PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   29 Sqn "Phantom" & 392nd ODRAP "Bear" over South Atlantic 1982 (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/464904-29-sqn-phantom-392nd-odrap-bear-over-south-atlantic-1982-a.html)

Marcantilan 28th Sep 2011 13:47

29 Sqn "Phantom" & 392nd ODRAP "Bear" over South Atlantic 1982
 
Two sides of the story.

On July 11, 1982, Colonel Georgy Bul'bénkov (Soviet Navy, Naval Aviation) was ordered to fly his Tu-95 Bear "D" belonging to the 392 ODRAP from Angola to a certain point in the middle of the Atlantic, near Ascension Island.

His mission was to check any battle damage to carrier HMS Hermes, returning home from the South Atlantic War.

Detecting the carrier, and shortly before flying above it (Hermes was in close company of RFA Tidespring), his plane was intercepted by a FRG.2 "Phantom" of 29 Sqn RAF (XV 484), operating from RAF Wideawake (Sqn Ldr Morle at the controls)

Here are very rare pictures of this obscure fact of the Cold War.

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/8838/85796578.jpg
Tu-95 crew took this picture.

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/8778/bear02p.jpg
HMS Broadsword crew took this one.

http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/1...msenascens.jpg
And here is two of the Phantoms at RAF Wideawake

Regards!

jamesdevice 28th Sep 2011 19:02

Googling that Russian pilots name brings up a couple of interesting pages

Google Translate

Google Translate

Interesting Russian anecdotes re the increased use of Bears during the war, how the Russians found some of the Belgrano dead, and the behaviour of the UK fleet towards the Russian spy ship.
If the translation is accurate, it indicates that the Bear teams jumped from flying 200 hours / year, to 100 hours in April alone
"the missions that lasted up to 15 hours without any alternate aerodromes, often having lost radio contact with their base, usually ending in a thousand feet or less near the vertical of the two British aircraft carriers"
Apparently there were six Bear missions to spy on the fleet

wiggy 28th Sep 2011 19:33


(Sqn Ldr Morle at the controls)
If memory serves me correctly I suspect that's a typo and it's more likely to be Morley........

Marcantilan 28th Sep 2011 20:11

I wrote the second piece.

A better translation is here: Soviets in Falklands / Malvinas

Regarding the first article, six missions are the number that a CIA declassified paper informed. I think the number is wrong, the "Bears" were there almosty three times a week.

Regards!

jamesdevice 29th Sep 2011 00:40

very intrigued by your suggestion that the Russians were prepared to sink a British submarine if it launched a nuclear attack on Argentina.
Is that just your speculation or do you have proof?

Marcantilan 29th Sep 2011 02:10

I did not suggest that, I just pointed to a version told me by a credible person from former Soviet submarine circles.

In fact, I pointed that "the version seems ludicrous" Of course, the fact that Mr. Galtieri disclosed to Mr. Haig that he received such offer from the Soviets, and the disclosure of the "Legend" targeting system first real utilization adds a sense of reality of that history.

But just a sense, I still maintain that version is hard to believe.

Regards!

Stu666 29th Sep 2011 07:40

Marcantilan, interesting reading, thanks.

Your second piece mentions the use of satellites by the Russians. I wondered if you were aware of the book 'GCHQ' by Richard J. Aldrich (2010) which mentions the secret deciphering of Russian satellite intelligence by the Norwegians during the conflict, which was then shared with the British, effectively giving us satellite coverage that we wouldn't otherwise have had?

Marcantilan 29th Sep 2011 12:22

Hello Stu,

Yes, I learned about that capability from a Norwegian TV show ( Norsk lyttestasjon viktig brikke i Falklandskrigen - Brennpunkt - NRK , I use a translator...)

However, later I talked with former Soviet army personnel and with a former Polish navy officer and they told me that is unlikely, due to good ciphering and, most important, because all Soviet recon satellites had no radio links with earth stations to transmit gathered information.

Mr. Aldrich´s book gives more info about that?

Regards!

Thud_and_Blunder 29th Sep 2011 13:12

I enjoyed the bit in the translated account about the Chinooks trying "to damage the masts and aerials" of the surface ship with their downwash - suspect the auth sheet merely reflected 'ruthless wazzing' rather than any more serious intent.

