Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

XH558 hangar plans scrapped

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

XH558 hangar plans scrapped

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jul 2022, 14:15
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,815
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by WB627
There must be a 5* hotel in Doncaster
There's luxury accomodation a few miles north of Finningley; 2 sites, very secure, with a control tower.
chevvron is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2022, 18:50
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
I suppose if the airfield is sold for housing and I presume gravel extraction from under the runways and aprons, the best they could hope for is being housed in one of the what will become empty hangars as the live aviation parts moves out.
It won't be sold, as Peel Group are a property development group.......
Given the links to the motorway network etc., I would think yet another large Amazon distribution centre, plus maybe cloud data centre type facilities, with maybe solar farm etc.
Some of it could get hived off for some housing maybe?
Given the amount of money VTTS owe Peel Group for unpaid rent, they'll be lucky to even get anything for the tin triangle. I'd be surprised if there would be enough space given over to be able to continue running the engines etc., let move it under power.

Peel will want to maximise money generation from the site, so I wouldn't be very optimistic about '558's future going forward.
I think it will be a good few months before any indications of what will happen to the site becomes apparent.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2022, 19:39
  #43 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
On the subject of what to do with aircraft and apologies for taking this thread of tangent for a couple of posts.
Anyone know what will happen to the aircraft at Dunsfold? In fact what's not happening at Dunsfold?
uxb99 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2022, 07:21
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Up North
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Announced yesterday that Peel Group are now looking to close the airport and turn it into a warehousing complex.

ej200man is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 20:01
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 571
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
Looking for a new home

https://vulcantothesky.org/news/vulc...rport-in-2023/
Brewster Buffalo is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2022, 14:39
  #46 (permalink)  
wub
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,215
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Brewster Buffalo
and more money. Let go for goodness sake.
wub is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2022, 14:45
  #47 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
Yes, they would be better off trying to buy a patch of land just off the airport and stick it on that to rot. Or come to a deal to put it as a gate guardian for the new warehouse project.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2022, 06:10
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: RAF Kinloss
Posts: 161
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Yes, they would be better off trying to buy a patch of land just off the airport and stick it on that to rot. Or come to a deal to put it as a gate guardian for the new warehouse project.
You mean, their plan to fly it out of there after 7 years of corroding in the corner isn't viable? Colour me surprised. I'd loved to have been a fly on the wall of the CAA office when they approached them with that idea...
RAF_Techie101 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2022, 07:11
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by wub
and more money. Let go for goodness sake.
Indeed.

Strip it of all parts and along with all their spares stash, divi it all up among the other Vulcan groups, and cut the bloody thing up, and that will be the end of VTTS.
They haven't got a hope in hell of doing what Crash n Smash did with the Hendon Vulcan to move it elsewhere, and whats the point anyway, it will just be another non-active dead Vulcan, and there are enough of them dotted around already, some of which could do with some help with parts.

Of course we all knew this was the likely outcome within 10 years of the last landing as soon as they chose to land back at DSA, so its not exactly a surprise to most.

As said, would have loved to have been the fly on the wall of the CAA office when that call came in
GeeRam is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2022, 07:45
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,826
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
They did do engine runs just the other day (via an FB friend) so the Aircraft is sort of 'Live'.
Not sure if just low power anti det runs or if they took the power above idle.
longer ron is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2022, 08:29
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by longer ron
They did do engine runs just the other day (via an FB friend) so the Aircraft is sort of 'Live'.
Not sure if just low power anti det runs or if they took the power above idle.
They took her for a taxy trundle down the runway and back last month, there was a video posted online somewhere. Probably the last time she'll move under her own power most likely now.
GeeRam is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.