progress...

A second Iranian nuclear facility has exploded, as diplomatic tensions rise between the West and Tehran


AN IRANIAN nuclear facility has been hit by a huge explosion, the second such blast in a month, prompting speculation that Tehran's military and atomic sites are under attack.

Satellite imagery seen by The Times confirmed that a blast that rocked the city of Isfahan on Monday struck the uranium enrichment facility there, despite denials by Tehran. The images clearly showed billowing smoke and destruction, negating Iranian claims yesterday that no such explosion had taken place. Israeli intelligence officials told The Times that there was "no doubt" that the blast struck the nuclear facilities at Isfahan and that it was "no accident".

The explosion at Iran's third-largest city came as satellite images emerged of the damage caused by one at a military base outside Tehran two weeks ago that killed about 30 members of the Revolutionary Guard, including General Hassan Moghaddam, the head of the Iranian missile defence program. Iran claimed that the Tehran explosion occurred during testing on a new weapons system designed to strike at Israel. But several Israeli officials have confirmed that the blast was intentional and part of an effort to target Iran's nuclear weapons program.

On Monday, Isfahan residents reported a blast that shook tower blocks in the city at about 2.40pm and seeing a cloud of smoke rising over the nuclear facility on the edge of the city. "This caused damage to the facilities in Isfahan, particularly to the elements we believe were involved in storage of raw materials," said one military intelligence source. He would not confirm or deny Israel's involvement in the blast, instead saying that there were "many different parties looking to sabotage, stop or coerce Iran into stopping its nuclear weapons program".

Iran went into frantic denial yesterday as news of the explosion at Isfahan emerged. Alireza Zaker-Isfahani, the city's governor, claimed that the blast had been caused by a military exercise in the area but state-owned agencies in Tehran soon removed this story and issued a government denial that any explosion had taken place at all.

On Monday, Dan Meridor. the Israeli Intelligence Minister, said: "There are countries who impose economic sanctions and there are countries who act in other ways in dealing with the Iranian nuclear threat."

Major-General Giora Eiland, Israel's former director of national security, told Israel's army radio that the Isfahan blast was no accident. "There aren't many coincidences, and when there are so many events there is probably some sort of guiding hand, though perhaps it's the hand of God," he said.

A former Israeli intelligence official cited at least two other explosions that have "successfully neutralised" Iranian bases associated with the Shahab-3, the medium-range missile that could be adapted to carry a nuclear warhead. "This is something everyone in the West wanted to see happen," he added..............

500N 30th Nov 2011 10:50

SAM

My understanding of " is that an attack on Iran will occur" is that the Israelis and the US will DROP bombs on Iran / Iranian facilities FROM Military aircraft.

Do you want to include Missiles (ie Cruise type) in the list as well ?

Your thoughts ?

.

Mach Two 30th Nov 2011 14:48

I'm not sure that answered 500N's question, Sam.

HTB 30th Nov 2011 15:10

Some sinister force must be censoring Radio 4; there ain't much mention of all this iminent doom on the Today, World at One or PM programmes (nor the regular news bulletins).

By the way, how do you know where the UK and US have deployed their SSBN assets?

Mister B

TEEEJ 30th Nov 2011 15:18

SAMXXV wrote


... see the CIA TR1 (overflying Iran) Elint today.
A bit behind the times there, Sam. The TR-1 designation went nearly 20 years ago.


The last U-2 and TR-1 aircraft were delivered to the Air Force in October 1989. In 1992 all TR-1s and U-2s were redesignated U-2R.
From

SENIOR YEAR U-2 / TR-1

The military operated U-2Rs underwent an upgrade including a new engine. After upgrading with the F-118-101 engine, the former U-2Rs were designated the U-2S.

As to 'CIA operated U-2s' over Iran. The USAF operate the U-2S and NASA operate the ER-2s. The U-2 is a highly vulnerable platform for a direct overflight. It certainly wouldn't be overflying Iran. Peripheral collection using slant sensors from International or friendly airspace is what would be taking place. If anything was assigned to operate over Iran in an intelligence collection role it certainly wouldn't be a manned platform.

The Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel has for example been photographed operating from Afghan bases.

New Photos of USAF RQ-170 Sentinel released | Defence Aviation

UAVs Dominate Surveillance And Targeting | AVIATION WEEK

Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lonewolf_50 30th Nov 2011 15:30

TEEJ/SAM/ORAC

1. If the Israelis are involved in these two explosions, that indicates to me no need whatsoever for the IAF to fly over Iran and drop bombs. It would seem that another means has been figured out. But I am not sure what to make of the cryptic comments from the Israelis, as information warfare and deception are becoming more frequently and subtly used by a lot of different parties. (See the Pakistan/US mess currently underway along the Pak?Afghan border).

2. U2 over flights, Iran. No. I can say that with some operational experience, having worked on some stuff a few years back that included a whole variety of surveillance packages in that part of the world. No further comment.

3. UAV's: heh, part of the reason to use some of those assets is that they are very, very hard to detect. Who knows what assets are being used to keep any eye on Iran's nuclear sites?

4. Don't forget various satellites.

Cheers.

