Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Armed Forces Covenant

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Armed Forces Covenant

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2021, 19:57
  #1 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,018
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Armed Forces Covenant

The Armed Forces Bill is being introduced to the House of Commons today. A step forward, or paces backward?
https://www.forces.net/news/new-legislation-enshrine-armed-forces-covenant-law

airsound

airsound is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2021, 08:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,503
Received 368 Likes on 216 Posts
Virtue signalling on many of the issues I'm afraid - but probably some useful stuff in the tiding-up clauses on things like the Justice System
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2021, 09:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,226
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
The important issue at present is to get it enshrined in law. Then one can look to enact and enforce the law, which is an even bigger battle. Both main parties (in England and Wales) have proposed this in the past, and both opposed it when in Opposition. This is indicative of the hurdles the gallant Mr Mercer MP has faced, and such is the current level of opposition he's a little pessimistic about getting it through the Lords. Who's pressing their buttons, given few understand the issues?

The very mention of John Spellar should be sufficient for Servicemen to support the Bill, regardless of how diluted it has become. He still owes an apology to families and to Parliament for his outright lies during the early Mull of Kintyre debates. It is an abomination that he still sits on the Defence Committee.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2021, 10:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,500
Received 89 Likes on 35 Posts
The very mention of John Spellar should be sufficient for Servicemen to support the Bill, regardless of how diluted it has become. He still owes an apology to families and to Parliament for his outright lies during the early Mull of Kintyre debates. It is an abomination that he still sits on the Defence Committee.
...I wish this forum had a "like" button or equivalent; couldn't agree more.
Thud_and_Blunder is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2021, 11:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,166
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Even if it did come in to law in the most robust of manners it still would not change anything. There are numerous existing civilian & military laws, including ones that carry the punishment of imprisonment, that have been found to have been breached by members of the star chamber that lead to no action whatsoever. Civilian police give primacy to their military or MoD equivalents and the 4 police forces under MoD control simply do not start an investigations into any VSO or senior civil service personnel - even if they have evidential material. The Service Justice System is just for the little people and the little people have no influence on the lofty aims of this Bill.
Just This Once... is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.