Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Sunday Express drivel

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Sunday Express drivel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2002, 11:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sunday Express drivel

Anyone else read the tripe by the Sunday Express Investigations Editor on his foray to the hairdresser at Boscombe Down and subsequent tour of the base?

Granted, I thought that his point about sneaking a bomb in was valid, but he went too far when he remarked that he could half inch a Harrier if he had the 'grounding of a pilot'. Very funny.

What an arse.
Steve Davies is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2002, 13:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18m N of LGW
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the haircut 'pass' is true - I bet it isn't now!
InFinRetirement is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 11:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I quite agree, and think that QinetiQ's guards should have the right to shoot the idiot if he ever goes back there. I didn't really follow his supposition that the "RAF's top secret missile test base" is open to a 911-style attack because he could drive about unchallenged for 20 minutes.

Am I right in thinking that his 'Boscombe has Europe's longest runway' statement was bo!!ocks, and is there really a seized MiG-21, or is he talking about the Lightning?

Rubbish newspaper, rubbish hack - idiots like him give journalists a bad name.
sprucemoose is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 12:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: N51:37:39 W1:19:16 Feel free to use as a waypoint.
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spruce

The MIG-21 is actually in the museum set up in one of the HAS's a few years ago. It was presented to the Ben Fund by the Slovak Air Force at an IAT a few years back, eventually bought by a private individual and loaned to the museum.
Man-on-the-fence is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 16:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Peered into a discarded Express today - what a crock that paper is. Armed Apaches!! Guffaw, guffaw... Hope he didn't try and snatch a shot of the Harvard or Basset which only come out once the satellite has passed!

Have had several fine trims at the hands of Richard when I was a regular visitor - he does a fine job. I think the barber actually resides in the RAF part of the site and is FA to do with QinetiQ (although I suspect they have to pay the MoD plods).

And as I recall the last time I looked the "Mig" adjacent to his shop was in fact a Lightning T.5.

It does make you wonder what other $hite the press palm off as the truth.
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 18:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: door or ramp, don't mind.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

It's enough to make you want to "almost" spin them a yarn just to see if they'll bite. Get it in to print, then see how THEY like it when their distant little world of crappy, second rate, high school tabloid tit-funded comic book journo-sensationalism is invaded for no other reason than to prove a much-contrived point.

Piers Morgan.....(you beady eyed, crinkly haired ****), we know where you live.

Last edited by Talking Radalt; 19th Aug 2002 at 18:27.
Talking Radalt is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 18:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A lotof the rubbish that that paper posts have been based on posts here as the reporters often quote PPRune in their articles. Shame they can't write the truth, but what do you expect from a journalist?
Jimlad is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 19:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look out! Jacko's about!
fobotcso is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 21:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Over there, behind that tree.
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking R said. . .
It's enough to make you want to "almost" spin them a yarn just to see if they'll bite.

But then they would merely turn it around to make it read as if they were making your story public as an example of the dissaffection / mendacity / lack of moral fibre / etc in the services today. Would end up as a witch-hunt because the media is tranistory by definition - and is NEVER wrong! Anyway, they [and the vast majority of the UK public] will have forgotten the gist of the thrust of your tale-spin by the time tomorrow's edition comes out with their spin on your tale.

And with most of the tabloids, if your tale hasn't got big boobs in it nobody will notice.




their
Beeayeate is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 22:31
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jimlad,

We aren't all like him, you know!
Steve Davies is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 22:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,187
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Yeah, don't tar all journos with the same brush, please.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2002, 00:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cannot comment on the article itself, as I haven't read it, but judging from the comments here, I presume it is not up to the usual "high" standard of tabloid reporting.

I can however comment on QinetiQ's security, since I have operated out of BD and Farnborough. It would not be appropiate for me to comment on a public forum about QinetiQ's specific procedures, but I would say that if they spent less time harrassing the staff on base with radar guns and speed traps, or taking ages to renew clearances, and a bit more time dealing with the casual visitors, they might not have let this particular reporter through.
Matt Black is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2002, 17:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
boscombe

saw the article and almost wet myself with laughter. there was a pompous letter yesterday from someone who i think was ex national service saying that he thought guarding raf stations was what the raf regiment was for. and since when was boscombe down an raf station? as a final point when you deal with mod plods dont you miss the raf police?
canberra is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.