RAAF PIGS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAAF PIGS
In my daily delivery of the gossip columns from Australia, the ABC is reporting that there is now a serious push to scrap the F111's by 2006, a decade earlier than planned.
Any news from your world EX DD or IWANTMYHUDBACK?
This is part of the article as the link was not playing the game.
Plan to scrap F-111s
By Patrick Walters
August 5, 2003
THE RAAF's 35 F-111 warplanes - Australia's front-line strategic strike force - could be retired from service from 2006, a decade earlier than originally planned, if the Government accepts a controversial option put forward by the Defence Department.
F-111: expensive, obsolete
A key issue is whether early retirement for the long-range F-111s could leave a gaping hole in Australia's front-line defences early next decade.
The Government has accepted strategic advice that Australia faces no conventional military threat for the next 15 years and has placed greater emphasis on the defence force working in coalition operations further from Australia's shores.
Any news from your world EX DD or IWANTMYHUDBACK?
This is part of the article as the link was not playing the game.
Plan to scrap F-111s
By Patrick Walters
August 5, 2003
THE RAAF's 35 F-111 warplanes - Australia's front-line strategic strike force - could be retired from service from 2006, a decade earlier than originally planned, if the Government accepts a controversial option put forward by the Defence Department.
F-111: expensive, obsolete
A key issue is whether early retirement for the long-range F-111s could leave a gaping hole in Australia's front-line defences early next decade.
The Government has accepted strategic advice that Australia faces no conventional military threat for the next 15 years and has placed greater emphasis on the defence force working in coalition operations further from Australia's shores.
Last edited by Fox3snapshot; 5th Aug 2003 at 19:15.
Lupus Domesticus
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mother of God, does this insanity know no bounds? Is it a virus? Did they catch it from us? "Strategic advice" - from who? The Chinese??? The Indonesians??
Perhaps this un-named omniscient psychic adviser, who knows every detail of the world's future for the next fifteen years, would be so good as to share the next few weeks' winning Lotto numbers with us?
Perhaps this un-named omniscient psychic adviser, who knows every detail of the world's future for the next fifteen years, would be so good as to share the next few weeks' winning Lotto numbers with us?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BlueWolf
Agreed, it always made me laugh when our intel cronies talked about the "perceived threat" and based our strategic posture on that with a timeframe of potential attack.....I am sure the US revised its concept of perceived threat after 911, maybe the ADF should too!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Isn't Western defence hinged on provision of a web of credible deterrences?
And isn't it a cop-out for 'Canberra' to suggest that it should focus more on coalition membership - or, put more bluntly, saving yet more money by yet further reliance on Uncle Sam?
And isn't the real issue that, as foreign commentators have often forecast, there is no way that the RAAF's F111 (no matter how much beloved and DSTO-husbanded) would continue to provide a credible deterrent (either fatigue-wise or technology-wise) much beyond 2005. For the last 6 years or so, obvious to most except 'Canberra'. Are we about to see yet more breathtaking DoD decisions - inspired, no doubt, by its home-spun cottage industry of strategic 'thinkers'?
And isn't it a cop-out for 'Canberra' to suggest that it should focus more on coalition membership - or, put more bluntly, saving yet more money by yet further reliance on Uncle Sam?
And isn't the real issue that, as foreign commentators have often forecast, there is no way that the RAAF's F111 (no matter how much beloved and DSTO-husbanded) would continue to provide a credible deterrent (either fatigue-wise or technology-wise) much beyond 2005. For the last 6 years or so, obvious to most except 'Canberra'. Are we about to see yet more breathtaking DoD decisions - inspired, no doubt, by its home-spun cottage industry of strategic 'thinkers'?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps we will have to get the old Phantom's back to fill the gap again until a credible replacement arrives on the tarmac...
There used to be one parked up at the RAAF Museum Point Cook, might be able to get it cranked up!
There used to be one parked up at the RAAF Museum Point Cook, might be able to get it cranked up!
I agree with Blue Wolf
Has Uncle Helen been sharing Kiwi secrets with the far West Island (AKA Australia) again? Amazing what you can come up with whilst rolling the dice and reading the magical cards..
Don't believe anything she says Mr Howard !!
Once again, beware of dykes with fingers in the hole.
Don't believe anything she says Mr Howard !!
Once again, beware of dykes with fingers in the hole.
The F111 has been an unsustainable dead duck for about the last 2 to 3 years, its just taken this long for the RAAF to be able to convince the politicians.
Its been the pollies that have kept it going this long.
Its been the pollies that have kept it going this long.
Scarey Intell
My main problem is this quote:
The Government has accepted strategic advice that Australia faces no conventional military threat for the next 15 years and has placed greater emphasis on the defence force working in coalition operations further from Australia's shores.
