Another Walt? and a Chief Constable at that!
TBW, and that's not all ........ by a loooooong way it seems. 
Firstly, cheers for that link. I had a look at another link in the margins of that site where he claims in an interview how he "experienced loss of life in active service" which, if false as it seems to be, is a despicable claim and an insult to all those who have witnessed such shocking events! See the bit on Chapter 13 “Wounds that run deep” quite near the top of the web page below......
https://roguetrader1980.wordpress.co...ls-to-murders/
This seems to get worse and worse ......................
Firstly, cheers for that link. I had a look at another link in the margins of that site where he claims in an interview how he "experienced loss of life in active service" which, if false as it seems to be, is a despicable claim and an insult to all those who have witnessed such shocking events! See the bit on Chapter 13 “Wounds that run deep” quite near the top of the web page below......
https://roguetrader1980.wordpress.co...ls-to-murders/
This seems to get worse and worse ......................
Last edited by Hot 'n' High; 15th Mar 2024 at 10:53.
The following users liked this post:
Do you think the man ever suffered from "Imposter Syndrome"?
The following 3 users liked this post by Hot 'n' High:
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Northampton
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More lies on YouTube, he claims he was the national lead for crime detections while he was just a Superintendent. What else has this man lied about that we have yet to uncover?
Last edited by Saab Dastard; 31st Mar 2024 at 10:29. Reason: inappropriate comparison
The gift that keeps on giving
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,966
Received 2,862 Likes
on
1,228 Posts
Speaking of Walt’s, I see that although the RAF Association quickly removed Vic Norman's image of him wearing the wings he is not entitled too, he is still using the image to promote his business.
https://www.aerosuperbatics.com/about-us/founder/
..
https://www.aerosuperbatics.com/about-us/founder/
..
Last edited by NutLoose; 3rd Apr 2024 at 09:38.
Speaking of Walt’s, I see that although the RAF Association quickly removed Vic Norman's image of him wearing the wings he is not entitled too, he is still using the image to promote his business.
https://www.aerosuperbatics.com/about-us/founder/
..
https://www.aerosuperbatics.com/about-us/founder/
..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,966
Received 2,862 Likes
on
1,228 Posts
Update on Vic Norman.
His new uniform turned up sporting wings and was informed he could wear them, but that had not come from the RAF, but the Sqn he was made an honorary member off, so he was unaware until it was pointed out that it was wrong, at which point he removed them.
Update on Nick Adderly, his file has been passed to the CPS to determine if he should be charged.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newsm...on/ar-BB1looap
His new uniform turned up sporting wings and was informed he could wear them, but that had not come from the RAF, but the Sqn he was made an honorary member off, so he was unaware until it was pointed out that it was wrong, at which point he removed them.
Update on Nick Adderly, his file has been passed to the CPS to determine if he should be charged.
The IOPC said today it had completed its criminal investigation and referred evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service to consider whether to bring a criminal charge.Emily Barry, the IOPC regional director, said: “Following careful investigation, we have now submitted an evidential report to the Crown Prosecution Service. It will be for the CPS to consider whether to bring any criminal charge.
“A referral to the CPS is made when the IOPC investigation indicates that a criminal offence may have been committed. It does not mean that criminal charges will necessarily follow. The CPS will decide whether charges should be brought, based on the test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors.”
“A referral to the CPS is made when the IOPC investigation indicates that a criminal offence may have been committed. It does not mean that criminal charges will necessarily follow. The CPS will decide whether charges should be brought, based on the test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors.”
