Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Haythornthwaite Review of Armed Forces Incentivisation

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Haythornthwaite Review of Armed Forces Incentivisation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2023, 10:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 81 Likes on 33 Posts
Sounds like something for MORDEN and CASTLE to get after then??
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2023, 12:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet
Sounds like something for MORDEN and CASTLE to get after then??
possibly.

but why not just keep the scheme that (sort of) works for them?
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2023, 12:53
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 81 Likes on 33 Posts
Saving money…?



Officer rates above. Supplement 4 wages below for soldier pilots. The flying pay is the same.




Last edited by Lima Juliet; 25th Jun 2023 at 13:06.
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2023, 13:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet
Saving money…?



Officer rates above. Supplement 4 wages below for soldier pilots. The flying pay is the same.

if I were going to look for workforce cost savings, I wouldn’t start there, even in the Army.
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2023, 16:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 81 Likes on 33 Posts
As they say in a well known UK business…



With the savings they could employ more engineers to get the Apaches and Wildcats more serviceable?
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2023, 17:48
  #26 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet
trim it out - I have no idea why the AAC continue with the Soldier Pilot scheme. They end up way more expensive overall compared to direct entry officer entry but have less utility other than as a “driver airframe” and now an instant WO2 after training? The Senior and Junior Services seem to have latched onto this higher cost over lower utility fact, how come the AAC and their Army masters haven’t had that epiphany yet?
All NCO pilots have at least 4 years service before attending the Army Pilots course, some will be AAC ground-crew and have experience and direct knowledge of Aviation Operations, but many others will be from across a broad selection of the rest of the Army. It is this cross-section that contributes to the All-Arms battle knowledge that helps Aviation understand intimately the ground commanders intent when providing support. Having Artillery, Infantry and Combat Service Support soldier pilots is a great example of getting "utility" from "drivers, airframe". NCO pilots are not as distracted by the burden of command, career courses, Staff College and moving up the Monkey Tree before set age limits as Officers are, so they naturally get more flying experience and generally become almost like PAS was intended to be - a group of experienced and professional aviators. The "high cost" is a red herring. Service continuity and experience carry a price, that is what the Army pays for with experienced NCO pilots.

I would agree the Warrant Officer after pilot training would be a serious misstep. The Army may be more and more specialized with very technical trade groups, but currently if you carry rank in the Army, you are expected to have the experience and knowledge to discharge the duties of that rank. It would be hard to see how anyone with a limited purview of Army operations would be able to do that with little more than 5 years service - unless they created a "specialist" group of Aviation WO2 who stayed firmly in that lane. Not sure how interactions with the 15 year Warrant Officers would go in that scenario. The Army has proven a couple of good points over the years, (1) Flying is a young persons game, the sooner you grab them the more utility you get, (2) You don't need rank or a commission to be an effective battlefield pilot. The move to WO2 would seem to indicate either the lesson hasn't stuck, or it's simply a mechanism to increase pay bands that will surely end badly.
Two's in is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 25th Jun 2023, 18:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,203
Received 117 Likes on 53 Posts
RAF have Direct Entrant SNCOs.......as annoying as they can be we managed to co-exist with them. Similar to the Army promoting pilots to WO?
downsizer is online now  
Old 25th Jun 2023, 18:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Two's in
All NCO pilots have at least 4 years service before attending the Army Pilots course, some will be AAC ground-crew and have experience and direct knowledge of Aviation Operations, but many others will be from across a broad selection of the rest of the Army. It is this cross-section that contributes to the All-Arms battle knowledge that helps Aviation understand intimately the ground commanders intent when providing support. Having Artillery, Infantry and Combat Service Support soldier pilots is a great example of getting "utility" from "drivers, airframe". NCO pilots are not as distracted by the burden of command, career courses, Staff College and moving up the Monkey Tree before set age limits as Officers are, so they naturally get more flying experience and generally become almost like PAS was intended to be - a group of experienced and professional aviators. The "high cost" is a red herring. Service continuity and experience carry a price, that is what the Army pays for with experienced NCO pilots.

I would agree the Warrant Officer after pilot training would be a serious misstep. The Army may be more and more specialized with very technical trade groups, but currently if you carry rank in the Army, you are expected to have the experience and knowledge to discharge the duties of that rank. It would be hard to see how anyone with a limited purview of Army operations would be able to do that with little more than 5 years service - unless they created a "specialist" group of Aviation WO2 who stayed firmly in that lane. Not sure how interactions with the 15 year Warrant Officers would go in that scenario. The Army has proven a couple of good points over the years, (1) Flying is a young persons game, the sooner you grab them the more utility you get, (2) You don't need rank or a commission to be an effective battlefield pilot. The move to WO2 would seem to indicate either the lesson hasn't stuck, or it's simply a mechanism to increase pay bands that will surely end badly.
re: v quick progression to rank worn, it’s not particularly different to SSgt Ammo Techs after a similar timeframe.
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2023, 18:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet
As they say in a well known UK business…



With the savings they could employ more engineers to get the Apaches and Wildcats more serviceable?
doubt it.
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 15:16
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not scotland
Posts: 359
Received 60 Likes on 28 Posts
This will not help retention

