Red Arrows - Value for money?
Champagne anyone...?
Frankly I'm surprised you could want for anything other than "Champion" crisps. They are, after all, champion!
Anyway, having been feasting on MREs for inflight for the last 10 days or so I'm going to suggest that we do away with inflight catering and buttie boxes all together and just get a box of compo instead. And a box of Champion crisps.
Anyway, having been feasting on MREs for inflight for the last 10 days or so I'm going to suggest that we do away with inflight catering and buttie boxes all together and just get a box of compo instead. And a box of Champion crisps.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excellent idea. However, none of us are sufficiently qualified to decide on the brand of crisps to be supplied. I believe it would be in the best interests of the Service if at least a one-star was appointed to oversee the brand choice (complete with an office of support staff; also a new-build on a greenfield site may be necessary).
Clearly, this is a case where there must be a series of trials carried out in conjunction with Boscombe Down, to ensure that the chosen crisps can withstand plus 45 'g' down to minus 10 'g', and be at least half-way edible between +75 and -100 deg celsius. It is also essential that the bags be tested to ensure that they do not burst when subjected to cabin altitudes in excess of 60,000 feet. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office will need to negotiate terms with a number of countries to obtain the most favourable annual costs over several years to enable extensive use of their facilities to conduct hot and cold weather tests. Trials should also be conducted to ensure that the chosen bag fits into the standard box without the need for in-flight catering staff to bash the bags with a mallet to fit them in; in addition to having intact crisps, considerable savings would be made in obviating the need to procure the latest mallets. If necessary, Defence funds (limited to single figure millions) could be made available to crisp manufacturers to enable them to redesign and resize their bags specifically for the Forces; the smaller bags would lead to additional savings in the long term, since there would be less crisps per bag and therefore the manufacturer would charge less per bag. Money could also be saved by foregoing any kind of tasting trial, since this has been irrelevant in the past and of little significance in the future.
Consideration should be given to the formation of a Joint Service Department, with a one-star as head of each of the Service Depts, with a 3-star in overall command. This 3-start post will be rotated every 2 years between all 3 Services. The results of the trials should be circulated at the highest level for comment, before being passed to the Procurement Executive for them to process tender applications. Crisp manufacturers' Executive Boards should invite the Executive staff fom the Procurement Executive and the Joint Service Department, together with other selected other staff, to Farnborough and Paris airshows (as corporate guests, all expenses paid, of course) for discussion on the relative merits of their products. Other Flag, General and Air officers of the Services and their staffs must also attend these corporate briefings, since the supply of crisps will be a joint Service affair - it accords with the latest policy on going 'Joint' to make and be seen to make savings wherever we can. It may also be useful for the manufacturers to meet high ranking individuals, who, in the best interests of the Services, might be invited to become Board members to oversee product production and development.
French products should, of course, be excluded from consideration in view of the prevalence of BSE in that country.
After about 9 or 10 years, the chosen product will appear in the butty boxes. If the manufacturer has the misfortune to become insolvent after the process is complete, it will be of little significance, because the structure is in place for the process to be rapidly re-started.
Thus the money saved from disbanding the Reds will have handsomely paid for the whole process and real savings will now imerge. However, it would be useful to retain the Department because their posts would be useful for Innsworth to enable them to post in likely career people due to the demise of yet more front line units (thus losing command posts to assess future CAS-likely candidates).
The recruitment budget will need to be increased significantly to offset the effects of the loss of the Reds.
BWoS would also have to find another way of selling their products abroad, the cost of which would be added to the procurement bill for the British Forces.
The nett result in scrapping the Reds would therefore be a negative saving of several millions.
Since it is likely that this Forum is read by staff at the highest level and the definition of logic does not appear in the Central Staff Handbook, I look forward to an early announcement setting up the new Joint Service Department, at the same time announcing the date for the disbandment ceremonies and the laying up of the Standard of the Red Arrows in Lincoln Cathedral.