Good on the pollies for trying to get the most out of the Pigs. If Australia needs a new long range strike aircraft, then they should look into it ASAP. However, pretending that the world will be a sunny rainbow paradise full of back-slapping peaceful beautiful people is a very wrong and dangerous perception.
15 years? Mate, I don't even know what I'm going to be doing next week. Let alone a bucketload of crazy terrorists who seem to enjoy learning to fly - but are afraid of landing...
The Government has accepted strategic advice that Australia faces no conventional military threat for the next 15 years and has placed greater emphasis on the defence force working in coalition operations further from Australia's shores.
Good on the pollies for trying to get the most out of the Pigs. If Australia needs a new long range strike aircraft, then they should look into it ASAP. However, pretending that the world will be a sunny rainbow paradise full of back-slapping peaceful beautiful people is a very wrong and dangerous perception.
15 years? Mate, I don't even know what I'm going to be doing next week. Let alone a bucketload of crazy terrorists who seem to enjoy learning to fly - but are afraid of landing...
ftrplt
Wasn't the whole fleet grounded this time last year after some sort of fuel tank "explosion"? Think the sqn were at Darwin or Tindal when it happened. Feel free to correct the above "facts".
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Usually Somewhere Else
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know of some Maachi's for sale at a good rate. Full service history, never been raced or rallied, one careful owner, surround sound etc. Perhaps they could look into buying them to replace the 111's.Apparently after you have owned/operated these jets for a few years any potential threat to the owning country COMPLETELY DISAPPEARS!
Not owned by li'l ole ladies though...
It sounds as though one or two Knucks are upset at being shot down by Pigs....
Although nowhere near as fast, the odd MB339 has done the same. Cheaper too !!
Although nowhere near as fast, the odd MB339 has done the same. Cheaper too !!
Last edited by Runaway Gun; 6th Aug 2003 at 16:44.
F3S,
no rivalry mate, been out of it for a while now.
The fact that there was no F111 involvement in Afghanistan or Iraq should answer your question.
The best capability for the last few years has been the Recce birds, they are useful.
2Port, problems started a while before that.
Runaway Gun, good try.
no rivalry mate, been out of it for a while now.
The fact that there was no F111 involvement in Afghanistan or Iraq should answer your question.
The best capability for the last few years has been the Recce birds, they are useful.
2Port, problems started a while before that.
Runaway Gun, good try.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strike Assets
ftrplt,
Well with the amount of strike assets based here alone (12 B1's for example) and throughout the Middle East (F15E's/F16's Kuwait) and Diego Garcia (B52's, B1's), I am not suprised they didn't need the F111's. The FA18's freed up US assets in the initial phases of the ops in Iraq whilst conducting support for their tankers and AWACS platforms and then got in amongst it with CAIRS etc with the troopers.
With complete air superiority in both theatres there was nothing tactical about the arrival and departures of the strikers and fighters that would have justified the need for a low level dash capability. From the post Afghan debriefs that have been released (I might add they are still moving mud and rocks around there on a daily basis as I write) most of the ops were medium/high level and once again negating the need for deep penetration, dash capability. The B1's FL250/FL260 transit and loiter profiles testomony to that.
Off note the F15's and 16s from Kuwait set records for mission length with 4 F15's conducting a mission of 15.5 hours with 10 refuels...... breaks the previous standing record held by an F111F which was on "Eldorado Canyon" the strike on Lybia. I wonder how many refuels he had?
Also of interest is that 2 B1's can deliver more JDAM than a carrier air wing, and the Buff's and Bones delivered 73% of the ordinace in Afghanistan, just to put my comment on the availability of 12 B1's and B52's for both Afghanistan and Iraq into perspective.
You only have to look at Indonesia's response to our purchase of the extra G's, with an official complaint to the International Court because we did not "consult" them on the purchase of said machines. If that isn't a small hint that the F111 establishes itself as a deterent I am not sure what is.
Well with the amount of strike assets based here alone (12 B1's for example) and throughout the Middle East (F15E's/F16's Kuwait) and Diego Garcia (B52's, B1's), I am not suprised they didn't need the F111's. The FA18's freed up US assets in the initial phases of the ops in Iraq whilst conducting support for their tankers and AWACS platforms and then got in amongst it with CAIRS etc with the troopers.
With complete air superiority in both theatres there was nothing tactical about the arrival and departures of the strikers and fighters that would have justified the need for a low level dash capability. From the post Afghan debriefs that have been released (I might add they are still moving mud and rocks around there on a daily basis as I write) most of the ops were medium/high level and once again negating the need for deep penetration, dash capability. The B1's FL250/FL260 transit and loiter profiles testomony to that.
Off note the F15's and 16s from Kuwait set records for mission length with 4 F15's conducting a mission of 15.5 hours with 10 refuels...... breaks the previous standing record held by an F111F which was on "Eldorado Canyon" the strike on Lybia. I wonder how many refuels he had?
