Lossie next?
 

More calculated leaks, or just a rumour/planning option...?

BBC News - Fears mount for RAF Lossiemouth future

Lossie Next:
 

Hopefully.



There is no better sight than RAF Lossiemouth receding in the rear view mirror

Makes an awful lot of sense to close it.

Big Up Lossie
 

Why? Isn't it usually BLU/BLU when the rest of the living world is YLO/YLO or worse! Goes for its local area low flying too!

Foldie:ok:

Lossie will no doubt close.
Way too many GOOD reasons to keep it open in terms of location, weather, low flying on the door step etc.
Oh well it dosent have St Andrews on the door step, and its too far for our Airships to want to come visit!
Yep, doomed :ugh:

Having spent some time there you are still not selling it to me :p

Not to mention our most Northern location in 'strategic' terms, and a significant political 'softener', twixt Whitehall and Edinburgh.

With Kinloss down I suspect there will be a tactical pause before any decision on Lossie or the Jocks will revolt.

Anyhow surely the best plan is to keep it with Bornado GR4 until about 2016 when that fleet will almost certainly draw-down somewhat. Then Lossie could go on C&M and be developed for the JSF (aka Dave) with the remaining Bornadoes at Marham until that closes circa 2022.

Fantasy basing - you've gotta love it!:ok:

I thought it was staying open as the JSF/JCA base due to extreme noise levels? Can't see her Majesty allowing them noisy wretched things disturbing the peace at Sandringham?? (ie Marham basing is out).

Quote:
Originally Posted by foldingwings http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...s/viewpost.gif
Why? Isn't it usually BLU/BLU when the rest of the living world is YLO/YLO or worse! Goes for its local area low flying too!

Foldiehttp://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...ies/thumbs.gif


Yes it is BLU a lot but that doesn't account for the days when howling winds terminate flying! Or when ice closes the whole area for a couple of weeks! Plus low flying is a little bit "Cold War", to use the modern vernacular. The logistic chain from the maintenance hub at Marham has a measurable effect on output. And finally, Lossie is a long way from the Army "customer" which makes the whole ALI thing a lot more difficult.

However the decision is not going to be straightforward for the political reasons already outlined above...

I'd a notion that I read somewhere that the furore over Lightning II's noise levels was all hot air.

Army.
 

I've got a feeling that Kinloss and Lossi will become Pongo land within a few years. That will help the local economy. They may even keep Lossi's flying status for exercises etc. It may be handy when we withdraw from Germany. Oh well, what do I know, I'm only a civvy....

Unfortunately the Army have a penchant for using runways as vehicle parking or ready-made foundations for barrack blocks: take a look at Catterick next time you're on the A1!

However, I agree that Morayshire could easily become squaddie-land. I offer you the following smilies to represent the reactions of the locals:

Neds :ouch:
Planespotters :{
Findhorn yachties / Moray golfers :mad:
Buckie fishwives :}:ooh:

And maybe even Gordonstoun might wish the RAF would come back!

I was under the impression the main noise concerns were during viffviffnozznozz.... Surely not an issue now?

F-35 Noise Levels
 

F-35 noise levels are a big issue over here in the USA with some communities taking legal action over a perceived threat to property values. Seemingly not everyone enjoys "the sound of freedom" ! The link, relating to a campaign opposing the basing of Air National Guard F-35s at Tucson International Airport, has some test data from USAF sources.

Noise Levels if the F-35 Comes to Tucson International Airport

Are the Scottish constabulary prepared for this.

Some would say the Jocks are already revolting:E

...No but Johannas will be a little more 'entertaining'

All the attendees of the Wednesday night "Grab a granny" will be pleased....

Which Base is Big Enough
 

Indications are that 6 sqns will remain, is either Lossie or Marham big enough to host that number of sqns?

Just give them independence
 

Well the Scots want independence, here is a chance to make it happen and save some serious cash. But it would have to be full independence, let them provide their own defence etc. I reckon we would save a fortune.

In fact if we did the same to Wales and NI we would be quids in, note the figure in the chart below of £48.4bn

Deficit would be sorted in a year, then we could start spending on defence again:}

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/...71_634x527.jpg

Strato Q .... Lossiemouth is plenty big enough to take 6 Squadrons!!! Had more than that when it was FAA HMS Fulmar;)

Nostalgia
 

No more Brontosaurus and chips in the Bothay.... :{

My guess is XV (R) to Marham, remaining sqn to Leuchars until it's time to lose another sqn, then they will go.