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66020261

Always knew that we were going to get shafted in comparison to others however, expect 3.5%. The “offer” is no longer valid and I fully expect that there will be a huge increase in people leaving the Service in the next 12 months, including me.
I fear for the RAF because it’s not the pilots or lack of that will hurt us, but the TG1 exodus.
Toadstool is online now  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 15:54
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Between a rock and a hard place.
Age: 52
Posts: 125
Received 15 Likes on 5 Posts
Civil servants got 4.5 to 5% plus £1500 so I'd like to think we'd get at least that if not a smidge more (5% across the board?).
4everAD is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 16:09
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Toadstool
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66020261

Always knew that we were going to get shafted in comparison to others however, expect 3.5%. The “offer” is no longer valid and I fully expect that there will be a huge increase in people leaving the Service in the next 12 months, including me.
I fear for the RAF because it’s not the pilots or lack of that will hurt us, but the TG1 exodus.
because I can never keep track: TG1 are…?
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 16:18
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not scotland
Posts: 359
Received 60 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by alfred_the_great
because I can never keep track: TG1 are…?
Engineers.
Toadstool is online now  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 16:38
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Toadstool
Engineers.
ah.

there are ships alongside for lack of engineers.

it’s almost as if the UK decided engineers weren’t worth investing in.
alfred_the_great is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by alfred_the_great:
Old 26th Jun 2023, 18:10
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 553 Likes on 151 Posts
Toadstool

Originally Posted by Toadstool
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66020261

Always knew that we were going to get shafted in comparison to others however, expect 3.5%. The “offer” is no longer valid and I fully expect that there will be a huge increase in people leaving the Service in the next 12 months, including me.
I fear for the RAF because it’s not the pilots or lack of that will hurt us, but the TG1 exodus.
“It’s not about the money” though, remember.

BV
Bob Viking is online now  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 18:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,203
Received 117 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
“It’s not about the money” though, remember.

BV
It partly fvcking is though! I have less stress for more money now!
downsizer is online now  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 19:12
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not scotland
Posts: 359
Received 60 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
“It’s not about the money” though, remember.

BV
😉Agreed, but when an organisation that constantly stands in for other organisations when those organisations strike for more pay but the stand in constantly gets shafted because they are free labour then it’s about worth. And that’s for starters.
Toadstool is online now  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 19:22
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 553 Likes on 151 Posts
Toadstool

Agreed. One of many reasons sadly.

I personally couldn’t believe it when it happened, but people always told me that when it was time to leave, you’d know. For me it was very stark. I loved my 23 years but when another job offer came and it coincided with some admin chafe that got on my nerves it was like a lightning bolt. My mind was made up. Thankfully manning were excellent and I was out in record time.

From the outside looking in it certainly feels like, if I hadn’t already left, I’d be heading for the door anyway. There has been no good news in the ten months since I left and I think I’d hate still being in right now. Everything I have seen since I left has only served to validate my decision.

BV
Bob Viking is online now  
Old 26th Jun 2023, 20:15
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not scotland
Posts: 359
Received 60 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
Agreed. One of many reasons sadly.

I personally couldn’t believe it when it happened, but people always told me that when it was time to leave, you’d know. For me it was very stark. I loved my 23 years but when another job offer came and it coincided with some admin chafe that got on my nerves it was like a lightning bolt. My mind was made up. Thankfully manning were excellent and I was out in record time.

From the outside looking in it certainly feels like, if I hadn’t already left, I’d be heading for the door anyway. There has been no good news in the ten months since I left and I think I’d hate still being in right now. Everything I have seen since I left has only served to validate my decision.

BV
Its a shame BV.

I’ve had a fantastic time in the RAF and thoroughly enjoyed my flying (being flown) career. A good friend of mine left 3 years ago and he was the same, when you know it’s time to leave, it’s time. I’ve still got 6 years left however I want to leave with a smile on my face rather than being bitter and twisted.
I’d recommend the RAF to anyone however increasing FGens, duty commitments, daily changing priorities and a 30% increase in workload due to workforce constraints takes its toll over a long career.
The PM praising the military on another (working) Armed Forces Day then telling us to take the hit with another less than average pay increase during a cost of living crisis is my straw that broke..
Toadstool is online now  
Old 28th Jun 2023, 16:58
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 354
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I have read the report in detail now and, if implemented, the recommendations will make a difference. As previous posters have noted though, without adequate pay (and I mean adequate, not any great riches) it’s difficult to see how MoD are going to stem the outflow and retain experience. I predict that when this year’s pay award is made, probably in September, Wallace will stand up and quote the most recent inflation figure as proof that the award isn’t far below inflation (because it will be below), failing to note that the award was due in April when inflation was around 9%. A colleague of mine noted that since 2008 his pay had increased by 18% while inflation had risen by 43%.
I think that there will always be a belief in the military that rank and pay are highly correlated (apart from doctors…GP average pay £72000 compared with well over £100000 in the military where working conditions are also much better for them…go figure). A FJ pilot five years out of the OCU will probably be on £52500….how is possible to justify this? Oh, that includes a 14.5% X factor uplift for being in the military.
kintyred is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.