Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Possible RAF Harrier MidAir Collision Meham, Norway 1982

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Possible RAF Harrier MidAir Collision Meham, Norway 1982

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2002, 06:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: JAAland
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possible RAF Harrier MidAir Collision Meham, Norway 1982

Hi!

Thought maybe someone on this forum could cast some light on this new "old" thread. All taken from www.nrk.no

------
New focus on 20-year old aircrash
A new tv documentary reveals new information not previously known to the public on the "Gamvik-accident" twenty years ago.


Publisert 19.11.2002 14:05
In March 1982 a Norwegian civil airplane with 15 people crashed outside of the coast of Finnmark in Northern Norway, not far from the Soviet border.
The crew and the passangers were all killed.

Three official inquiries have all stated that there were no other air traffic in the area at the time of the accident.

In a tv documentary tonight on Norwegian National Broadcasting a number of witnesses show that this conclusion is wrong.

In the programme, both locals and people from the Norwegian defense tell the same story. Two defense intelligence reports tell the same. They have all observed British fighters in the area at the time of the accident. Two British Harrier fighters were observed. One of the fighters was followed by several witnesses from where the sivil airplane disappeared and all the way to it's base in Tromsø. A Norwegian pilot observed a Harrier landing in Tromsø with signs of damage.

These observations mean that the Harriers crossed a forbidden zone. During the cold war military aircrafts where not allowed to fly East of 24 degrees longitude, not to provoke the Soviet Union.

In March 1982 the Nato exercise Alloy Express took place in Northern Norway. The RAF exercised tactical flyoperations.

----

Best regards
SlowAndSilly is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2002, 12:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post record from "crashdatabase.com"

Date: 03/11/1982
Location: Mehamn, Norway
Airline: Wideroe's Flyveselksap
Aircraft: de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter 300
Registration: LN-BNK
Fatalities/No. Aboard: 15:15
Details: The aircraft crashed while on a flight from Berlevåg to Mehamn after the failure of the tail fin and rudder in moderate turbulence. Overload due to a combination of clear air turbulence, mountain wave and the pilots spontaneous improper actions. There is some controversy surrounding this crash including the possiblity the aircraft was shot down by a NATO jet fighter.
newswatcher is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2002, 22:33
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,406
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
BBC - Wednesday, 20 November

Norway probes 1982 mystery crash

The Norwegian Government has ordered an investigation into the possible involvement of British fighter jets in the mysterious crash of a Norwegian commuter plane 20 years ago. The Twin Otter plane crashed into the sea in Norway's Arctic north in March 1982, killing all 15 people on board.

Earlier investigations concluded the plane's tail fin had been damaged by turbulence, and discounted reports by witnesses who said they had seen British fighter planes close to the crash site. But a documentary aired by Norwegian television on Tuesday featured several witnesses - including a retired Norwegian air force officer - saying two Royal Air Force plane approached the site just before the accident.

Transport Minister Torild Skogsholm said she would establish a special investigating commission within a few days.

The accident occurred in Norway's northernmost province of Finnmark. Although Norway - like Britain - is a member of Nato, it declared Finnmark off limits to the alliance during the Cold War. Norway was worried military activity in the province, might provoke the neighbouring Soviet Union.

In the television documentary retired Norwegian Lieutenant-Colonel Per Garvin said he watched by radar as two British Harriers entered Finnmark. He said one of the pilots requested an immediate landing because of technical problems after the commuter plane crashed.

"Even though I asked, he didn't say what sort of technical problems," Mr Garvin told the programme.

The documentary says at least 30 other witnesses reported seeing foreign aircraft over Finnmark on that day.

The Norwegian military said it would release all documents related to the crash.
ORAC is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2002, 06:48
  #4 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Raises more questions than answers, for example:

How did Mr Garvin know that the two aircraft he watched on radar were Harriers?

If one aircraft landed then there must be a record of that.

Where would the harriers have come from. 3 & 4 Sqdns were busy in Germany and had no out of area Ops in those days. Only leaves 1 Sqdn so mebbe someone on here knows what they were doing in 82.

Sounds like b*llocks to me.
BDiONU is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2002, 08:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post similar case?

On a similar note, in Dubai in the 80s, a rumour was circulating that the Gulf Air 737 crash at Jebel Ali, in September 1983, was not caused by a bomb, but by a missile fired during local exercises.
newswatcher is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2002, 13:04
  #6 (permalink)  
contact_tower
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
"If one aircraft landed then there must be a record of that. "

The landnings at Tromsoe and Bardufoss is fully recorded. Both belonged to No 1 sqd.