2 TWU 29th Sep 2011 14:32

Well well, talk about a blast from the past. Thanks very much for the pictures, I have some of the ones we took of the Bears (there were 2 of them) but regret no means of uploading them onto Prune. The F4 crew was indeed Russ Morley & Nige Marks.

Marcantilan 29th Sep 2011 15:27

Thud:

Look at the Chinook pilot offer at page 55 here: http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research...20Campaign.pdf

And "Vulcan 607" (Rowland White) mentions that the offer was accepted...

2 TWU: Could I contact you privately regarding the pics you have?

Regards!

2 TWU 29th Sep 2011 16:13

Marcantilan, drop me a PM but please be aware I'm away an awful lot over the next couple of weeks.

2 TWU

Marcantilan 1st Oct 2011 20:08

PM Sent.

Another pic, in this case it looks like a Sea Harrier chasing the Bear.

(From HMS Antrim, copyright Chris Bolton)

http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/5...andharrier.jpg

Regards!

Marcantilan 3rd Oct 2011 15:15

More pictures from the same close encounter. Also from the Bear.

http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/2712/392odrap.jpg

http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/5...904170403b.jpg

Regards!

Thud_and_Blunder 3rd Oct 2011 22:21

Marcantilan,

Apologies for the delay in replying. Thank-you very much for the link, which I had not seen before and thoroughly enjoyed reading; it looks as though a well-known character managed to get himself into the printed record.

SkidMX 7th Oct 2011 17:31

Blimey,
that is indeed me in the back seat of the F4.

Have just dug several shots of the Bears (there were 2 of them) out of my Ascension Island album - I will scan them & post them here later.

We had early int that the Bear Ds had launched from Luanda & were heading towards the flotilla steaming North from the Falklands.

Russ Morley & myself had just been handed over the Q1 slot. The night Q1 team had been alerted a few hours earlier & were hoping to get scrambled before the handover!

Heading South East from Wideawake I got radar contact at long range at high altitude but descending towards the flotilla.

We completed our intercept & shadowed them down to low level from where the pictures above were taken.

We were also joined if my memory serves me right by a sea harrier launched from Hermes.

Have just checked my logbook, & see we completed a 1:30 hr sortie with no AAR before landing back at Wideawake.

Will get the pictures up here over the weekend.
Skid

McC 8th Oct 2011 10:58

I was the Q1 pilot who got woken up in the middle of the night and told to expect to be launched. Try getting to sleep after that! Then Morley and Marks breeze in after breakfast and off they go!! :{

More pics from Ascension,

[IMG]http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w...Untitled-6.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w...itled-1yty.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w...982/ASIF41.jpg[/IMG]

Stu666 8th Oct 2011 13:57


Hello Stu,

Yes, I learned about that capability from a Norwegian TV show ( Norsk lyttestasjon viktig brikke i Falklandskrigen - Brennpunkt - NRK , I use a translator...)

However, later I talked with former Soviet army personnel and with a former Polish navy officer and they told me that is unlikely, due to good ciphering and, most important, because all Soviet recon satellites had no radio links with earth stations to transmit gathered information.

Mr. Aldrich´s book gives more info about that?

Regards!
The book simply states that throughout the conflict the Norwegian signals intelligence base at Fauske regularly intercepted the Soviet satellite intelligence data. It doesn't say how they did it but if what you say about the Soviet satellites having no radio links is correct then one wonders if the satellite intelligence recovered by the Soviets after an overflight was then being transmitted by other means upon which it was compromised?

downsizer 8th Oct 2011 15:11

What was the Q load on those? 4x9Ls, Sparrows and a SUU?:confused::8

McC 8th Oct 2011 16:43

4xAim9 G,
4x Skyflash or Sparrow
Gun SUU23
2x wing Tanks

Normal UK Q bird had a CL tank instead of the gun.

SkidMX 8th Oct 2011 17:05

The View from the F4!
 
OK , here we go with some of the pictures taken using the standard 35 mm Pentax camera issued on QRA.
Have a close look at the rear fuselage closeup - looks like they had a rather bigger camera to use!

