PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Chinese CVA by 2010 (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/267073-chinese-cva-2010-a.html)

ORAC 8th May 2019 07:05

https://chinapower.csis.org/china-carrier-type-002/

Tracking the Type 002 – China’s third aircraft carrier


ORAC 28th Aug 2019 06:38

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/mili...ext-generation

China’s navy ‘set to pick J-20 stealth jets for its next generation carriers’

China’s military is likely to pick the country’s first active stealth fighter, the J-20, for its next generation aircraft carriers, according to military sources and a recent report on state media.


The J-20, made by the Chengdu Aerospace Corporation (CAC), appears to have a won a head-to-head contest with the FC-31, a fighter made by another company which is still undergoing testing.A military insider told the South China Morning Post that the Central Military Commission, the People’s Liberation Army’s top decision-making body, now favoured adapting the J-20 for its new carriers.

“The Chengdu Aerospace Corporation will announce some new products, which will include a new version of their J-20. You can guess what type it will be,” the military insider, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, said.

The FC-31 was independently developed by CAC’s sister company Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (SAC), which also produced the J-15 – the jets currently in use on the country’s only active aircraft carrier, the Liaoning.

Both aerospace firms are subsidiaries of the state-owned giant Aviation Industry Corporation of China, which specialises in designing and developing military aircraft, and were set up to ensure benign competition between manufacturers.



Asturias56 28th Aug 2019 08:02

ORAC - what is the current best estimate for the CVA-002 to start working up?

ORAC 28th Aug 2019 09:56

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_002_aircraft_carrier

The ship is expected to be launched in 2020 and enter active service in 2023.[10] It is estimated to have an aircraft capacity of about 40 fighter aircraft, several propeller powered transport and airborne early warning and control aircraft.[15]

https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/chin...-supercarrier/


Asturias56 28th Aug 2019 12:30

Many thanks!

ORAC 26th May 2020 06:25


ORAC 2nd Jun 2020 07:00

https://www.defensenews.com/training...eapons-at-sea/

China home-built aircraft carrier tests weapons at sea

BEIJING — China’s Defense Ministry said the People’s Liberation Army Navy’s only entirely home-built aircraft carrier is performing sea trials to test weapons and equipment as well as enhance training of the crew. Ministry spokesperson Ren Guoqiang said Friday the exercises were being conducted as planned, apparently unaffected by the country’s coronavirus outbreak.

The Shandong’s commissioning last year by Chinese President Xi Jinping underscored the country’s rise as a regional naval power at a time of tensions with the U.S. and others over trade, Taiwan and the South China Sea.

It is the second Chinese aircraft carrier to enter service after the Liaoning, which was originally purchased as a hull from Ukraine and entirely refurbished. Both are based on a Soviet design with a ”ski jump”-style flight deck for takeoffs rather than the flat decks used by much larger U.S. aircraft carriers. It is powered by a conventional, oil-fueled steam turbine power plant, compared to the nuclear fuel used by American carriers and submarines........

ORAC 28th Jul 2020 06:51

Mind you, not sure how they’d get airborne from a carrier with enough fuel to give any away.....

Shenyang J-15s practicing night buddy-buddy AAR...


etudiant 28th Jul 2020 13:27


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 10555896)
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/mili...ext-generation

China’s navy ‘set to pick J-20 stealth jets for its next generation carriers’

China’s military is likely to pick the country’s first active stealth fighter, the J-20, for its next generation aircraft carriers, according to military sources and a recent report on state media.


The J-20, made by the Chengdu Aerospace Corporation (CAC), appears to have a won a head-to-head contest with the FC-31, a fighter made by another company which is still undergoing testing.A military insider told the South China Morning Post that the Central Military Commission, the People’s Liberation Army’s top decision-making body, now favoured adapting the J-20 for its new carriers.

“The Chengdu Aerospace Corporation will announce some new products, which will include a new version of their J-20. You can guess what type it will be,” the military insider, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, said.

The FC-31 was independently developed by CAC’s sister company Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (SAC), which also produced the J-15 – the jets currently in use on the country’s only active aircraft carrier, the Liaoning.

