PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   US Army Warrants (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/189612-us-army-warrants.html)

Darth Nigel 14th Sep 2005 14:47


Any idea what that might have been Chaps?
They realized you weren't a real officer?

SASless 14th Sep 2005 14:58

Ah, Darth...another one that does not get it....we are...as much as the Upper Classes hate it....once the old pen goes to the paper on SecArmy's desk....we get our admission ticket to the Garden of Eden....then a year later upon promotion....we then become commissioned officers as well... all the while being Warrant Officers. Kinda like a marriage between the Orange and Green....in a way.

After a fashion....I think it is a big joke being played....by who and on whom I do not know...but it is fairly comical when one stands back and watches the discussion.

eko4me 14th Sep 2005 15:35


After a fashion....I think it is a big joke being played....by who and on whom I do not know...but it is fairly comical when one stands back and watches the discussion.
Wonderful comment - I salute you! :)

Huron Topp 14th Sep 2005 16:09

SASless,

...."American Army Warrant Officer" going to an RAF Officers Mess, thanking all for their guidance.... and instantly....all bile and bitter....funny what might have changed between posts.
think you're being rather disingenuous making this statement. Not one single comment was made about you being a WO. The only pouncing had to do with your story re. the cowboy boots, as I'm sure you're well aware.

As for "Upper Classes", isn't that why WOs are now commissioned in the US Army, because your own upper classes didn't think you were qualified, or some such, to be Officers?

Darth Nigel 14th Sep 2005 16:58

But how can you be an officer, old chap?

I bet you don't even know the correct spoon to use to force recalcitrant turds out of your arse after days on field rations...

Jimlad 14th Sep 2005 18:28

Thinking of non entitled personnel using Messes, I was at Whale Island a few years ago when some CCF PO's (i.e. 15yr olds) turned up at the PO's mess on the island and asked for a beer.

They couldn't understand that Cadet PO isn't the same as real PO :D

effortless 14th Sep 2005 18:51

I have rather enjoyed this thread but I have a question, if I may presume? Why did our colonial cousins feel it necesary to make WOs "officers"?

Huron Topp 14th Sep 2005 23:52

Darth,


I bet you don't even know the correct spoon to use to force recalcitrant turds out of your arse after days on field rations...
one should know, that to be truly effective, one must use the salad fork...chilled.:ok: Butt, that may be for another thread.:}

Talking Radalt 15th Sep 2005 10:28

SH would use a sharp stick, obviously. ;)

Huron Topp 15th Sep 2005 12:30


SH would use a sharp stick, obviously.
Not the pointed stick? Maybe the soft cushion, or comfy chair?:E

Daedal_oz 15th Sep 2005 14:22

Effortless said,

I have rather enjoyed this thread but I have a question, if I may presume? Why did our colonial cousins feel it necesary to make WOs "officers"?
Isn't this a different paradigm to the one used by those systems derived from the British military?

I have always equated a US Army WO with an equivalent officer rank and treated them accordingly in terms of privelege.

WO1 = 2LT
CW2 = LT
CW3 = CAPT
CW4 = MAJ
CW5 = LTCOL give or take.

And they are, after all, employed for their technical proficiency much the same way that specialist RAF aircrew are employed. (Now there's a thought, why are RAF spec aircrew commissioned? Seems to me that the AAC has got it right.)

Finally, I guess they earned the right to use whatever rank system they wanted to after beating you last time round...

Wholigan 15th Sep 2005 14:29

To jump back to the original question on this thread, does the above post mean that a major should salute a CW5 in the US? (He asked disingenuously.)
;) :E

Daedal_oz 15th Sep 2005 14:40


To jump back to the original question on this thread, does the above post mean that a major should salute a CW5 in the US? (He asked disingenuously.)
That wasn't the original question. But my disingenuous response would be no more than one should salute an air force officer. :p

Huron Topp 15th Sep 2005 15:32

Cheeky, disingenuous buggers!;)

SASless 15th Sep 2005 16:36

Now Huron....you got American Warrant Officers figgered out finally....we are all of that!:ok:

W-1 equals a 2nd Lt in pay (roughly)
CW2 a 1st LT
CW3 a Capt
CW4 a Major
CW5 a LT Col

but all are junior to 2nd Lt's in rank....but Woe be the 2nd Lt that really believes that! Let him tangle with a 4 or 5....and see who comes up short on hind end.

BEagle 15th Sep 2005 20:04

WO1 = brand new grunt
CW2 = grunt
CW3 = old grunt
CW4 = bitter old grunt
CW5 = rich, senile old grunt

And the only salute any of the low class bug.gers deserve is an extended middle finger....

:p

West Coast 15th Sep 2005 22:35

"And the only salute any of the low class bug.gers deserve is an extended middle finger...."

I'll bet you got your ass kicked a lot at the O club didn't you?