One possible reason for the sightings is the 2 RoNAF CF-104 operating in the area just after the crash was discovered.
 
Old 21st Nov 2002, 15:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slowandsilly, were you expecting someone to come forward and say "Ah yes I remember that day, it was me"?
rivetjoint is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2002, 17:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re-opened

The case is being re-investigated anyhow. All norwegian military personell holding info. have been cleared to speak.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2497043.stm

Things were pretty tense in 1982. Doesn't seem too unbelievable if you ask me.
sidestep is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2002, 21:29
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: JAAland
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rivetjoint

No, but I was hoping for comments. I hope I'm not offending you, but this is an anonymous forum (the reason for PPRUNE in the first place?) and the right one for questions like this. From papers the last few days stories from an ex-RAF pilot explains how the harriers were in the area at the right time. What I find terrefying about the whole case is the apparent coverup.

The case will be solved this time, to many details have been published. I'm not after someone to blame, but I want to see the truth.

Last edited by SlowAndSilly; 22nd Nov 2002 at 21:40.
SlowAndSilly is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2002, 16:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There may be some Gentlemen and Officers from the RAF who have the courage and honesty to tell the true story.
Snowonice is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2002, 10:08
  #11 (permalink)  
contact_tower
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The program on norwegian tv is completely one-sided, they have not bothered to check any of their info.

The traffic log clearly states that the Harriers that landed at Bardufoss and Tromsoe could not have made it to the accident site and back. (Gr.3 with 2+ hours flight time? )

Me and most colleauges (we have som paranoid chaps here as well ) here at Bardufoss thinks it all BS.

I hope the guys from No.41 sqn dos not get bothered by the media while they are here.
 
Old 27th Nov 2002, 12:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post article in DT(27/11)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...7/ixworld.html
newswatcher is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2002, 12:42
  #13 (permalink)  
contact_tower
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The highlight in the program, was the man that claimed to have seeen the aux air intakes on the Harrier (The Harrier1/2 a mile away, and moving at 300+ kts)
 
Old 27th Nov 2002, 15:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tromso is an awfully long way from the site of the Twin Otter crash. About 200 miles if the D Tel map is accurate. Why the focus on RAF Harriers? Other aircraft must have been taking part in the exercise. Understand there were Jags as well, and maybe (?) US/NATO aircraft? Any thought on Sea Harriers? Were they in the area/on the exercise?? A Sea Harrier to the untrained eye would look like a GR3.
QuidProQuo is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2002, 20:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bristol
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets hear it from the people close to the incident. Is the 1 Sqn pilot who landed with technical problems shortly after the accident still with us? Any other 1 Sqn personnel from the detachment? Does the CAS read this forum?

Dick W
Dick Whittingham is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 11:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bodoe
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mid-air in Norway

IO at Airforce Radarstation, Lt. Alex Kverneland on record with positive ID of two Harriers from 1 Sq - c/s Red 1 and Red 2 - to have strayed east of 24 East 11. marsch 1982.
Ground-technician on record to day stating he observered som major scratches an dents in the belly-area of Harrier Red 2 that requested emergency landing at Bardufoss 11/3-82.
Wonder what really happened that day?
Cola is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 13:00
  #17 (permalink)  
contact_tower
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Any thought on Sea Harriers? Were they in the area/on the exercise??
The Sea Harriers was based on a carrier in the Ofoten fjord, which is another 60 NM to the SW of Bardufoss.

From what personel here remember, the Harrier that landed at Bardufoss sustained the damage when one wing landing gear collapsed during towing. (no gear pins)

Another thing, is that the Harrier landed with ordonance on board. This means that it made a ground stop at Bardufoss for arming after departing Tromsoe, not departing to the NE like some radar operator states 20 years later.
 
Old 28th Nov 2002, 14:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bodoe
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mid-air

Ground stop? Was the fighter on the ground at Bardufoss after Tromsoe-departure and before PAN and emergency landing again at Bardufoss? And why aint anybody coming forward with the reasonable answer if the know that it's all a hussle about gear pins and landing gear?
Cola is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 14:42
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
This is the last thing CAS needs, as OC 1 Sqn at the time, there could be lots embarrassing publicity for the RAF coming up.
Training Risky is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 15:04
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bodoe
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CASualty

It shouldn't be embarrassing at all, if there's no skeletons in the locker. What's the fuss? On the other hand... If someone somewhere is trying to jam sensitive information. Well, flak and incoming are to be expected. Hopefully the new board of inquery will be outfitted with kevlar.
Cola is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.