Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Streaming Choice held against you?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Streaming Choice held against you?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Nov 2002, 14:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pfffft
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Streaming Choice held against you?

Is it true that if during the various selection interviews for Pilot (in the RAF) you state you wish to fly anything other than fast jet, it is held against you?

A.S.I
Another St Ivian is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2002, 14:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure what you mean by held against you. Certainly they would probably look more favourably upon someone with an open mind than one who was for example, rotary or bust. Bear in mind that the way that the system is geared, everyone starts as a potential FJ mate and are only diverted from that on the basis of aptitude. Regardless of whether you consider this to be fair or appropriate, it is the system that you would be trained under and they are less likely to select you if you are already rebelling against it. Just go and say that while you are keen to fly FJ you would be very happy were you to go the ME or RW route. Once you are in training there is nothing to stop you from expressing a non-FJ preference, just be aware that they may still send you FJ regardless.
Hertz Van Rental is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2002, 16:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
ASI

It is certainly true that the preference you state during training for either FJ, RW, or ME is totally ignored by the streaming board.
In my case, I had good IF and formation skills, poor low-level nav skills, so put helicopters as my last choice of 3... Guess what I was streamed!!!

So, just remember it is all very nice saying what you want, but it's bums-on-seats that the board is interested in.
Training Risky is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2002, 00:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Escaped from ABZ...
Posts: 311
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Streaming boards further down the line don't tend to take too much notice of preferences until you get to the role disposal stage, and even then it is still only a preference. As has been said it is bums on seats that is the over-riding factor and nothing you do or say is likely to change this. As for preferences at initial interview, anything other than FJ is likely to lead to some fairly probing questions, in which case you had better have a cast iron reason for that particular preference. Notwithstanding the fact that RW pilots are generally better looking, more co-ordinated with a more highly developed sense of humour than their FJ and ME counterparts, it is probably best to say that your first preference is for FJ.
detgnome is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2002, 06:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Some years ago, when the RAF had actually stopped ME training (the Pigs were dead and the Wetdreams were grounded after CFS had a double hush), it certainly was 'FJ or bust'. You had to have got as far as a FJ OCU to stand a chance of getting restreamed to ME if you were binned from your OCU.

I was at Brawdy at the time as a student on 234. One day, fairly early in the course, one of the staff came in and said "Of course, if anyone's finding it hard going, you can always volunteer for helicopters..." He said it as a joke, but 2 people took him at his word, went to see the Boss and asked for a transfer. Their bags were packed and they were off the stn in less than a week. Not to rotary training though, but to the Aircrew Reselection Board at Biggin Hill. We never heard what became of them after that......
BEagle is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2002, 07:21
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pfffft
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oops

Thanks for all the replies, they have been really good but I was looking for information on this at the selection stages (i.e. OASC) rather than at streaming level. Sorry, my fault really.

ASI

Last edited by Another St Ivian; 30th Jun 2004 at 13:17.
Another St Ivian is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2002, 11:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think detgnome and myself answered your question. They are looking for people who want to be FJ pilots. So tell them what they want to hear. IMHO to do anything else is to demonstrate a lack of effective intelligence.
Hertz Van Rental is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2004, 21:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In response to Training Risky

You dont sound particularly impressed with your streaming boards decision. It is certainly true that the RAF wants bums on seats but it the bums with the right aptitude that they want. Notice how i said right aptitude, not level of aptitude. They look at suitability for role and part of that is your choice although not a lot of it. Unless you are abopve average for everything at the moment, it is particulaly difficult to get FJ, Rightly or wrongly.

I just hope you didnt rock up at Shawbury winging about the boards decision. I bet you have done ok though.
bpster is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2004, 10:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the desert!
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"..........RW pilots are generally better looking, more co-ordinated with a more highly developed sense of humour than their FJ and ME counterparts"

DetGnome, last time I looked you were only three feet tall and filled with expanding foam!

As for streaming tell them what they want to hear, it's a game of hoop jumping - go through enough hoops and your in!
SandChopper is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2004, 11:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Wow this is an old thread!

Bpster, my point was that I was not completely suitable for RW, and I knew it... its just a shame that the streaming board didn't.

I went on to get chopped on the last sortie of a RW OCF - and subsequently missed out on the ME gravy-train that every other chopped RW pilot jumped on to! (I was denied a re-stream by PMA in spite of 2 x ME recommends from STC and JHC - due to a
'surplus on the ME front-line until 2010'
And no I didn't whinge at Shawbs, I gave it everything I had - even though i knew it wasn't right for my skill-set.

Oh well, there goes a million quid of Joe Public's money....
Training Risky is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2004, 12:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Risky, maybe there was another reason why you weren't offered ME if "everyone else" was getting it. I know that METS is full to overflowing at the moment with ex valley guys who were all worried that there weren't enough seats for them, however they got the slots because they were obviously worthy, even though there wasn't a massive demand for them. All i am saying is, maybe other factors came into play when you were chopped.

In response to the initial poster, be honest. If you want to fly Rotary, there must be a reason which is sincere which will be admirable at the interview as opposed to "I wanna fly jets SIR!!!"to which they reply, "Bull****, my grandmother wants to fly jets".
PPRuNeUser0172 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2004, 13:17
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pfffft
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All responses welcome....but the question is nearly 2 years old now and somewhat out of date!
Oh by the way, I said I'd like to go FJ when I got asked.

ASI
Another St Ivian is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2004, 14:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ASI

What was the outcome of your OASC visit then??

Regards

DS
PPRuNeUser0172 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2004, 20:47
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pfffft
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mixed bag really, completed parts 1 and 2 but due to an eyesight snag I could only be a Pilot for the FAA or the AAC. Later had a retest which showed I was ok again for the RAF but decided I didn't want to dive into appeals and such like (it was only for a 6th form schol). After spending the summer getting my PPL I had a rethink about things and have decided not to pursue the RAF.

ASI
Another St Ivian is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.