Skid


[IMG]http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...dmx/img389.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...dmx/img388.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...dmx/img387.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...dmx/img386.jpg[/IMG]

SkidMX 8th Oct 2011 17:11

....& a couple more
 
Here's a couple more extracted from my album....


[IMG]http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...dmx/img391.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...dmx/img390.jpg[/IMG]

Skid

downsizer 8th Oct 2011 17:19

Why 9Gs and not 9Ls? Were the Ls not readily available at that time?

McC 8th Oct 2011 17:46

Nice Pics Skid!

There were some Aim9L missiles around, I think the Navy had most of them. When we deployed to Port Stanley, we acquired some Aim9L and the aircraft had a mix of G and Ls loaded.

SkidMX 8th Oct 2011 19:39

Ta McC!

Downsizer - the 9Ls were just coming into service & as many as possible were sent further South for use on the Shars.

Whilst the US weren't openly assisting the UK effort I believe the supply chain for more AIM 9Ls ( & a lot of other stuff) was hurried along!

Skid

Green Flash 8th Oct 2011 20:00

If the Bear driver or crew are in Pprune (or if anyone knows them) it would be great to have their side of the story!

wiggy 8th Oct 2011 20:37


the 9Ls were just coming into service & as many as possible were sent further South for use on the Shars.
:ok:

Evening gents,

As I recall it I think we went from 9Ls back to 9Gs on the Wattisham wing in the space of 24 hours a few days before the Task Force sailed.....

( even after all this time you guys have the better war stories....:})

SkidMX 8th Oct 2011 20:48

We've never had a quiff like yours though Wiggy! ;)

McC 8th Oct 2011 22:00

You can see that the inboard missile is a Aim9L and it's partner is a G.

http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w...walkround3.jpg

BBadanov 9th Oct 2011 04:26


Blimey, that is indeed me in the back seat of the F4.
Hiya Nige, so it's "Skid" huh? You never did like "Nigel" LOL :p

Marcantilan 9th Oct 2011 15:19

Wow, Thanks Skid for the images and info! Now, we have really the two sides of the coin.

You are also the ones that buzzed the Soviet trawler also?

I will try to contact any of the "other party" crewmembers to show here.

Regards!

wiggy 9th Oct 2011 18:18

Skid/McC

Not wanting to high-jack your splendid thread and also not upset the "your not entitled, you're not in now" brigade I've put some other F-4/Phandet piccies in the History section..............

McC 9th Oct 2011 20:17

Now look what you've started! Posted some of my own. 30 years!!!!


McC

:{

BSweeper 10th Oct 2011 14:57

McC et al,

When we first went to Stanley, the standard fit was a single 9L and 3Gs mainly because we hadn't got many and we wanted to have at least one heat missile capable of head/beam attacks. The tricky bit was remembering where it was and cycling through to get at it.

By the way, except for your ability to dress up in strange green clothing with a funny thing on your head, you haven't changed a bit in 30 years.

Hope to see all on 11/11/11.

:ok:CP

APG63 7th Nov 2011 15:48

C44+4

17,400 lbs of fuel!

APG63 7th Nov 2011 15:49

Or C44+5 if you got the funny fit.

BEagle 7th Nov 2011 16:29

There were comfier places from which to snap Boris:


Taken with my Olympus PEN-FT half-frame with a 150mm lens long before we were given QRA Canons to use on the VC10K!

Chap in the back was quite friendly on that occasion.

Jabba_TG12 8th Nov 2011 14:03

Some great pics and good anecdotes as well. Nice way to spend an afternoon going down Memory Lane... :):D

Marcantilan 4th Nov 2015 21:48

A friend of mine find some other pics of the July 11th 1982 encounter, taken from RFA Tidespring:

http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...98174234_n.jpg

http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...32974497_n.jpg

To XV484 crew, members of this forum!

Best regards,

ORAC 5th Nov 2015 06:59

Ref post 18 and satellite commas interception.

lEO satellites designed for real time war operations. Data relayed using ground sites, relay satellites and data links. Eminently interceptable, and wouldn't be highly encrypted due to data latency issues for targeting.


SOVIET SATELLITES REPORTED OVER AREA - NYTimes.com

RORSAT and EORSAT - Staring at the Sea

http://faculty.fordham.edu/siddiqi/w...orsat_1999.pdf


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:55.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.