Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

USN F-5N Accident - 31 May 23

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

USN F-5N Accident - 31 May 23

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st May 2023, 17:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,607
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
F-5N "Aggressor" of VFC-111 (Reserve composite training sqn) lost off the coast of Key West, FL.

Pilot ejected safely using a newly upgraded Martin-Baker Mk US16J seat, and recovered by MH-60S from NAS Key West, FL.
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2023, 05:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Navy F-5 Jet Crashes Near Key West - Seapower (seapowermagazine.org)
Nice looking machine indeed [Sundowners an alternative sobriquet for VF805] : "ARLINGTON, Va. — A U.S. Navy F-5N Tiger II jet crashed near Key West. Florida, on May 31, the Navy said. Naval Air Station (NAS) Key West said in a Facebook post that the aircraft’s pilot “ejected from an F-5N aircraft approximately 25 miles from Boca Chica Field at approximately 9:20 a.m. today. A NAS Key West Search and Rescue crew launched an MH-60S helicopter and rescued the pilot, who is being transported to a Miami-area hospital for further evaluation.” The pilot and F-5N were assigned to Fighter Squadron Composite (VFC) 111, which is a reserve adversary squadron based at NAS Key West...."
https://seapowermagazine.org/wp-cont...-KM072-010.jpg

SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2023, 00:23
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,607
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
My favorite F-5N "Aggressor" scheme is this from VMFT-401 at MCAS Yuma, AZ



RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2023, 06:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 54
Posts: 108
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
In my naivety I these had all retired being replaced by F-16s' and F-15s'. Glad the pilot survived and can give feedback.
NIREP reader is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2023, 07:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Plenty of info on the web about the upgraded F-5N - an example "Martin-Baker successfully installed the 1st US16J ejection seat" : Navy’s F-5 modernization program completes engineering phase and moves into production and deployment | NAVAIR & Martin-Baker Installs 1st US Navy F-5 Seat Upgrade – Martin Baker
SpazSinbad is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 2nd Jun 2023, 17:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,201
Received 401 Likes on 248 Posts
Thanks for the pictures, that's a beautiful aircraft.
Sorry to see one stricken from the list, and glad to see that the Silk One Departure worked.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2023, 21:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,062
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by SpazSinbad
Plenty of info on the web about the upgraded F-5N - an example "Martin-Baker successfully installed the 1st US16J ejection seat" : Navy’s F-5 modernization program completes engineering phase and moves into production and deployment | NAVAIR & Martin-Baker Installs 1st US Navy F-5 Seat Upgrade – Martin Baker

Seems quite a few front line operators of F-5's and other older types could use a seat upgrade (if these can or choose to afford it)
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2023, 00:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by sandiego89
Seems quite a few front line operators of F-5's and other older types could use a seat upgrade (if these can or choose to afford it)
I see quite a few F-5/T-38 are now MB, makes sense to replace the bang seat as seat survival technology has moved on since Northrop made theirs.
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2023, 01:13
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,413
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Side question - what (if any) differences are there between an F-5 and a T-38?
tdracer is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2023, 04:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,944
Received 393 Likes on 208 Posts
Number of seats is about all td, fuselage stretch naturally to accomodate.
megan is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2023, 10:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
td may have meant the difference between an F-5B/F and a T-38 rather than the single-seater.
Jobza Guddun is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2023, 11:55
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,281
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by Jobza Guddun
td may have meant the difference between an F-5B/F and a T-38 rather than the single-seater.
F-5's most visual difference is the LERX. Also F5s are equiped with AN/APQ-159 Radar, RWR, Chaff dispenser and can carry and fire real armament (ignoring the small number of AT-38s and those used at Edwards for weapon system trials) .

They've lasted well considering I first saw some of these same airframes at Alconbury with the 527th TFTAS 40 + years ago, still love the 'Aggressor' schemes.

Last edited by SLXOwft; 4th Jun 2023 at 15:13. Reason: gg
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2023, 12:03
  #13 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,956
Received 861 Likes on 257 Posts
apart from weapons systems, the F-5 all models, has LE flaps, he T-38 has only TE flaps.
fdr is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2023, 19:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
HOLD that TIGER - Hold that Tiger (repeat chorus): https://sldinfo.com/wp-content/uploa...-F5N-Tiger.jpg (0.5Mb)


SpazSinbad is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 4th Jun 2023, 20:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
The Northrop seat was pretty basic and very low tech. MB initially fitted their advanced and very capable seat to the NASA T38s as a ‘loss leader’. USAF are generally pretty anti MB (conversely, after Viet Nam, USN think MB seats are wonderful) but they lost quite a few T38/F5/crews in low level accidents/incidents and finally ‘saw the light’. USAF eventually fitted the MB seats and the retrofit programme started around 2012. World wide operators also began to see the benefits shortly after. I gather the Aggressor F5 jets came into the fold around 2019.
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2023, 03:05
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,944
Received 393 Likes on 208 Posts
And the ultimate that was never to be.


megan is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Jun 2023, 11:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,497
Received 89 Likes on 35 Posts
Side question - what (if any) differences are there between an F-5 and a T-38?
ISTR that the wing construction on the T38 was different in that it used a honeycomb internal structure, but I cannot find any confirmation that the F5 doesn't have this.

Re the F20, I was in SOAF when Erik the Boss came back from the demo of the F20, with its unusual (for the time) laser gyro systems being seen as the USP. He wasn't impressed, knowing that the far more capable F16 would be available before too long.
Thud_and_Blunder is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2023, 10:07
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I thought that the F5/20 was a single seat version of the T38. The T38 being designed to fit the requirement for a supersonic advanced trainer, whilst producing a successful and capable aircraft I heard from test pilots that the requirement to be supersonic limited the qualities in other flight regimes.
Miles Magister is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2023, 14:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,062
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Miles Magister
I thought that the F5/20 was a single seat version of the T38. The T38 being designed to fit the requirement for a supersonic advanced trainer, whilst producing a successful and capable aircraft I heard from test pilots that the requirement to be supersonic limited the qualities in other flight regimes.
I would not consider the F-5 a single seat version of the T-38. Both were derived from the N-156 design and obviously have a lot in common but there are subtle differences in appearance, beneath the skin, and roles. There are also 2 seat F-5's. F-5 has larger intakes, different wing structure and leading edge extensions, different avionics, different landing gear/tires, weapon pylons and the wingtip sidewinder rails. The E and F models were substantially improved and a further changed from the baseline, including radar, improved avionics....

​​​​​
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2023, 17:08
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,281
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
The F-5G/F-20 was the child of late 70s FMS/Export of Sensitive Technology politics and then came Reagan and a less restrictive viewpoint.
SLXOwft is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.