There seemed to be plenty of demand for an airfield in Moray, judging by the number of aircraft up at both stations for major exercises over recent years (and probably longer, but I wasn't there to see them). Surely Lossie would have a future even with only 2 Tornado Sqns and the resulting unallocated space and facilities supporting the exercises that Kinloss used to host.

Maybe the foreign aircraft meeting our maritime patrol commitments could be permanently based there too...

Would the moving of the GR4 necessarily result in the closure of Lossie? N QRA need a mil div, the GR4 sim may be used by a Leuchars-based sqn and as you say, Army or MPA could ensure it's survival. Anyway, I thought we discovered many years ago that closing an airbase actually costs us money (in the short term) due to the relocation expenses alone. :confused:

Wake-up and Smell the Coffee
 

Of course Lossie will close. With JSF orders reduced the only place they will go is to Yeovilton to be flown by the Fleet Air Arm again, why on earth would they want their carrier aircraft based in the North of Scotland only to have to embark what is left of an Air Wing off the South Coast.

Just Another Jocky - get with it what MPA? Would you believe it our Maritime Nation has had the wisdom to bin that capability.

As to turning Kinloss and Lossie to Army bases. Same arguement on location applies. The Army only really has one training area that is any good for any of their kit - Salisbury Plain. They will want all of their units near by and easily deployable from Brize International or any other of the Southern Airports that the Transport Aircraft Consortium PLC wish to operate from, the contract will cost far too much to have them picked up from Scotland.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I fear what are now seeing is the dying throws of the 100 year Air Force experiment

Quote:

---

Just Another Jocky - get with it what MPA?

---

From post #25

Quote:

---

Maybe the foreign aircraft meeting our maritime patrol commitments could be permanently based there too...

---

That MPA! :)

Never say never! eh old boy.:ok:

FB

Maybe if the RAF is going heavily down the UAV/RPV/drone (whatever they are called this week) route in the years to come then they should be looking to base them somewhere with relatively clear airspace, where training flights (presuming there are any) are less of an issue...... such as Lossie perhaps?

Biggus

Why on earth would the Army and Navy allow us to fly their RPVs. They are the ones who will end up using their product...

n/a

While my knowledge of RPVs is very limited I thought that there was a requirement for a recognised pilot (instrument rating, etc) to operate it in the vicinity of controlled airspace. I could be wrong.

While the Army operate the pint sized, elastic band wound up, RPVs that just go up a few hundred feet and look over the next hill, street, etc, the RAF currently operate the big toys. I was under the impression that is not about to change in the near term.

No doubt some expert in UAVs (39 Sqn maybe) will provide more detailed insight, if anyone with that background can be bothered to read a thread on Lossie..... ;)

Unit size
 

As a scribbler there's one thing that occurs to me. Whilst people are talking about squadrons, no one is talking about the number of jets on those squadrons, are they?

If you cut down on the numbers of jets per unit, that would make it much easier to squeeze six squadrons into one base, wouldn't it?

I don't think anyone is absolutely certain that Marham is 'safe' just yet. The great thing about aircarft is that they are mobile....


Has anyone thought that they could move the Tornados back to Cottesmore?:ooh:

The only certainty is that nothing is certain anymore.....

Is it sensible to concentrate all 'front line'* RAF bases up and down the A1(?)

*Apologies to those folk who will be flying out of BZN in a couple of years time.

It would be sad to see HMS Fulmar close but as always it is inevitable....Unless the RAF can wrestle up a few more aircraft to fly from their it doesn't make commercial sense to keep it open.

There's certainly an awful lot of BAE's finest engineers now based at Marham. Can't see too many of them wanting to move to Lossie. Cottesmore may be a different story however as it's closer to 'home' over in Blackpool, but I think the 4 hangars of CMU(F) may be a bit expensive to move (again) for only a few years before they are no longer needed.

1. Lossie Closes
2. XV(R) to Leuchars
3. Rest to Marham
4. JSF to Marham post GR4
5. Base Carriers at Kings Lynn

Problem solved!!!

You could park 'em end-to-end and XV (R) could use them as a relief landing ground! :E

It isn't HMS Fulmar, it is RAF Lossiemouth.

It was RAF Lossiemouth before it became HMS Fulmar, and became RAF Lossiemouth after HMS Fulmar.

HMS Fulmar 'sank' in 1972

I think he probably knew that - and it's probably had the desired effect.