Both aerospace firms are subsidiaries of the state-owned giant Aviation Industry Corporation of China, which specialises in designing and developing military aircraft, and were set up to ensure benign competition between manufacturers.

The J-20 is a big aircraft, 20 meters long, that will be a snug fit for carrier operations.

ORAC 22nd Nov 2020 08:31

Very Top Gun(ish), in more senses than one....




Asturias56 22nd Nov 2020 10:01

Chariots of Fire at the start but clearly a co-ordinated effort to raise the profile of the Carrier Force with the Chinese public

FODPlod 22nd Nov 2020 11:38


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 10932041)
Very Top Gun(ish), in more senses than one....


https://youtu.be/fE_dJJtE1e0

Can any of these aircraft launch (or land) carrying a decent payload?

Chugalug2 22nd Nov 2020 11:49

Is it true that they all have very poor eyesight and have to wear glasses? Asking for a friend.

Video Mixdown 22nd Nov 2020 16:42


Originally Posted by FODPlod (Post 10932174)
Can any of these aircraft launch (or land) carrying a decent payload?

Interesting question. I’m curious about the ski-jump.

I can see how in the low speed/high AUW take-off of a VSTOL type like Harrier/F-35B, the vertical thrust element is usefully augmented by the vertical motion generated by going up the ski jump, giving more time/height for the aircraft to accelerate to the speed needed to transition to wing-borne flight.

However with a conventional type the aircraft clearly needs to achieve flying speed by the time it reaches the end of the deck. If the engine thrust alone can achieve this, I’m not clear what advantage the ski-jump gives, beyond pointing the jet away from the sea. If anything I’d expect it to actually reduce acceleration just when it’s most needed.

It’d be interesting to hear Engines or Mogwi’s thoughts on this.

WE Branch Fanatic 22nd Nov 2020 20:39

The current PLA Navy carriers use STOBAR - launching with a ski ramp to cause an upward trajectory and increased angle of attack. It uses a lot of the deck - and so does the arrested recovery.

When the Soviets decided to build big carriers in the eighties, they decided not to go for a successor to the Yak-38 Forger, as they did not have the technology to compete with the Rolls Royce Pegasus engine. They also decided that developing a Steam Catapult would take too long.

It offers none of the advantages of vertical landing, reduces payload compared to either V/STOL or catapult launch, and uses a lot of deck.

Kiltrash 22nd Nov 2020 20:48

Am I missing something? I see ne evidence of a Steam or ELMS type catapult. So just a ski jump assisted take off.


ORAC 10th Jun 2021 07:05

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/20...ting-facility/

Stealth fighter mock-up appears at China’s aircraft carrier testing facility

MELBOURNE, Australia — China is stepping up its aircraft carrier program on all fronts with the emergence of a stealth fighter mock-up at a naval test facility, suggesting that China intends to operate the type on its ships.

Meanwhile, the construction of China’s third aircraft carrier is making steady progress, while a state media news clip shows carrier-borne fighters have been based at a naval air base, which has been geolocated to a naval air base in Hainan Island bordering the South China Sea.

The latter will be one of the final pieces to the jigsaw for China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy, or PLAN, to base its second aircraft carrier, the Shandong, and its associated air wing at Hainan, the main base of its South Sea Fleet……


Asturias56 10th Jun 2021 07:40

"geolocated" ???????????????????

Do they mean relocated?

ORAC 10th Jun 2021 09:29

No, they mean that metadata and other means - such as using satellite photos and videos to triangulate landmarks in photos - has been used to pinpoint the location of the airfield from the published photos.


while a state media news clip shows carrier-borne fighters have been based at a naval air base
https://www.bellingcat.com/tag/geolocation/

https://www.bellingcat.com/resources...o-geolocation/

https://www.bellingcat.com/resources...-verification/

Mogwi 10th Jun 2021 16:47

"However with a conventional type the aircraft clearly needs to achieve flying speed by the time it reaches the end of the deck. If the engine thrust alone can achieve this, I’m not clear what advantage the ski-jump gives, beyond pointing the jet away from the sea. If anything I’d expect it to actually reduce acceleration just when it’s most needed.