He may be senile, but he ain't rich on what Uncle Sam pays.

SASless 15th Sep 2005 22:39

Beags....we thrive on that kind of treatment....and usually double it in kind....thus two upraised fingers in salute! Where's the beer?:ok:

Always_broken_in_wilts 15th Sep 2005 22:59

"Where's the beer"

Is that the warm real beer that we drink over here or the ice cold pish you serve up over there...................lets see you spin a credible counter to that :p

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced

SASless 15th Sep 2005 23:42

When it comes to beer....I am definitely on the side of the British. However since you guys have gotten central heating....room temperature beer is way too warm. I still prefer a bit of frost on the outside of the glass.

Always_broken_in_wilts 16th Sep 2005 07:06

Which is precisely why you guys will never master the art of making beer:p

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced

BEagle 16th Sep 2005 07:06

Why is Budweiser like making love in a canoe?
































Both are f*****g close to water!

SASless 16th Sep 2005 07:23

Beags dear chap,

Why is it I see Budweiser sold in the stores and behind the bars in pubs now? It could not be found years ago anywhere here.

Not that I would drink it here or at home!

Rakshasa 16th Sep 2005 08:13

Cause Bud is brewed over here these days. I'll stick to Becks. TVM.

Argus 17th Sep 2005 06:28

Beages old chap, right on point when you compare septic WOs to grunts.

Septics just can't understand the difference between a Master Ice Cream Dispenser First Class with "go faster" stripes on his/her sleeves for swimming 20 metres, plus a chest full of medals for giving blood at the Red Cross transfusion service, being a specialist in what he/she does; and a commissioned officer in a command role who is required to lead, inspire and manage others; and be accountable for same

Enough trouble trying to find commissioned officers with the "right stuff", let alone septic WOs with delusions of grandeur that stop short of actually taking charge of anything. Bit like some contemporary US politicians and federal public servants, I suppose.

Maple 01 17th Sep 2005 07:15


a commissioned officer in a command role who is required to lead, inspire and manage others; and be accountable for same
Sorry, did we have any of those? Inspire? Lead? Be acountable? Naaah, give me an old style WO

SASless 17th Sep 2005 07:16

The Green Eyed Monster arises methinks....or someone who tangled with one of those old time warrants.

ORAC 17th Sep 2005 08:21

Officers get saluted within their own service and by other national services because the regulations say so. Officers from services of other nations get saluted either as a curtesy or because of an official agreement between the nations. In particular, within NATO there is an agreement and this includes the definition of equivalent ranks. Within this agreement Warrant officers are ranked below officers and above enlisted servicemen.

The US may have decided to give some of their WOs commissioned officer status, but they have not had an amendment made to the NATO equivalent rank structure and, since NATO only works with unanimous agreement, I wouldn't hold my breath.

So said WO will not get saluted because he is not entitled to be saluted.

Always_broken_in_wilts 17th Sep 2005 08:26

Oh mighty ORAC,

Straight shootin tex and stating the "bleedin" obvious...........wonder if our bumpkin cousins will understand it:E

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced

Argus 17th Sep 2005 09:41

SASless

No green eyed monster I'm afraid. Just reinforcing the point that, when it comes to comparisons outside of the US, septic WOs are further down the food chain than commissioned officers.

tablet_eraser 17th Sep 2005 16:16

WC
When you learn where to put apostrophes (Kennedy's what?), I'll learn to accept your views on the British Monarchy. The Queen's punctuation being better than yours, I'm content with her commission. Her Majesty's powers are in fact somewhat extensive, and she can indeed exercise them - in the 70s she appointed Harold Wilson as PM when he had a majority of -30 because of a hung Parliament. Seems a little more efficient than battling an election result through the courts, only for a bench of judges to select the candidate with an outright minority... := Her general role (advise, warn and counsel) has certainly been exercised on a number of occasions, with varying degrees of success. She is the Commander in Chief, so that the British Armed Forces are by definition apolitical. Sir Winston Churchill had to revise some pretty shaky decisions when the Chiefs of the Imperial General Staff said that they'd wait to hear the King order them to do things personally...

As others have said: WARRANT officers hold a warrant from the Secretary of State for Defence here in Blighty, and from the Secretary of the Army/Navy/Air Force in the US. They are, therefore, by definition, clearly, undeniably, NOT commissioned, a commission being a document from the Head of State (HM or Bush) appointing someone as an officer. Ergo, Warrant Officers will not be saluted by British personnel of any rank, at any time, for any reason.

It's not intended as a slight to our US cousins, it's a simple matter of precedence and protocol. I'd suggest that if you're really that bothered about someone not saluting you, you're likely to be a total pain in the arse to work with.

An apocryphal story tells of a Flight Lieutenant (pronounced "leff-tenant", SASless ;) ) who was being "mentored" (bollocked) by a WO. The WO concluded the "meeting" (arse-chewing) with the comment, "... and never, EVER confuse your rank with my seniority!"