Clearly, this is a case where there must be a series of trials carried out in conjunction with Boscombe Down, to ensure that the chosen crisps can withstand plus 45 'g' down to minus 10 'g', and be at least half-way edible between +75 and -100 deg celsius. It is also essential that the bags be tested to ensure that they do not burst when subjected to cabin altitudes in excess of 60,000 feet. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office will need to negotiate terms with a number of countries to obtain the most favourable annual costs over several years to enable extensive use of their facilities to conduct hot and cold weather tests. Trials should also be conducted to ensure that the chosen bag fits into the standard box without the need for in-flight catering staff to bash the bags with a mallet to fit them in; in addition to having intact crisps, considerable savings would be made in obviating the need to procure the latest mallets. If necessary, Defence funds (limited to single figure millions) could be made available to crisp manufacturers to enable them to redesign and resize their bags specifically for the Forces; the smaller bags would lead to additional savings in the long term, since there would be less crisps per bag and therefore the manufacturer would charge less per bag. Money could also be saved by foregoing any kind of tasting trial, since this has been irrelevant in the past and of little significance in the future.
Consideration should be given to the formation of a Joint Service Department, with a one-star as head of each of the Service Depts, with a 3-star in overall command. This 3-start post will be rotated every 2 years between all 3 Services. The results of the trials should be circulated at the highest level for comment, before being passed to the Procurement Executive for them to process tender applications. Crisp manufacturers' Executive Boards should invite the Executive staff fom the Procurement Executive and the Joint Service Department, together with other selected other staff, to Farnborough and Paris airshows (as corporate guests, all expenses paid, of course) for discussion on the relative merits of their products. Other Flag, General and Air officers of the Services and their staffs must also attend these corporate briefings, since the supply of crisps will be a joint Service affair - it accords with the latest policy on going 'Joint' to make and be seen to make savings wherever we can. It may also be useful for the manufacturers to meet high ranking individuals, who, in the best interests of the Services, might be invited to become Board members to oversee product production and development.
French products should, of course, be excluded from consideration in view of the prevalence of BSE in that country.
After about 9 or 10 years, the chosen product will appear in the butty boxes. If the manufacturer has the misfortune to become insolvent after the process is complete, it will be of little significance, because the structure is in place for the process to be rapidly re-started.
Thus the money saved from disbanding the Reds will have handsomely paid for the whole process and real savings will now imerge. However, it would be useful to retain the Department because their posts would be useful for Innsworth to enable them to post in likely career people due to the demise of yet more front line units (thus losing command posts to assess future CAS-likely candidates).
The recruitment budget will need to be increased significantly to offset the effects of the loss of the Reds.
BWoS would also have to find another way of selling their products abroad, the cost of which would be added to the procurement bill for the British Forces.
The nett result in scrapping the Reds would therefore be a negative saving of several millions.
Since it is likely that this Forum is read by staff at the highest level and the definition of logic does not appear in the Central Staff Handbook, I look forward to an early announcement setting up the new Joint Service Department, at the same time announcing the date for the disbandment ceremonies and the laying up of the Standard of the Red Arrows in Lincoln Cathedral.
FJJP:
"BWoS would also have to find another way of selling their products abroad, the cost of which would be added to the procurement bill for the British Forces"
Perhaps they could offer a free lifetime supply of crisps?
"BWoS would also have to find another way of selling their products abroad, the cost of which would be added to the procurement bill for the British Forces"
Perhaps they could offer a free lifetime supply of crisps?
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FJJP,
Excellent methodology, but aren't you being a bit optimistic on the timing? 9 or 10 years sounds a bit unrealistic, bearing in mind the need to choose the correct type of potato, and ensure that sufficient quantities can be produced securely and to the right standard? Suppliers to be security vetted, of course. You may wish to infiltrate Macdonalds' HQ, since they do have some of the best spud men in the business. Or maybe do a tech transfer agreement.
Also, to boost export sales, would you consider local assembly under licence?
Excellent methodology, but aren't you being a bit optimistic on the timing? 9 or 10 years sounds a bit unrealistic, bearing in mind the need to choose the correct type of potato, and ensure that sufficient quantities can be produced securely and to the right standard? Suppliers to be security vetted, of course. You may wish to infiltrate Macdonalds' HQ, since they do have some of the best spud men in the business. Or maybe do a tech transfer agreement.