It’d be interesting to hear Engines or Mogwi’s thoughts on this."

There is a small advantage in launching conventional aircraft from a ramp because the first few seconds of flight are partially ballistic, giving the aircraft time to accelerate to above stalling speed. Vectored thrust gives a much greater advantage as the aircraft is "covered 1/3 in anti-gravity paint" as JF used to explain. This meant that the Jumping Bean could exit the ramp around 90 kts, with a stall speed of c160 kts. This obviously requires the ability to control the aircraft at extremely low IAS.

I believe that our American cousins have done trials with F 18s in the past but I haven't seen any data. There is also a limiting top speed for using a ramp because of nose leg compression - and extension!

Mog

Lordflasheart 10th Jun 2021 18:54

Doug Taylor
 
...
It's all right for you 'eros, but at my level there's a lot to be said for 'inshallah' or "OK God, I have control" when working with this sort of optimistic technology.God bless Doug Taylor - RIP 2019, age 89. He was 831 Squadron AEO in 1961-62 and 'Flight Deck Engineer Officer' of the Vic, as the FAAOA story below relates.


Lt Cdr Douglas Taylor - The Ski Jump

Lt Cdr Doug Taylor RN, the inventor of the ski jump, was a former deck officer aboard HMS Victorious in the sixties who was seeking an alternative to the Steam Catapult after witnessing the failure of the cats due to excessive heat in the far east. The runners either side of the cat slots had expanded due to the heat and the alert fighters could not be launched, so Taylor ordered the fire hoses to be turned on the deck to cool it down. Realising an alternative system with no moving parts would be desirable, he worked on his thesis at Southampton University and came up with a paper he called 'The Runway in The Sky', published in 1973.

HMS Invincible, lead ship of the class was laid down in 73, and launched in 77, without a ski jump (added during the fitting out stage). The ski jump was an upward-curving ramp at the end of the Short Take-Off run which imparted a positive vertical velocity to the aircraft. As well as offering more payload, the ski jump enhances safety because the aircraft is going upwards as it leaves the end of the ramp, giving more time to eject in the event of a problem. Initially, 7° ramps were fitted to Invincible and Illustrious, and Hermes and Ark Royal got 12° ramps. Later Invincible and Illustrious were refitted with 12° ramps.

On 30 October 1980, the test pilot, Lt Cdr David Poole from Boscombe Down, flying XZ439 made the first Sea Harrier launch from a ski jump at sea, from HMS Invincible.

LFH
...


Video Mixdown 10th Jun 2021 18:57


Originally Posted by Mogwi (Post 11059984)
There is a small advantage in launching conventional aircraft from a ramp because the first few seconds of flight are partially ballistic, giving the aircraft time to accelerate to above stalling speed. Mog

Thanks for that. Sounds to me as if a full fuel and weapons load could easily make it all pretty marginal.
On the subject of Harrier take-off performance, at Gioia del Colle in Aug 1995 (v.hot) we were filming Jaguars and Harriers on OP DELIBERATE FORCE for HQSTC. To catch the Jaguars getting airborne we had to position a long way down the runway. The Harriers were at about 500’ by the time they went past!

ORAC 30th Aug 2021 07:21

China ma6 be rethinking building CVA004 as a nuclear carrier, plus an update on CVA003.

https://min.news/en/military/e738f73...047e57bab.html

The 003 aircraft carrier will be launched. When will the 004 nuclear-powered aircraft carrier start?The conclusion may be unexpected

https://inf.news/en/military/43ca68f...c568c27a6.html

https://inf.news/en/military/5ef07d4...61cfa39c4.html

ORAC 11th Jun 2022 05:12

Reports that the construction equipment being cleared from the dry dock on carrier 003 with launch being imminent.

https://www.defensenews.com/global/a...craft-carrier/


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d9fbb36fc.jpeg

Asturias56 11th Jun 2022 07:53

I'd suspect she'll be launched around 1st October - National Day

ORAC 17th Jun 2022 21:18

Nope, already launched. Time & tide wait for no man….