500N 30th Nov 2011 15:39

Interesting developments (yes, I know it is from the Telegraph!!!)
• William Hague orders closure of Iran embassy in London
• All Iranian officials ordered to leave within the next 48 hours
• Britain withdraws diplomatic staff from Iran after embassy attacks
• Norway closes its Tehran embassy citing security concerns
• David Cameron says Britain considering 'very tough action'

You never know SAM, you might be in with a chance !!! LOL

SAM
Re your quote "Israel requires permission", that is funny. sorry, but israel does not ask permission of Syria if they are going to over fly to bomb someone. They might ask the US re Iraq airspace but not others if they don't have to.
Another "Green Leader" moment ?????? LOL


Re your quote "Israel just cannot stand back & accept the threats of being wiped off the planet by Iran. Would you?"
I would have thought you would have worked out by now that I don't back down from a fight / challenge so No, I would not accept it.


Lonewolf
I agree re UAV'S / Satellites.

To be honest, I am amazed at what info is out and publicly available on the internet or has become public since the US invaded Afghanistan.

500N 30th Nov 2011 15:46

SAM
I am trying to be black and white here re the bet so no ambiguity occurs but you are NOT answering the question re the time.

I have reproduced my post below

"Stop changing the date.
See your post 52 on the preceding page.
I quote
"I now bring my bet of a severe air strike on Iran to mid December.http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...ilies/cool.gif"


So SAM, you changed the original bet to mid December and that is why I am working on Mid December, as specified by my ZULU time / date designation.
Stop trying to give yourself extra time.



Anyone else care to chime in re what they think the date deadline of the bet should be ? The SAME as SAM's original bet ?

Tourist 30th Nov 2011 16:00

I really don't think it will make any difference.....

500N 30th Nov 2011 16:11

"I really don't think it will make any difference....."

I am happy to pay up if proved wrong but SAM opened his big mouth and I am not going to let him wriggle out of it by extending the date to give him a few extra days.

Especially since he (SAM) keeps chopping and changing on everything else in this thread, especially or even when others who seem / are far more knowledgeable post facts that are the opposite to what he has posted.

He made his bed, now he can sleep in it.

Well at least if I win, you win which means SAM won't be around any more to post ?????

Tourist 30th Nov 2011 17:25

amen brother.....

Mach Two 30th Nov 2011 17:52

That's what I meant, SAM. You didn't answer 500N's question. In fact, I think you need to address all his points. My take, for what it's worth, is that your bet is:

Big Blu dropped on Iranian nuclear sites by Is/US by 15th December.

Here's another thought for you. Will Israel really risk being caught taking such agressive action when they know that they are surrounded by Arab nations who are looking for an excuse to jump over their garden fence and try to beat the crap out of them?

READ WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING AND ADDRESS THE POINTS rather than keep spouting different positions every day and conveniently ignoring what's been said to you.

Are you sure that APG63's first point isn't closer to the truth? Or is this attention seeking?

Oh, and you don't need to keep quoting entire posts. Be concise.

M2

APG63 30th Nov 2011 18:06

500N, I support your position, but he (SAM) did change it to "mid-December".

Mach Two, well said.

One thing, though. I've been looking through SAM's other posts at some length (out of interest as to where he's coming from) and I have had to rethink my point 1. I don't think this is a wind-up. He's like this in every thread. Off the plot, out of date, random and with some very strange an irrelevant extras - the guy that befriended him, his son, his post as Op O in Laarbruch, etc. All a bit strange. No, it's not a wind-up, it's something else.

Tourist, hear, hear.

Lone Wolf, wise words.

Still a cracking thread.

500N 30th Nov 2011 18:15

I'd like to run a Psych profile on SAM, I think it would be very interesting case study.:O

However that might ruin his RAF career - if he is in the RAF !


SAM
Enough other posters are in agreement without any disagreeing so it's Mid December and I'll re post it just to be sure you understand.

"let's make it by exactly 2359 hrs Z 15 Dec 2011"


Now that is settled, I'm off the bet subject until the 15th (unless all out war starts before then :O)


Let's get this thread back on the interesting discussions and SAM's rantings and ravings on US / Israeli policy and tactics.
.

Willard Whyte 30th Nov 2011 18:29

I would describe mid-December as sometime between about the 10th and about the 21st.

Ish.

Maybe he's got the year wrong and is thinking of Dec 21st 2012?

2012 phenomenon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

500N 30th Nov 2011 18:36

Willard

Don't you start :O



Back on topic

These "explosions" that have been occurring - and remember that a General was killed which to me seemed a bit strange.

What are people's thoughts ?
- Internal factions within Iran getting rid of opponents ?
- US / Israeli involvement ?
- Sabotage from / by whoever, US / Israeli or even internal ?
- Messy safety procedures and / or trying to do some things too fast
and cutting corners, causing fatal safety mistakes which in turn leads
to a chain reaction just like Aircraft crashes, no one cause ?

Mach Two 30th Nov 2011 18:38

Willard, how on earth did you happen across that? Fascinating, but scary that you knew it was there! :ok:

Mach Two 30th Nov 2011 18:39

500N. Dunno. Lots of those are possible. Don't worry about it. I'm sure SAM will know!


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:22.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.