Also, to boost export sales, would you consider local assembly under licence?
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another committee should be formed to assess the effects of the oil that the crisps are cooked in. If the crisps are to replace other foods in the butty-box the calorific content of the crisps must be equal to or exceed the energy content of the deleted foods.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since MOD are unaware of the EC regulation requiring crisps to be contained in an airtight form of packaging and to be consumed within a set period after manufacture those who have had sight of the draft requirement report that it only states that the crisps should be contained in a paper bag and that salt should be packaged separately, a blue twist is suggested. The chairman of the board convened to produce the draft, 87 year old retired Admiral Sir Hardly Worthit was heard to say " Thats the way I've always liked em, difficult to get but somebody must do it, try a chap called Smith".
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kit Kat!
In my day we would have insisted on Waggon Wheels.
But seriously, I think FJJP's idea wiith subsequent embellishments is a super plan, but don't forget the mandatory rule that if there is a change of UK government before the end-point that you have to go back to the beginning and start all over agian.
Don't really think its worth starting. If it ain't broke....
In my day we would have insisted on Waggon Wheels.
But seriously, I think FJJP's idea wiith subsequent embellishments is a super plan, but don't forget the mandatory rule that if there is a change of UK government before the end-point that you have to go back to the beginning and start all over agian.
Don't really think its worth starting. If it ain't broke....
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You seem to have forgotten to include a £5bn stealth crisp development project and eat-off. After all, you wouldn't want to be caught behind enemy lines without the latest technology in savoury snacks.
Each packet must avoid the use of radar-reflective materials, and come in a fetching range of colours to include khaki, olive, battleship grey and snowflake. Furthermore, the packet shall not produce noise audible to the human ear at ranges greater than 3 feet.
The snack itself must avoid detection by being odourless and having a stealthy crunch, as well as being manufactured in the regulatory colour for each theatre of operation. In addition, it must produce no bodily after effects such as those resulting from excessive consumption of BBQ Pringles.
Each packet must avoid the use of radar-reflective materials, and come in a fetching range of colours to include khaki, olive, battleship grey and snowflake. Furthermore, the packet shall not produce noise audible to the human ear at ranges greater than 3 feet.
The snack itself must avoid detection by being odourless and having a stealthy crunch, as well as being manufactured in the regulatory colour for each theatre of operation. In addition, it must produce no bodily after effects such as those resulting from excessive consumption of BBQ Pringles.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good point on the packaging. In order to reduce the number of RAF suppliers, maybe the packets could be made by sellotaping together bits of chaff, then coating the resulting bag with stealth surface coating, or paint, as I believe it's called.
Then, after consumption, the bags could be collected and the stealth coating removed; the bags could then be cut up again and the bits returned to stores for re-issue as chaff.
My God, I had no idea that defence procurement was so complex.
Then, after consumption, the bags could be collected and the stealth coating removed; the bags could then be cut up again and the bits returned to stores for re-issue as chaff.
My God, I had no idea that defence procurement was so complex.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: roughly near Everleigh DZ
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Happy days guys!
OK, lets go for Walkers for the first 9 yrs of the procurement plot and then.... and this will show 'em we're mean wheelers and dealers, yup, you got it, we,ll go for Smith's crisps, only with Walker's flavours, Champion packets and El Quaver engines, and stuff them into KitKat boxes and we'll call it the Future Large Eurocrisp.
Just another thought; instead of 9 egos in close form'n why not just paint six little red toy jets on the underside of the support Albert?.... doh! that'll never wake up the truckie nightshift at Akrobleari, silly me.
OK, lets go for Walkers for the first 9 yrs of the procurement plot and then.... and this will show 'em we're mean wheelers and dealers, yup, you got it, we,ll go for Smith's crisps, only with Walker's flavours, Champion packets and El Quaver engines, and stuff them into KitKat boxes and we'll call it the Future Large Eurocrisp.
Just another thought; instead of 9 egos in close form'n why not just paint six little red toy jets on the underside of the support Albert?.... doh! that'll never wake up the truckie nightshift at Akrobleari, silly me.
Last edited by DummyRun; 23rd May 2003 at 07:57.