Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Who's the best - RAF League Tables

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Who's the best - RAF League Tables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Apr 2003, 18:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Who's the best - RAF League Tables

There's been a lot of F3 vs GR4 banter here lately. Let's find out for real who the best operators are (all types). From my personal experience Leuchars fighters are better than Leeming ones and GR7s and better than GR4s. Jags are somewhere between the 2 (but that's just a personal view). Some GR4 Sqns will get 3 bombers out of 4 over a target and others will get none when faced with a fighter threat. Some GR4s won't even come near a CAP while GR7s will always have a go!

Does anybody have any ideas for assessing a Sqn/aircraft's performance both against similar types and against an adversary? Bomber vs bomber, bomber vs fighter and fighter vs fighter comparisons for example. Whilst the ACMI is a good tool for this it removes the important factor of terrain masking (Jags and GR7s better than GR4s) and reduces the effectiveness of real-world GCI (regularly get a computer picture relayed through Showground).

What should be assessed and who would be top dogs?
Britney Spears is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2003, 21:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Where the heart belongs
Age: 55
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Devil

Britney Spears

You asked the question "Let's find out for real who the best operators are (all types). " and then limited your answers only to one or two seat fast jets, is this because your operational knowledge is such that you think these are the only RAF jets that fly operations or would you like us to include all the jets that conduct operations against opposition targets?
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2003, 21:55
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No insult meant

Sorry Sideshow. Whilst I didn't mean to exclude any aircraft from the list I did tend to focus on types that are able to do Affiliation sorties against other types in an adversarial role. For example a Chinook is capable of Affil whereas an E3D isn't. An SF Herc crew is but a route Herc crew isn't. If you can do Affil you can measure yourself against an adversary, including Spadeadam and Spaces.

The whole point of the thread is that we get away from the 'my mates and my plane is the best' mentality unless they can back it up with some kind of head-to-head result.
Britney Spears is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2003, 00:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Who's the best

Sounds like a good idea to me. It'd certainly beat the usual 'I'm better' rubbish.

I think you'd need to limit the challenge to CR crews though. Each type could have a specific role such as point defence for fighters, bombs on tgts for the muds, evasion and collection for the helos and pies eaten in and hour for the truckies. You could post the results here for everybody to see like....

25 Sqn vs 31 Sqn:
25 Sqn 2 kills out of 4 (2 points) 31 Sqn 2 a/c over target (2 points)

Keep a rolling score and the Sqn with the best average wins the coveted PPrune trophy (and 2 months in the Gulf!)

I think the Chinooks would do quite well, always been impressed with the way they fly along motorways to confuse the radar picture.
Radar Monkey is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2003, 07:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South of the Fens again!
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not to confuse the radar picture - it's because the nav kit is so good that they're using the AA map and following the road signs!
opso is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2003, 14:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Land of the Rising Taxes
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radar Monkey,

It seems, without any intended criticism, that like the rest of the RAF, you have very little idea about the true capabilities of the Nimrod force !!

If you had you would realise that the truckies would have absolutely no chance when it came to pie eating
Stan Bydike is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2003, 16:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Puken
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pie eating? Get real.....

Curry. Ice cream. Full english breakfast. Steaks. And thats just in the A/R track.....
Farfrompuken is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2003, 07:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why don't all you crabs load up with warshots, shoot it out and then see who's left? Then you will know who's best!!
Moneyshot is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2003, 09:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Puken
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seem to recall a time when 216 sqn ate:

4.5 steaks per crewmember, with an average finish time of 7mins 36 seconds. Meal consuption rate(MCR): an unbelievable 81%!!!

In an eating affil match with 206 sqn (Nimrods), we averaged 4 meals per crewmember(PCM), with aqn average of 9 mins 12s per crember (PCM), compared to a poultry 206 score of 3.75 meals PCM, and their average time was 18.105mins.

206 sqn MCR undisclosed.......

No accounting for hard facts.

He who eats more/fastest wins.............................................
Farfrompuken is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2003, 20:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,848
Received 328 Likes on 115 Posts
3.75 chicken meals per crew member on 206? That takes some doing - sounds pretty fowl to me!


"Who's the best? Why hell, sugar, you're looking at him......"
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2003, 05:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Farfrompuken. Was that a poultry score of chicken meals or a paltry 206 score of 3.75 meals......??
Art Field is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2003, 22:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: wales
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's not big and yellow it's not worth flying!
God loves 22 sqn.
cpmafia is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2003, 04:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Cocktail Bar
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello Sweetie, still poking around, I see. I've always been miffed that you didn't take me up on my offer to meet me in that bar in Edinburgh.

But for this thread, remember the golden rule when probing for information.

"I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours."

You started this so "What's your operational status, eh?"
Sugar Daddy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.