China’s first conventional aircraft carrier "Fujian” is out of dock and afloat. (Second in size only to US Ford/Nimitz class).


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....15b97eab6.jpeg


SpazSinbad 18th Jun 2022 04:38


Asturias56 18th Jun 2022 07:32

"I'd suspect she'll be launched around 1st October - National Day"

Well that was wrong!! Thanks Spaz - they clearly can't wait for her!!

I like the look of that island as well

ORAC 21st Aug 2022 12:29

. On edge! A PLAN Shenyang J-15 aboard the aircraft carrier Liaoning. Notice that even the horizontal stabilisers are foldable? Yup, the J-15 is that big!


https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....5e43f840f.jpeg

MPN11 21st Aug 2022 14:10

Military Origami ... I like it!

ORAC 2nd Jan 2024 15:41

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....bf9a8bdd5.jpeg

SpazSinbad 3rd Jan 2024 19:47

Chinese Naval Modernization In 2023 Reviewed 03 Jan 2024
"...For carrier- and amphibious capability one of two headliners for Chinese naval modernization in 2023 was, as expected, again the third aircraft carrier Fujian. The first of her class, featuring electromagnetic catapults for conventional take off and arrested landing (CATOBAR) of fixed wing combat aircraft, continued her fitting-out at Jiangnan in Shanghai. Most importantly in November Fujian had begun with the first dead load-catapult test launches. The step underscores steady progress towards an expected first sea trial in 2024. Over the last few days of December tugboats towed the carrier back into drydock. The rationale for this move remains unknown. However it seems plausible that the hull will receive a thorough clean and inspection preparing Fujian for her sea trials next year [2024]...."
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news...2023-reviewed/
Same PHOTO as above: "Chinese carrier Fujian being towed back into drydock December 2023. Source: Chinese social media." https://www.navalnews.com/wp-content...21rp0zu7jq.jpg

Davef68 5th Jan 2024 14:03


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 11566529)

J-15 (mock-up?) on the back

ORAC 5th Jan 2024 14:21

I would imagine they have various airframes for checks on lifts, electrical connectors, EM interference checks etc.

Plus they’ll need to check datalinks for navigation systems, mission system updates etc.

Not_a_boffin 5th Jan 2024 14:35

That ship isn't at deep displacement yet by a long chalk. She's going to have problems with slamming on the sponsons - freeboard looks way too low.

Asturias56 5th Jan 2024 14:44

NAB - that's a very interesting observation and possibly something they haven't thought through. Any suggestions as to what restrictions that might put on her deployment when fully equipped?

melmothtw 5th Jan 2024 14:48


NAB - that's a very interesting observation and possibly something they haven't thought through.
​​​​​​​Serves them right for not checking with PPRuNE first.

Asturias56 5th Jan 2024 14:51

Appalling isn't it? They probably checked with the Daily Mail tho'...............

ORAC 5th Jan 2024 14:57

On her way to dry dock for hull inspection before sea trials later in the year.

How much difference t9 displacement will a full fuel, weapons, supplies, aircraft, manpower etc make?

(IIRC the T41s had to maintain a minimum of a 50% fuel load later in life, once they received a heavier radar antenna which made them top heavy?)

Not_a_boffin 5th Jan 2024 16:03


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 11569008)
On her way to dry dock for hull inspection before sea trials later in the year.<br /><br />How much difference t9 displacement will a full fuel, weapons, supplies, aircraft, manpower etc make?<br /><br />(IIRC the T41s had to maintain a minimum of a 50% fuel load later in life, once they received a heavier radar antenna which made them top heavy?)

Depends on the endurance figures (for both ship and air wing) primarily. But I'd expect to see something north of 10-12000 tonnes of additional weight at least. Based on length of 300m by beam of 39m that's likely to have her sitting around 1.5 m deeper in the water. Now - the immediate photos above are a little misleading compared to the distance shot in Oracs post #106 from June. However, those sponsons in way of the lifts and the one 20% aft of the bow do look as if they'll be a slamming risk in higher sea states.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:26.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.