T_E

West Coast 17th Sep 2005 17:14

I trust your little queens spelling and punctuation's skills are better than yours as well. I ran your post through the ole spell checker, you aint got nuthin to crow about pal.
As I've said before, royalty is like a placebo pill. Makes you feel good but doesn't do a damn thing for you.

HAL Pilot 17th Sep 2005 18:06

To quote tablet_eraser: "As others have said: WARRANT officers hold a warrant from the Secretary of State for Defence here in Blighty, and from the Secretary of the Army/Navy/Air Force in the US. They are, therefore, by definition, clearly, undeniably, NOT commissioned, a commission being a document from the Head of State (HM or Bush) appointing someone as an officer. Ergo, Warrant Officers will not be saluted by British personnel of any rank, at any time, for any reason."

As has been said by other from the U.S. military, except for WO1, U.S. Warrent Officers (WO2 - WO5) ARE commissioned by a Head of State, receiving their commission from the President and having it confirmed by the Senate. Only WO1 receives a Warrant from a service secretary.

This whole conversation reeks of British snobiness. Just like calling your enlisted "other ranks" like they are insignificant.

You expect us to recognize and respect your armed forces' customs and structure. You should respect ours in return. Should an enlisted U.S. soldier not salute a British Pilot Officer because he has a funny rank? (In the U.S. soldiers opinion.) After all, both the Pilot Officer and the U.S. Warrant Officer (WO2 - WO5) are commissioned by Heads of State.

The Helpful Stacker 17th Sep 2005 18:17


Should an enlisted U.S. soldier not salute a British Pilot Officer because he has a funny rank? (In the U.S. soldiers opinion).
No. The enlisted US soldier should salute the Pilot Officer because of the Plt Off NATO rank of OF-1, the equivalent of a 2nd Lieutenant.

As has been said, a US military WO wouldn't usually receive a salute from a British (or indeed any other NATO) enlisted/OR because they are classed as below commissioned, as shown here.

BTW it should be noted that it is also NATO who prescribe the use of OR to mean Other/Enlisted Rank and not just the UK.

SASless 17th Sep 2005 21:17

Folks,

I don't expect to be saluted....never did....that was the beauty of being an old time Warrant Officer...and not being in any way associated with the US Army...I don't give a **** who gets saluted or not. If you read back over the posts....you will see that is my position and the only time I suggested British Enlisted and Non-Commissioned officers should salute American Army Warrant Officers was out of a sense of military courtesy and discipline. What you Teabags think about "Sceptic" ranks matters not a wit.

I would suggest if you cannot accept the fact the American Warrant Officer is a full fledged card carrying member of the Officers Mess then you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

I can assure you that doubt the fact that Warrants are officers....and thus entitled to the fullest extent of military courtesy....that if one of my Warrants was refused entrance to your Officers Mess....I would take my aircraft and crew and piss off to the nearest pub and let your OC explain to his chain of command why that happened.

Being an old time Warrant Officer....we learned not to suffer fools well. Anyone that persists in suggesting they would not extend and demand the proper military courtesy as a serving military officer is an idiot.

Skip the banter chaps...banter is simple...one line jesting....and I fear some of you are past that point.

Vortex_Generator 17th Sep 2005 21:18

"US UK

CW1 WO1 - 2/LT
CW2 Lt
CW3 Capt
CW4 Major"

So does a US Captain salute a CW4 then?

SASless 17th Sep 2005 21:19

Vortex....read the post...it clearly said equivalent in pay and allowances....not rank. CW5's are junior in rank to 2nd Lt's.

wg13_dummy 17th Sep 2005 21:32


full fledged card carrying member of the Officers Mess
Do you not mean the Officers Club. Quite a bit of difference. :ok:

SASless 17th Sep 2005 21:41

ZH...you finally got part of it right....junior in rank to all other officers....the newest 2nd Lt outranks a CW5 in our rank structure.

But do not confuse Rank with horsepower....I can assure you a CW5 has a lot more horsepower than a 2nd Lt.

Daedal_oz 17th Sep 2005 21:48

Is it now appropriate to ask where and how midshipmen fit into all of this?

They are members of the Officers Mess but are not commissioned. I believe they hold officer status but exist at the bottom of the ladder and are not saluted by the ranks/ratings.

As I've said before, I accord US WO1 - CW5 the respect that goes with their experience and time in service (less saluting). Surely this is a courtesy that is easily offered by true professionals. I have no problems with the US deciding that they should be members of the 'officer class'. The use of the CW rank allows a more recognisable differentiation between those of us who have completed generalist commissioning courses and those who have greater responsibilities and experience in technical fields, such as specialist aircrew.

This is the way it is. How hard is it to get on with life and worry about more pressing matters?


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:40.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.