Also of interest is that 2 B1's can deliver more JDAM than a carrier air wing, and the Buff's and Bones delivered 73% of the ordinace in Afghanistan, just to put my comment on the availability of 12 B1's and B52's for both Afghanistan and Iraq into perspective.
You only have to look at Indonesia's response to our purchase of the extra G's, with an official complaint to the International Court because we did not "consult" them on the purchase of said machines. If that isn't a small hint that the F111 establishes itself as a deterent I am not sure what is.
Last edited by Fox3snapshot; 6th Aug 2003 at 13:02.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
So trade them all in for a couple of the BUFFs the Spams are putting in storage and buy some decent stand-off weapons like Storm Shadow to go with them then? Not needing to buy as many tankers might even cover the cost..... 
Grandpa Aerotart
After all the upgrade programs over the years exactly what part of the F111 is 'old'?
The 'no threat for 15 years' and 'they are getting old/expensive' arguments are, IMHO, just justifications for getting rid of them for short term financial gain.
As Indonesia continues to unravel, leaving in it's wake ample opportunities for Fundamentalist Islam to attempt, through violence, to create a Fundamentalist Pan Islamic State, we will be rueing the day we let the Pigs capabilities go.
The Indonesian archepelego has 1000s of little islands where terrorist training camps quite possibly already exist and I believe Australia will need the capability to strike those on an adhoc basis in the not to distant future. Before we are hit by them in this post 911 world.
Having said that if the Pigs do go, and lets face it real politic always seems to win, what's wrong with F15E as a replacement? Why does Australia always have to go with the untried replacement for aircraft, submarines etc.
A fleet of F15D & E would replace the F18s/111s with some savings in pilot costs etc, etc.
The Indons/Malaysians are getting Migs with all sorts of payload/ range, performance etc....kind of doubt it is with Thailand in mind!
The JSF is FUGLY.
Buy proven, top quality...and/or keep the Pigs.
Chuck
The 'no threat for 15 years' and 'they are getting old/expensive' arguments are, IMHO, just justifications for getting rid of them for short term financial gain.
As Indonesia continues to unravel, leaving in it's wake ample opportunities for Fundamentalist Islam to attempt, through violence, to create a Fundamentalist Pan Islamic State, we will be rueing the day we let the Pigs capabilities go.
The Indonesian archepelego has 1000s of little islands where terrorist training camps quite possibly already exist and I believe Australia will need the capability to strike those on an adhoc basis in the not to distant future. Before we are hit by them in this post 911 world.
Having said that if the Pigs do go, and lets face it real politic always seems to win, what's wrong with F15E as a replacement? Why does Australia always have to go with the untried replacement for aircraft, submarines etc.
A fleet of F15D & E would replace the F18s/111s with some savings in pilot costs etc, etc.
The Indons/Malaysians are getting Migs with all sorts of payload/ range, performance etc....kind of doubt it is with Thailand in mind!
The JSF is FUGLY.
Buy proven, top quality...and/or keep the Pigs.
Chuck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In addition to the 10-12 hour average sorty times and 10+ refuels in the Afghan theatre for the F16's, F18's and F15's with light loadouts, tankers offloaded in an average 24 hour period 2 million pounds of gas. The aircraft to shine were the B52 and B1's who had a long loiter time waiting for target vectors. This "compressing of the kill chain" reduces from hours or days in the tarditional bombing model, to minutes. Once again an environment where the F111 would excel.
It is also important to note after these 2 campaigns that the US has decided to pull 23 of its recently mothballed B1's out of storage from AMARC, and added Litening II pods on the B52's.
Statistically the most successful strike fighter in Desert Storm was the F111, with no loss to enemy fire in the highest density of air defence outside of central Europe. The F111F was the backbone of the coalition precision bombing fleet, outnumbering all other types equipped with laser designating equipment. This success is attributed to its combination of range, payload and speed.
The early retirement of the F111 from the US fleet was also politics as funding issues arose with the development and introduction of the B2 and the F22 raptor. To keep McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) and General Dynamics (now Lockheed Martin) in business concessions had to be made....bye bye F111.
It is also important to note after these 2 campaigns that the US has decided to pull 23 of its recently mothballed B1's out of storage from AMARC, and added Litening II pods on the B52's.
Statistically the most successful strike fighter in Desert Storm was the F111, with no loss to enemy fire in the highest density of air defence outside of central Europe. The F111F was the backbone of the coalition precision bombing fleet, outnumbering all other types equipped with laser designating equipment. This success is attributed to its combination of range, payload and speed.
The early retirement of the F111 from the US fleet was also politics as funding issues arose with the development and introduction of the B2 and the F22 raptor. To keep McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) and General Dynamics (now Lockheed Martin) in business concessions had to be made....bye bye F111.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Newcastle/UK
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
