Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

NORDO over England 04/03/2023, N362PH

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

NORDO over England 04/03/2023, N362PH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2023, 22:37
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,287
Received 715 Likes on 252 Posts
Originally Posted by toratoratora
Quote: “ but it was a weekend and would they have any serviceable ones?”

Really?
Do you know what QRA is?
Battleflight in the good old days. Two fully armed Lightnings in the sky before you could draw the next isobar.
langleybaston is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by langleybaston:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 06:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Uk
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by fireflybob
I believe it's something like "If you do not comply I am instructed by His Majesty's Government to shoot you down".
Wouldn’t have been that hard to say, and the pilot would have known it. There is no way in a million years the government gives the go ahead to shoot down a passenger aircraft.

Remember a politician somewhere has to make that decision with nowhere to duck and cover the flak.
Flyhighfirst is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 06:15
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 775
Received 571 Likes on 209 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyhighfirst
Wouldn’t have been that hard to say, and the pilot would have known it. There is no way in a million years the government gives the go ahead to shoot down a passenger aircraft.

Remember a politician somewhere has to make that decision with nowhere to duck and cover the flak.
Circumstances are everything, but I think you’re quite wrong.
Video Mixdown is offline  
The following 5 users liked this post by Video Mixdown:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 09:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 1,141
Received 55 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyhighfirst
Wouldn’t have been that hard to say, and the pilot would have known it. There is no way in a million years the government gives the go ahead to shoot down a passenger aircraft.

Remember a politician somewhere has to make that decision with nowhere to duck and cover the flak.
I hope it never comes to it, but 9/11 greatly swung the pointer to the "comply or we shoot" option.

No politician with the required authority will duck their responsibility. Presented with a very real threat of an aircraft heading off course towards a major city, not complying with an armed aircraft's instruction to follow, and not responding in a manner that every pilot knows and understands. The consequences of inaction are known in those circumstances and the flak far greater than actually doing what everyone in the chain is trained to do.

Incidents like this in the press make it known to the public what the consequences could be. If it happened for real I don't believe any backlash would be as great as you think.

An added bonus, if you can call it a bonus, is that post 9/11, every passenger knows the consequences and will fight given the opportunity. Long gone are the days of ""sit quietly and no one will be harmed".

SATCOS WHIPPING BOY is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 10:12
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,460
Received 363 Likes on 212 Posts
"the days of ""sit quietly and no one will be harmed"."

I though t that was the standard BA Passenger Briefing...................
Asturias56 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Asturias56:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 10:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 1,141
Received 55 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
"the days of ""sit quietly and no one will be harmed"."

I though t that was the standard BA Passenger Briefing...................
Interesting. Maybe I should have said "...sit quietly and no one will be harmed.being followed"

What would you do in a hijack / unlawful interference situation knowing the likely outcomes? The passengers of Flight 93 knew their fate if they did nothing - they fought back. They were unfortunate that they failed in saving themselves but there are people alive today blissfully unaware that their lives were saved by the passengers' actions that day; the flight never made it to its intended target.
SATCOS WHIPPING BOY is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 13:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY
Presented with a very real threat of an aircraft heading off course towards a major city
Reports indicate that this particular aircraft was actually 'directed' overhead Reading, Heathrow and London, which caused considerable disruption within the London TMA.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 15:27
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
Originally Posted by Talkdownman
Reports indicate that this particular aircraft was actually 'directed' overhead Reading, Heathrow and London, which caused considerable disruption within the London TMA.
US registered where as far as I know they only use 25 kHz radios; probably never used the 8.33 kHz setting on his radio and didn't know how to select it.
But why not revert to his previous radio selection if he couldn't make contact with London Control?
chevvron is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 15:30
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 1,141
Received 55 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Talkdownman
Reports indicate that this particular aircraft was actually 'directed' overhead Reading, Heathrow and London, which caused considerable disruption within the London TMA.
Not just reports, the FR24 playback shows exactly that, and show it descending.

I wonder if there was an initial plan to put it into LHR, but that changed last minute. ???

Fr24 shows quite a few aircraft sat on the ground waiting to go.
SATCOS WHIPPING BOY is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 15:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
Originally Posted by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY
Not just reports, the FR24 playback shows exactly that, and show it descending.

I wonder if there was an initial plan to put it into LHR, but that changed last minute. ???

Fr24 shows quite a few aircraft sat on the ground waiting to go.
Don't rely on what you see on FR24; there's always a queue for departures at Heathrow. Talkdownman will tell you how long; I've never worked there.
chevvron is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 15:47
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 551
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY
I wonder if there was an initial plan to put it into LHR, but that changed last minute. ???
London Stansted: The UK's Designated Destination For Hijacks (or similar events)
DIBO is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 15:52
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 551
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
But why not revert to his previous radio selection if he couldn't make contact with London Control?
Why not use 121.5 when you've trouble contacting anybody...pretty basic...
DIBO is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 16:14
  #33 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,574
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Originally Posted by DIBO
Why not use 121.5 when you've trouble contacting anybody...pretty basic...
According to some, 121.5 should never actually be used to TALK to anyone. It interrupts their snooze patterns.
ShyTorque is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by ShyTorque:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 17:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
According to some, 121.5 should never actually be used to TALK to anyone. It interrupts their snooze patterns.
I was told you couldn't get a word in edgeways; it annoys US pilots who want to discuss their golf scores.
I even heard that once they replied to a 'MAYDAY' by saying 'hey fella you're transmitting on guard'.
chevvron is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by chevvron:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 17:32
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 75
Posts: 2,697
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY
Not just reports, the FR24 playback shows exactly that, and show it descending.

I wonder if there was an initial plan to put it into LHR, but that changed last minute. ???

Fr24 shows quite a few aircraft sat on the ground waiting to go.
In the old days I thought the procedure in the event of radio failure was to continue to destination, SEN in this case, in accordance with your Flight Plan. He descends from FL180 to FL070 between Reading and Egham, heading East, then at 1224Z turns onto a Northerly heading maintaining FL070. As his Flight Plan wouldn't have conformed with that doesn't it look like he was instructed to do so? Anyone know at what time was the interception made? Was he under the 'control' of the Typhoon from Egham onwards or did that comence later than that?
Expressflight is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 20:56
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sleepy Hollow
Posts: 319
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb Good point

Good point Chevron; from basic flight school & airmanship (common sense) if no joy on new freq’y go back to previous freq’y that was working, I had to do that myself once at night inbound to McCarran & saved the night for us


old-timer is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Mar 2023, 20:58
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sleepy Hollow
Posts: 319
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Good point Chevron
old-timer is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 21:10
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,670
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
And if you`ve really lost the radios,pull out your PLB/ELT........
sycamore is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 21:29
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: hector's house
Posts: 173
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I doubt anyone seriously thought that a civil aircraft with only 2 crew on board had been hijacked, however it was a good reason to provide valuable training to the fighter controllers and the QRA and give the technical equipment a good workout.
hec7or is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2023, 21:41
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 366
Received 161 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by hec7or
I doubt anyone seriously thought that a civil aircraft with only 2 crew on board had been hijacked, however it was a good reason to provide valuable training to the fighter controllers and the QRA and give the technical equipment a good workout.
Doesn't need to be hijacked by a third party; both crew in league (or one overpowers the other) to initiate some nefarious agenda.
DuncanDoenitz is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by DuncanDoenitz:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.