Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

NI Troubles amnesty plan changes.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

NI Troubles amnesty plan changes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th May 2022, 09:20
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 523
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Ah, there's the professional journalist at work.....................
Play the ball, not the man.
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 09:56
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,072
Received 2,940 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Originally Posted by melmothtw
Absolutely I do, but it was the British government that instituted the amnesty of Republican and Loyalist paramilitaries for the sake of peace. As I've said, British soldiers aren't terrorists, and so should be held to a higher standard.

Thousands of British soldiers/airmen served in Northern Ireland without commiting any crimes. For the few that may have, these need to be investigated.

That's all.

Please continue to comment,

Can I just say one thing, It is nearly 50 years ago since the troubles and while I can understand your ideal that British Servicemen needed to be held to account (BTW you missed Royal Navy off your list of those that served in the province,)

The problem I think you might find will be finding credible witnesses, those involved in say rioting and a civilian getting shot at are probably going to be the very same people that were rioting and against the military presence, hence hostile witnesses while often those for the defence or prosecution have since died. I would also point out any death will have been investigated at the time.

Where does this seem like justice is being served?

A number of the soldiers have repeatedly been investigated and cleared of wrongdoing only to be reinvestigated by new units set up in Northern Ireland to deal with historical cases.
That's more of a witch hunt than justice.

You just have to read this to see the problems faced

https://www.judiciaryni.uk/sites/jud...oldier%20C.pdf

I served in NI BTW to be fair.


..

Last edited by NutLoose; 12th May 2022 at 14:42.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 10:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Haraka
N.B. There is a difference between an opinion and a qualified opinion
Indeed. A point that our journalist friend would do well to remember.

His little sulky retort regarding "echo chamber" I think best sums up the value he places in qualified opinions.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 10:14
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 523
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Late to the party, but if you don't want to hear any opinions other than those you agree with, it kind of is an echo chamber.

Peace out!
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 10:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
Late to the party, but if you don't want to hear any opinions other than those you agree with, it kind of is an echo chamber.

Peace out!
An acknowledgement by those with other opinions of the unfairness regarding investigating one side, whilst the other go scot-free, would be a start.

The terms of the GFA created the climate for a witch hunt against elderly ex-service personnel. This was and is unacceptable.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 10:56
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may well have Refuelled CRAB@SAAvn, at some point. When I did my first det to NI, my parents had no clue what actually happened there.

Last edited by RotorsTurningRefuel; 12th May 2022 at 11:45. Reason: Was meat to be a reply to CRAB@SAAv
RotorsTurningRefuel is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 11:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by RotorsTurningRefuel
I may well have Refuelled you, at some point. When I did my first det to NI, my parents had no clue what actually happened there.
Another ex-Wing Mong.

​​​​​​😉

No time for tea breaks....

And yes, it's quite shocking how little of what went on in NI was reported on The Mainland.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 14:27
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,333
Received 629 Likes on 272 Posts
Mil 26 - I am more than happy to debate the pros and cons of justice but a military aviation website isn't normally the place for it.

Moreover, the 'echo chamber' comment was him playing the man, hence my retort.

A journalist should be listening to both sides and making a reasoned, balanced argument rather than just a bold statement on a forum which is bound to inflame - but perhaps that is modern journalism for you.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 15:12
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 523
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Mil 26 - I am more than happy to debate the pros and cons of justice but a military aviation website isn't normally the place for it.
Perhaps one to take up with the OP, as melmothtw didn't start this thread.

Moreover, the 'echo chamber' comment was him playing the man, hence my retort.
As far as I read it, the echo chamber comment didn't appear to be directed at any one poster in particular, and was more of an observation on the general unwillingness to engage with any opinions that didn't tally with their own. Could be wrong, but that's how I read it.

A journalist should be listening to both sides and making a reasoned, balanced argument rather than just a bold statement on a forum which is bound to inflame - but perhaps that is modern journalism for you.
His comments seemed as balanced as yours, or anyone else's on the thread.

Peace out!

Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 16:39
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,333
Received 629 Likes on 272 Posts
As far as I read it, the echo chamber comment didn't appear to be directed at any one poster in particular, and was more of an observation on the general unwillingness to engage with any opinions that didn't tally with their own. Could be wrong, but that's how I read it.
it was quite clearly aimed at me as his post included a quote from me.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 19:31
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,813
Received 141 Likes on 65 Posts
What to say is difficult, because the NI goalposts have moved so far for political expediency. I never served in that benighted Province, thank Deity. But, adequately impacted personally to have a totally unbalanced view about the murdering ba*r**ds vs. The Home Team facing their own deaths every single day from various methods.
In England
My mother caught up in a railway station event.
Me, my daughter and my father on-site for the Heathrow T1 bomb (and my car survived)
Me handily placed for the No 10 mortar attack.
… and add personal friends murdered or damaged.

Hundreds of cold-blooded murders still walk the streets. Is it any wonder that those on the Blue Team who were there and suffered stretched the boundaries?

MPN11 is offline  
Old 13th May 2022, 07:48
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,478
Received 365 Likes on 214 Posts
"because the NI goalposts have moved so far for political expediency"

i'd say it was for political reality - the only way to stop the war was for both sides to compromise - which they did. Otherwise we'd still be fighting there

Compromises are messy, and unpopular with many as they will always believe that "one more big push and we would have won" is unprovable years after the event.
Asturias56 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.